MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
Advertisements

| 1 Developments in the Norwegian Model for Quality Assurance in Higher Education and the Role of NOKUT Developments in the Norwegian Model for.
1 Examining Supervisors and University Support for School Psychology Interns Wendy Cochrane, Kathleen Salyers, & Yi Ding The University of Toledo NASP.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Learning Outcomes and student workload in Higher Education Gerard Madill Policy Adviser, Universities Scotland.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Southern Regional Education Board 1 Preparing Students for Success in High School.
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
Raising Achievement. 2 Aims To explore approaches and materials to support the planning of learning. To consider strategies for preparing learners for.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
© Richard A. Medeiros 2004 x y Function Machine Function Machine next.
ECTS grade system in the curricula of Ruse University Principal Assist. Dr Desislava Atanasova.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
VOORBLAD.
Promoting Regulatory Excellence Self Assessment & Physiotherapy: the Ontario Model Jan Robinson, Registrar & CEO, College of Physiotherapists of Ontario.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
1..
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Seminar for Teacher Assistants
How creating a course on the e-lastic platform 1.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto — Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna — The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) eLearning and Virtual.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
PSSA Preparation.
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
BENGKEL PERSEDIAAN AUDIT PEMATUHAN & OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
Malaysian Qualifications Agency
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
THE MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
OBE Briefing.
ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 3 : KERTAS.
ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 ROADSHOW MQA.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
BENGKEL OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE). What are Learning Outcomes? i.Learning outcomes are statements of what students know and can do as a result of.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 1 : KERTAS.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE 11 JAN 2016 Guidelines To Setting Exam Questions in AMC.
OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE) 20 Ogos 2015
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MQF, MQA 01 and OBE Process
Student Learning Time (SLT).  Effective learning time or student effort of learning in order to achieve the specified learning outcomes.  Inclusive.
Student Learning Time (SLT)
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Student Learning Time (SLT)
Presentation transcript:

MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 3 : KERTAS 2 MQF IN PROGRAMMES MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY

What is the MQF? The MQF forms the basis of a benchmarked, flexible and integrated system of qualifications moving towards the national objective of knowledge and a lifelong learning society MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Impact of MQF The MQF, reflected in the QA documents, GUIDES the Agency, the HEP, related HE bodies/authorities and AFFECTS all programmes, systems, processes and activities pertaining to quality of higher education qualifications in Malaysia MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Impact on Quality Assurance Application of MQF Impact on Quality Assurance Impact on QA Documents Learning Outcomes Teaching and Learning Credit System MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

How Does MQF Affect Teaching-Learning? Teacher - centered Student - centered Contact hours Reflects Credit value Student Independent Learning Not Calculated Total SLT reflects Credit value Student independent Learning Time Calculated No mapping of learning outcomes Course Objective is the Learning Target Learning Outcomes is the Learning Target Mapping of learning outcomes necessary MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Lecturer-Centred to Student-Centred (incorporating SLT) Academic Activity (some examples) Face 2 Face Student Self- Learning* Total 1 Lecture 2 3 Tutorial Laboratory/Practical 5 4 Assignment - 2000 words 20 Presentation 6 30 36 Unaccounted for in the present system * Using the Proposed student independent learning in relation (Slide 17) MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

MQF Learning Outcomes MQF statement on what students should know, understand and can do upon completion of a period of study. In simple terms…. Specific, understandable, measurable, assessable and student-centered statements as to what a student will be able to do at the end of a period of study. MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

8 MQF Learning Outcome Domains Knowledge Social skills and responsibilities Communication, leadership and team skills Information management and lifelong learning skills Managerial and entrepreneurial skills Problem solving and scientific skills Values, attitudes and professionalism Practical Skills 7 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Categories and Mapping of Learning Outcomes Evidence/Mapping of Learning Outcomes Categories of Learning Outcomes (Para 14, MQF) qualifications fields of study programme module/subject Guided by Qualification Descriptors (MQF, Appendix 1) How are these made relevant to the specific requirements of the field of study? Map to curriculum and MQF Qualifications Descriptors Map to Assessment MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Planning MQF Credits MQF CREDITS Qualification Levels & Minimum Graduating Credits Teaching-Learning Activities MQF CREDITS NOTIONAL LEARNING TIME (1 Credit = 40 notional hours) SLT according to Student Band MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Achievement of Learning Outcomes Teaching/Learning + Assessment A credit the agreed-upon value used to measure a student workload in terms of learning time required to complete course units, resulting in learning outcomes’ (UNESCO, 2004) the measurement of students’ academic load Credit = Teaching Learning Activities Achievement of Learning Outcomes Revision Study Tour Case study Work attachment Lecture Tutorial Laboratory Group Discussion Field Work Clinical E-Learning Demonstration Industrial training Research Project Assignments Examination Studio work Project Work Group Assignment Presentation Directed reading Teaching/Learning + Assessment e.g. 4 800 notional SLT = 120 credits Total SLT 40 Credit Student Learning Time (SLT) MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Factors In Calculating Credit Face to Face / Guided Learning Time + Student Self Learning Time Total Assessment Time MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Student Categories and Learning Time 24 Hours Routine Activities Sleep Self-keep Travel Self improvement Activities Work Study Per day Time Student Total Division of Student Time Examples Hours per Week Least Diligent - 40 Diligent - 48 Very Diligent - 55 Good = diligent; weak = least diligent MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Examples 14 MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow Roz. MQF Credit System: Practice, Guidelines and Procedure MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow 14 14

5.8 semesters for a 120 credits bachelors Recommended Student Learning Time (For a diligent student & 17-weeks Semester) *17 weeks = 14 weeks of teaching, 1 week each for semester break, study break and examination 8 hours a day 48 hours a week 816 hours for 17-weeks* 20.4 credits per semester 5.8 semesters for a 120 credits bachelors MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Student Categories &130 credit Bachelors Least Diligent Very Diligent 1 Number of weeks in a semester (A) 17 2 Recommended SLT per week (B) 40 48 55 3 Recommended total SLT per semester (C) [A x B] 680 816 935 4 Recommended credit per semester (D) [C ÷ 4o] 20 (20.4) 23 (23.4) 5 Total graduating credit for programme (E) 130 6 Number of semesters (long semester) (F) [E ÷ D] 7.6 (7.64) 6.5 5.7 (5.65) 7 Number of academic year (2 long semesters 1 year) [F ÷ 2] 3.8 3.3 (3.25) 2.9 (2.85) MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Proposed student independent learning time Item Duration (hours) or requirements Proposed Student Self Learning Time (hours) Lecture 1 1-2 Tutorial Tutorial (involving case studies) 3 Laboratory (including report writing) 2-3 Undergraduate Final Year Project/ Dissertation 6 - 10 credits 200 - 400 Studio Work 2 Presentation 3-4 Coursework/Assignment 2000 words 10 - 12 Creative Writing (or a project that last a whole semester) 100 – 150 pages 8-10 Examination 10 – 20* Source: Bengkel Kebangsaan Pemantapan Sistem Kredit MQF, 31 Jan. – 2 Feb. 2005 by Quality Assurance Division, Ministry of Higher Education (Malaysia). * Proposed by MQA, depending on the field of study and the intensity of the examination. MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Learning Outcomes and Student Learning Time (A subject with 6 learning outcomes and 1.5 credit hours) Learning Outcomes Lecture Tute Self -learning Total SLT 1 explain the types of contracts; 2 3 6 distinguish between offer, acceptance and an invitation to treat; 5 10 differentiate the types considerations; 4 describe the principles concerning termination and breach of contract; Summarise principles of damages; Examine, analyse, compile, apply and justify the principles of contract in given scenario. 9 - Assessment (1 coursework and one 3-hour examinations) 12 16 63 MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Module Academic Load & Credits Learning Activities SLT (in hours) 1 Lectures (54) a Attending Lectures 24 b Pre and Post preparation* 30 2 Tutorial (18) Attending tutorial 9 Preparation for tutorial* 3 Laboratory (36) Practical Prepreparation and Report writing* 12 Learning Activities SLT (in hours) 4 Assessments (23) a. 1 continuos assessement (1 hour + 3 hours preparation*) b. 1 presentation (1 hour + 5 hours preparation*) 6 c. 1 Final Examination (3 hour + 10 hours preparation*) 13 Total 131 Subject Credit (131 ÷ 40 = 3.27) 3 * See Proposed student independent learning in relation (Slide 17) MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Credits per semester Genetics 42 (2+1) 42 26 16 126 3 Biochemistry Modules Face to Face Learning Independent Learning Lab Hours Evaluation Total SLT Credit 1 Genetics 42 (2+1) 42 26 16 126 3 2 Biochemistry Cell Biology 12 112 4 ICT 28 (2+1) 28 14 10 80 5 English 63 7 127 6 Moral/Islamic Studies 28 (1+1) Anatomy 70 (3+2) 128 294 301 92 91 778 19 MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

The Big Picture MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow Learning Outcomes What students will be able to do? Credits The yardstick to measure student learning. MQF The frame within which students’ learning is pegged. MQA The Agency that holds all together. The Big Picture MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow

Thank You