Isolation of transcription elongation complexes from the 5′ and 3′ regions of a single gene Isolation of transcription elongation complexes from the 5′

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Advertisements

Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Cdc42.GTP directly activates PAK4.
Vav‐1 gene‐targeting strategy.
Nup-PI: The Nucleopore-Promoter Interaction of Genes in Yeast
Dan Ding, Kaiyuan Chen, Yuedan Chen, Hong Li, Kabin Xie 
Analysis of mutational effects of parameters on the phenotype (i. e
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Distribution of summed MS1 intensities
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Shinya Takahata, Yaxin Yu, David J. Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
Histone deacetylase 1 protein depletion affects general histone acetylation and specific gene expression. Histone deacetylase 1 protein depletion affects.
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e4 (October 2018)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Validation of knock‐in cell line and image calibration (related to Fig 1)‏ Validation of knock‐in cell line and image calibration (related to Fig 1) Validation.
Knock‐in of PP7 stem‐loop sequences provides visualization of estrogen‐mediated transcription from the endogenous GREB1 locus in living cells (see also.
Comparison of proteomics and RNA‐Seq data.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
An integrated NHR network.
Population kinetics and simulation of E2 induction. Related to Fig 4
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Pcf11 Is a Termination Factor in Drosophila that Dismantles the Elongation Complex by Bridging the CTD of RNA Polymerase II to the Nascent Transcript 
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. (A–D)
Purification and identification of RECQ4 complex from human cells.
SP3 provides an efficient means for preparing protein and peptide samples for MS analysis Schematic of the SP3 workflow in a single tube. SP3 provides.
Ubqln1 interacts with Ubqln4.
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Jin Mo Park, Janis Werner, Jung Mo Kim, John T Lis, Young-Joon Kim 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Fig. 5 E2F1 also interacts with alternatively spliced transcripts from the MECOM gene. E2F1 also interacts with alternatively spliced transcripts from.
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Isolation of transcription elongation complexes from the 5′ and 3′ regions of a single gene Isolation of transcription elongation complexes from the 5′ and 3′ regions of a single gene Schematic demonstrating the sequential immunoprecipitation (IP) approach used to isolate 5′ and 3′ elongation complexes (ECs). GALp, GAL1 promoter; 2× PP7, two repeats of the PP7 stem‐loop encoding sequence; 2× MS2, two repeats of the MS2 stem‐loop encoding sequence; PCP‐GFP, PP7 coat protein fused to GFP; MCP‐RFP, MS2 coat protein fused to RFP.Western blots for input and unbound samples for Rpb3 (Pol II), GFP (5′ complexes), and RFP (3′ complexes) immunoprecipitations. The input samples for the GFP and RFP IPs correspond to the bound fraction of the Rpb3 IP.Silver stain of ECs isolated by single GFP IP (GFP), Pol II‐GFP sequential IP (Rpb3‐GFP), and single Pol II (Rpb3) IPs. M, molecular weight marker; kD, kilodalton.Top: depiction of RT–qPCR primer location for 5′ region and 3′ region primers in the stem‐loop‐TDH3 construct. Bottom: RT–qPCR demonstrating the fold enrichment of 5′ ECs over 3′ ECs after various RNase A fragmentation times. The input sample represents whole‐cell lysate while the 0 min sample is taken after the Rpb3 IP with no RNase A fragmentation.Silver stain of 5′ (Rpb3‐GFP) and 3′ (Rpb3‐RFP) ECs. M, molecular weight marker; kD, kilodalton.Bar graphs displaying the average number of reads per gene from NET‐seq analysis on sequentially isolated 5′ and 3′ ECs. Construct indicates reads from the stem‐loop‐TDH3 construct; Pol II genes indicates reads from all other Pol II genes. Error bars for Pol II genes represent standard deviation. 186 Pol II genes were detected in the 5′ (GFP) IPs, and 1,118 Pol II genes were detected in the 3′ (RFP) IPs.Top: depiction of the stem‐loop‐TDH3 construct. Bottom: cumulative fraction of NET‐seq reads plotted as a function distance from the transcription start site of the stem‐loop‐TDH3 construct for 5′ (green) and 3′ (red) ECs. Kevin M Harlen, and L Stirling Churchman Mol Syst Biol 2017;13:900 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend