Emma Baple and Dom McMullan 20th February 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VUS: The clinician’s view Mary Porteous On behalf of Scottish Clinical Geneticists.
Advertisements

Organization of Diabetes Care Chapter 6 Maureen Clement, Betty Harvey, Doreen M Rabi, Robert S Roscoe, Diana Sherifali Canadian Diabetes Association 2013.
Standard 6: Clinical Handover
The key steps in an annual cycle Produce the annual work programme Create an annual Internal Audit plan for approval by the Audit Committee, typically.
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
Everyone Counts: Planning for Patients (Focus on changes regarding ≥75yrs and those with complex needs) 1.
The role of the Secretary at Academic Approval and Periodic Review events Quality Assurance Services February 2015.
ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines: Consensus Conference (CC) SOP Edited by EDC-SC September 2013.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
National /14 Internal Assessment Operational Aspects of Quality Assurance.
Using test data to improve performance Patrick Griffin.
100k Genomes Project Programme of Whole Genome Sequencing, part of UK Life Sciences Strategy Aim to sequence 100,000 genomes from patients with cancer.
SMC and the role of Public Involvement Action Duchenne Scottish Mini Conference 4 December 2015 Lindsay Lockhart Public Involvement Officer.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Ethics in Clinical Genetics and Genomics Key Knowledge Year 4 Medical Ethics and Law Thread Course, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Peer Review for Paediatric Diabetes Ruth Bridgeman.
Development of Assessments Laura Mason Consultant.
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Delivered by supported by. What is the National Epistaxis Audit? A UK-wide two-cycle prospective audit of in-hospital epistaxis management and outcomes.
Welcome Debriefing – Level 1 Main title slide page
Implementation of Quality indicators for administrative data
National Healthcare Science Week 2017
NHSE Commissioning update
MRCGP The Clinical Skills Assessment January 2013.
Patient Involvement in the HTA Decision Making Process
An HN Accounting Practitioner’s Academic Year
MUHC Innovation Model.
Charles Crawley Presidents update Nov 16
Functional Skills Reform Programme Consultation January – July 2016
Report by the VICH Steering Committee on issues raised by Forum members during the 1st Outreach Forum meeting Hervé Marion, DVM VICH Secretariat.
Purpose of referencing
Clinical Study Results Publication
MANCOSA Honours Marketing Research.
DUET.
Box 3. Steps in the development of the revised 2010 Kenyan pediatric treatment guidelines 1. Establishment of guideline development group / evidence summary.
CRUK working group MDT effectiveness proposal
TCPI Project Pathway: Session 3 of 8 Staff Engagement: Teamwork and Joy # 6 and 19 (24) To QIA for possible use: Thank you for taking my call and listening.
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Content and Labeling of Tests Marketed as Clinical “Whole-Exome Sequencing” Perspectives from a cancer genetics clinician and clinical lab director Allen.
Standard of Electronic Health Record
Survey phases, survey errors and quality control system
MEDICAL CERTIFICATION OF Cause of death THE ROLE OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE Samoa 2017.
STAFF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT IN-SERVICE
Genomics Education Programme
Neuro Oncology Therapy Update
Diagnosis General Guidelines:
Survey phases, survey errors and quality control system
100,000 Genomes Project & Mainstreaming Genomic Medicine
Sandra Winterburn, Senior Lecturer & Consultation Skills Lead
Informed Consent (SBER)
Principal recommendations
Compliance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000
Marilyn M. Li, Michael Datto, Eric J
Adapted from a presentation at the Rwanda First National Workshop on
Synthesizing Evidence Found
Inter-Agency Referral Discussion
GTAB/MTB working and terms of reference
Variant Triaging and ESMO Guidelines
Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting Reforms
Patient centred care & Concept of Multidisciplinary team (MDT) Mr A A Ayantunde, MD; FRCS; FWACS, FRCS (Gen & Colorectal Surgery) Consultant Laparoscopic.
Joint BES/BBS Seminar Patient Preference Studies – Introduction
The Role of the Cardiovascular Nurse Alison de Vries
Quality Surveillance Programme
Cancer Validation and Reporting Guidance Update 4th June 2016
Contributor Roles, Open Badges
Dr Sarah Heap National Audit Meeting th September 2018
Impact of quality on day-to-day efforts of PHC
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
Presentation transcript:

Emma Baple and Dom McMullan 20th February 2018 MDM guidelines Emma Baple and Dom McMullan 20th February 2018

Next generation sequencing is (relatively) straightforward Variant interpretation is not…

Transformation of Genomic MDT meetings The bioinformatics pipeline was designed to retain rare variants by ……. (highlight MAF) Does this variant in this gene fit this patient’s phenotype?

MDT working group meeting 30th January 2018 Ed Blair, Dom McMullan, David Hunt, Ellen Thomas, Phil Twiss, Frances Elmslie, Julia Baptista, Ana Beleza, Thalia Antoniadi , Emma Baple, Arianna Tucci, Li Chan, Emma Clement, Ian Berry, Helen Brittain, Sandra Hing, Sarah Bowdin , Jo Mason, David Ghokale, Anthony Prudhoe, Wook Ahn, (Christine Patch, Michelle Bishop, Martina Muggenthaler, Kate Thompson, Georgina Hall)

MDT working group meeting 30th January 2018 10.40-10.50: The CRG and Genomic MDTs (Frances Elmslie) 10.50-11.00: Update on the standardised genomic report template (Sian Ellard) 11.00-11.15: Experiences of mainstreaming at Toronto Sickkids Hospital (Sarah Bowdin) 11.15-12.15: Group work to develop a draft MDT outcome form as an appendix for the standardised report (Emma Baple/Dominic McMullan) 13.30 – 14.30: Group work to develop draft guidelines for Genomic MDTs With recognition that there will be variability locally, the discussion will be around looking at the role of different types of MDTs, governance, responsibilities and expectations of attendees. 15.15-15.30: Future plans

Aims To develop a standardised MDM summary form to be incorporated as an appendix to the standardised report template To develop MDM guidelines as part of the Rare Disease Validation and Reporting guidelines

MDM summary form and guidelines plan Brief survey about current practice circulated to NHSE validation and reporting working group Provide examples of current MDM summary forms and guidelines Meeting of working group Iterative work on MDM summary form Incorporate into NHSE Rare Disease Validation and Reporting Guidelines Iterative work on MDM Guidelines

Standard report template

Standard report template

MDM guideline development MDM can involve face to face meeting, Webex, telephone, email and in the future possibly via CIP/other electronic interface Avoid multiple bystanders Clearly defined roles Different types of MDT: Decision making/Educational and training (record attendee names and roles) Smaller groups for decision making MDTs Remember MDTs are expensive MDM coordinator MDM chair

MDM guideline development Questions to be answered should be circulated in advance of the MDM Any relevant publications and collated evidence should be circulated prior to the MDM Joint clinical scientist and clinician preparation for MDM Those attending the MDM should come prepared so that informed decisions can be made

MDM guideline development Clinical scientists are responsible for collation and assessment of the scientific aspects of variant classification Clinician input generally relates to 4 areas: Does the phenotype fit the gene/variant? Are there additional family members who could provide a sample for segregation? Is there further phenotype information for the proband or family members which would provide additional evidence? Is there an expert who might know more and be willing to help? Actionable versus not actionable NHSE are investigating the legal issues around accountability for MDM outcomes

MDM guideline development MDM discussion and outcomes that influence the variant classification for variants included in the report should be documented as part of the appendix summarising the evidence for variant classification MDM summary form should be held in the laboratory linked to the report as a permanent record and for audit purposes but not circulated with the report Treatment and management may be discussed as part of the MDM, but any recommendation and decisions should be left to the referring clinician/clinical team

MDM summary form

MDM summary form

Other areas of discussion Guidelines for incidental findings to enable a consistent approach nationally Negative cases and additional analyses – indications and timeline New phenotype or family information, new published evidence for a gene/group of genes Webex security – NHSE investigating the use of N3 Webex Guidelines for which cases require more comprehensive MDT Who should attend the MDT