Evaluation Summary Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Advertisements

Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November 2014.
Creating Freshmen Success Task Force Report High School Study Session Board Presentation January 30, 2007.
 Policy released on June 14, 2013  Currently on public comment period  Effective July 1, 2013, subject to change  Applies ONLY to classroom teaching.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
An Example of a Large Induction Project: The Minnesota Career and Technical Education Teacher Induction Program (CTE-TIP): A Pilot Project for the ‘06-’07.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Professional Development Update February 12, 2013 Prepared by: Lisa Schwartz.
AUGUST 15, 16, 21 & 22 PLC Schedule SHHS General Information for HS Campus Attendees Conference Schedule: 8:00 am to 4:00 pm Morning session sign.
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
2005 CALIFORNIA CASH FOR COLLEGE A Project of the California Student Aid Commission Workshop Evaluation Results April 30, 2005.
Summer 2014 Glenville State College Forensics Science Student and Teacher Post Evaluation Results.
College Application Week Ohio Appalachian Center for Higher Education.
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Course Evaluations at BYU-Idaho 1.
14 th Airway Management Course 11 th October 2011 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
Using iRubric For Surveys & Peer Evaluations Ramesh Sabetiashraf
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Course 1 : June 1 st – 2 nd 2015.
Welcome New Teachers New Teacher Orientation August 3, 2015 Meet with mentors in small groups Formal presentation at 12:00.
DEVELOPING PARENT INVOLVEMENT POLICIES Title I No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Section 1118.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Summer 2014 Fun With Science Student and Teacher Post Evaluation Results.
Support Staff Professional Portfolio Presenter: Mrs. Shirley J. Delgado M. A. Literacy Coach.
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
Membership Committee Activity: Annual Summary. Membership Committee Report Bi-monthly meetings with supplemental work sessions as necessary Bi-monthly.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
SOCCCD Collaborative CTE Grant Funded Externship Thu Nguyen Acting Project Director-TPP Counselor Irvine Valley College.
Ingleside workshops evaluation. Community Workshops 2 nd round workshops allowing input to draft structure plan Three sessions attended by 170 people.
Information Marketing Group, Inc. Student Success Plans.
PARTNERSHIPS FOR LEARNING NETWORK January 22, 2015 NEW SCHOOLS Professional Development Center Chino Valley Unified School District.
LEFT SIDE OF PAPER Gives a description of what you need to put on your slide.
Opening Frame The Issue Labels Traditional Cert Pathways
Evaluation Summary.
1. Reframing our specializations and M’Ed’s:
PBIS Focus/Reflection
Impact of School Culture: Part-Time MBA Programs
Evaluation Summary.
Shelton School District
Saint Joseph’s college of maine
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Shelton School District
A Maryland Blue Ribbon School of Excellence
Karolina Serafin, CLE Faculty Coordinator
Analyzing Access For ELL Scores
EVALUATION DISTRICT LEVEL STATE LEVEL NATIONAL LEVEL BEST TWO PROJECTS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR PARTICIPATION IN INDIAN SCIENCE CONGRESS.
Conference Survey How did you hear or learn about this conference?
A Maryland Blue Ribbon School of Excellence
FVP Review and Presentation of the SCPS Evergreen Study to the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors.
Hart County School District
Supporting Trusting Family Partnerships
End of Unit – self assessment
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Overall Evaluation Results 3/24/08 69% response rate
 We will be starting at 1:30 
Term 2 Interdisciplinary Project Empathy and Human Rights
Shelton School District
What are Pathways? By Your Names.
Student Student Evaluations of Fall 2010 Career Fair.
Term 2 Interdisciplinary Project Empathy and Human Rights
Evaluation Report Investigates a problem or a set of options.
2018 ClassiCON Participant Survey.
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
4th Quality Conference Update Johanna Nurmi.
Reporting Administrative Team Input Session
Norwin School District Title 1 or Reading Assistance Parent Survey
SL 2018 conference F’back 4-5 May 2018.
By Jonathan C. Mba ACE Coordinator
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
RM-MSMSP Evaluation Presentation for Leadership Team Meeting
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Summary Results 2016 CTE Conference Evaluation Summary Results

347 Participants by Sub Category # % Administrators 67 19.3% Math Teachers 4 1.2% Ag Science Teachers 81 23.3% Other 7 2.0% Business Ed Teachers 13 3.7% School Counselors 5 1.4% Business Reps Science Teachers CTE TAC SED 10 2.9% ELA Teachers Teaching Assistants 3 .9% ESL Teachers 2 .6% Tech Ed Teachers FACS Teachers 54 15.9% Trade & Tech 22 6.4% Health Science 17 4.9% WBL Coordinators Higher Ed 23 6.6% TOTAL 247 100%

Overall Satisfaction With: Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Weighted Average Event 73.81% 21.43% 4.64 Facility 70.24% 26.19% 4.65 Meal Selection 60.71% 27.38% 4.43%

Participants Rated the Following: Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Total Weighted Average Quality of Sessions 37.66% 44.16% 18.18% 0.00% 77 4.19 Variety of Vendors 33.33% 46.59% 17.95% 3.85% 1.28% 78 4.04

Why Did You Choose to Attend?

Key Note and Workshop Evaluation Ed Gerety – Keynote: 100% rated Good or above Workshops – 88.7% were rated Good or above Workshops -- 40.9% were rated Excellent (3 – 100% Excellent) Workshops – 11.3% were rated Poor to Fair Comments – 63.9% of the comments were positive Negative – Too many workshops to wanting more workshops to choose Better workshop descriptions – not so fancy Wanted hands on No coffee the first day/hotel rooms smelly

CTE Joint Conference Committee Recommendation for Next CTE Conference