Starting from the Basics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Check Beam Shear.
Advertisements

R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
1 James N. Bellinger 4-Feb-2009 ME+1 status and Endcap Z James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 4-Feb-2009.
Skeleton: Hardware Alignment for EMU meeting James N Bellinger 15-Mar-2009.
Journal #854/28/11 Describe the image of an object at the center of curvature of a concave mirror. You should be able to tell me three things about this.
Physics and Measurements.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.
Upgrade news and Proposed interventions during YETS for the Muon Barrel Alignment Szillási Zoltán, Béni Noémi (ATOMKI ) This project is supported by Hungarian.
Analog Alignment Sensors Status report – April 2004 Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
Partial Disassembly of the alignment devices on each ME11transfer plate, ME1/1 chamber and ME1/2 chamber. (6 on +Z and 6 on –Z side of the CMS)
Hand Crosscheck HSLM1. Position of REF DCOPS CENTER MAB Target DM distance DMdowel to DCOPS dowel DCOPS dowel to center.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.
Errors and Uncertainties In Measurements and in Calculations.
Level 3 Practical Investigation Where to start?. Aim This is the purpose of your practical i.e. what it is that you want to find out This is the purpose.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,
Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 13 February 2008 Cocoa Plans.
EMU Meeting, CERN, Sept 18-19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field up.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 25-February-2011 Z-sensor News James N. Bellinger 25-February-2011 Good news this time!
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 15-March-2009 Hardware Alignment.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010.
Turn to your new table of contents and correct the test date.
support structure ACDTopCoreThickness + 2 * ACDFaceThickness
How to Use the Earthquake Travel Time Graph (Page 11
EMU Alignment DAQ Endcap Alignment Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002
This pupil drew a Solidworks drawing and an isometric drawing by hand
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
Making Measurements On a piece of scrap paper, write down an appropriate reading for the length of the blue rectangle shown below: (then continue…) 1.
Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment
Transfer Line and CSC Rφ Reconstruction
I C A L I C A L DFME follow-up issue. Page. OPEN POINTS
Errors and Uncertainties
Plus Endcap Transfer Lines
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
DCOPS Readout before and during MTCC
DCOPS Monitoring of Iron Bending
University of Wisconsin-Madison
The Scientific Method By Torrie Epperson TLA Secondary Session 4
Model Editing (Continued)
Bearings.
Validating Transfer Line Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
To start the tutorial, push the f5 key in the upper row on your keyboard Then you can use the up and down arrow keys to advance backwards and forwards.
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Comparing Laser Fit to Barrel Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
Heat Transfer from Extended Surfaces (Fins)
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Surface Area.
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Réunion service Instrumentation Activités CMS-Traces
How to Use the Earthquake Travel Time Graph (Page 11
University of Wisconsin-Madison
How to Use the Earthquake Travel Time Graph (Page 11
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Transfer Line Calculations
University of Wisconsin at Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Validation Workshop at The Wales Annual Meeting
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

Starting from the Basics I think I understand the MAB target position now Skin thickness is variable per Zoltan: I use max, min is 100 microns less; ignore I think the ME+1/2 framework is understood, but: Rechecking Celso’s reference points against mine I think the DCOPS line is OK; rechecking Probable source of Z uncertainty is the transfer plate.

This is ME+1 Transfer Plate 1 I want to make sure I understand the reference dowel locations. Are the scales on these CAD drawings accurate? SCALE IS CORRECT Check your Dimensioning Plate is 120 mm x 400 mm CHECK.

Which are the reference pins for the distancemeter reaching the MAB? D are two Dowel Pins in the Plate I assume this is the DCOPS reference dowel YES THAT IS THE HSLM REF DOWEL Shim

A B C D E F G

Position values in CAD layout 15.00.00blk (ME+1/PT1) E: 351.5259, -440.1581 DCOPS dowel F: 351.5259, -433.4301 Center for Cocoa G: 120.5831, -447.4331 XFer DCOPS

Position values relative to center 15.00.00blk (ME+1/PT1) D: 67.5637, 8.2000 E: 0.0000 -6.7278 DCOPS dowel F: 0.0000, 0.0000 Center for Cocoa G: -230.9428, -14.0030 XFer DCOPS

Position values relative to center 15.00.00blk (ME+1/PT1) Name X Y Z A Something else 67.5637 8.2000 64.2101 or 17.3734 B Near DM ref 17.7437 C 60.2000 D Far DM ref 68.5226 E DCOPS Ref Dowel 0.0000 -6.7278 F Center G XFer DCOPS dowel -230.9428 -14.0030 31.9020 To bottom of plate. Or 16.625 to top of mount plate in drawing Notice that the DCOPS is shimmed away from the nominal center

CAD coords to Cocoa TP coords Cad X  CocoaTP X Cad Y  - CocoaTP Y Cad Z  - CocoaTP Z

TransferPlate Model ME+1 Name X (TP coords) Y (TP coords) Z (TP coords) Laser -21.1 48.78 -190 COPSref 6.724 COPSXfer -230.950 19.150 -9.350: typo? COPSXfer CAD -230.943 14.003 -31.902 DistanceMeter 67.529 -17.7 -17.388 DM-CAD 67.5637 -17.7437 -17.373 Or -16.625 PLATE (SLM coords) 7177.683 -48.78 21.1

Comments on previous table Transfer Line DCOPS In the CAD drawing, 9.53mm is the distance to the top of the Transfer Plate, not to the reference dowel for the Transfer Line DCOPS. Suspect the data copied from wrong line. The CAD drawing suggests 14 instead of 19: transcription error? DistanceMeter numbers are quite close I will take the -17.373 number (referencing the bottom of the blue plate) instead of -16.625 (referencing what looks like a mounting surface, but may not be)

ME+1Plate Objects in SLM coords Name X (SLM coords) Y (SLM coords) Z (SLM coords) Laser 7367.68 0.0 COPSref 7177.68 -42.056 21.1 COPSXfer 7187.03 -29.63 -209.85 COPSXfer CAD 7209.59 -34.78 -209.84 DistanceMeter 7195.07 -66.48 88.63 DM-CAD 7195.06 -66.52 88.66

ME+1Plate Objects in CMS coords Name X (SLM coords) Y (SLM coords) Z (SLM coords) Laser 7099.55 1970.65 6782 COPSref 6910.57 1941.85 6824.06 COPSXfer 6979.37 1721.19 6811.63 COPSXfer CAD 7001.15 1727.04 6816.78 DistanceMeter 6909.89 2011.58 6848.48 DM-CAD 6909.86 2011.61 6848.52 DM Z ideal is supposed to be 6847.70mm

ME+1 Plate Objects in Ideal CMS Coords Name X (SLM coords) Y (SLM coords) Z (SLM coords) Laser 7097.40 1971.51 6781.22 COPSref 6908.42 1942.72 6823.28 COPSXfer 6977.22 1722.06 6810.85 COPSXfer CAD 6999.00 1727.90 6816.00 DistanceMeter 6907.73 2012.45 6847.70 DM-CAD 6907.71 2012.48 6847.74 Using 7175.83, -48, 22.493 as Ideal TransferPlate position in SLM instead of PG values