Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.
Advertisements

Evaluation of CAFE scenarios and outstanding modelling issues Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
PM work plan under the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Henning Wuester Secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
Marion Wichmann-Fiebig II 5 Abteilungsleiterin „Luft“ 1 Review of the Gothenburg Protocol Link to potential PM control under CLRTAP: – Specifies control.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
Emission control scenarios for EU and non-EU countries M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Meeting of.
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe. The Problem Svante Oden (1968): “The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences.” SOx, NOx -> transported.
The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Emission control potentials in non-EU countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Workshop on Interaction between Air-Quality Monitoring and Air-protection Strategies in EECCA Countries UN ECE WGEMA, June 11, 2007 Draft Strategy for.
Coordination Centre for Effects Jean-Paul Hettelingh, EC4MACS kick off meeting, IIASA, 6-7 March 2007 EC4MACS Task 3: Ecosystem Impact Assessment by the.
Cost-effective measures to achieve further improvements of air quality in Europe ( focus on key measures in the EECCA and Balkan countries) Based on presentation.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
Agenda and introduction to the session Alexander Romanov SRI Stefan Åström IVL.
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling Review of the Gothenburg Protocol UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC.
Information on NECD and Gothenburg Protocol revisions Eduard Dame DG Environment European Commission Energy & Environment.
Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress on modelling emission scenarios.
Review of the Gothenburg Protocol: WGSR Conclusions Review of the Gothenburg Protocol: WGSR Conclusions 8th Joint TFEIP/EIONET Meeting Dublin, October.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
RAINS Review Review of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model Contract with CAFE Dec Sept 2004.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
International and National Abatement Strategies for Transboundary air Pollution New concepts and methods for effect-based strategies on transboundary air.
Data sources for GAINS Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
Preparations for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol Report to the WGSR September 2006 Markus Amann et al., EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling.
1 Monitoring and assessment in Europe Joining forces between EMEP and EEA Roel van Aalst 30 May 2001.
Scenarios for the Negotiations on the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol with contributions from Imrich Bertok, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Chris.
The MINNI Project and RAINS-Italy Italian Agency for New Technologies Energy and the Environment Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention TFIAM.
Developments in Critical Loads and Dynamic Modelling Maximilian Posch Coordination Center for Effects (CCE) ICP Modelling & Mapping (ICP M&M) Working Group.
An outlook to future air quality in Europe: Priorities for EMEP and WGE from an Integrated Assessment perspective Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Clean Air for Europe TFIAM Conference Planning of the CAFE programme AMIENS May 2004 André Zuber & Matti Vainio Environment DG - European Commission TFIAM.
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling 31 st and 32 nd meeting 8-9 December 2005, Gothenburg,
TFIAM 36 th meeting Laxenburg, 6-7 October 2009 draft chairmans report available as informal document.
Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Inventory issues – Gothenburg Protocol – RAINS TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.
Clean Air for Europe CAFE workplan CAFE WG TS PA 16 June André Zuber European.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Uniform limit value for air quality: Bring down PM2.5 everywhere below a AQ limit value Gap closure concept: Reduce PM2.5 levels everywhere by same.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
IIASA Riku Suutari, Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont Wolfgang Schöpp A methodology to propagate uncertainties through the RAINS scenario calculations.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
The CAMS Policy products
Air pollution in Europe and Asia From Science to Policy
Preparations for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol
Progress on modelling emission scenarios
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Emission Projections for 2020
CAFE baseline dissemination workshop
Changes to the methodology since the NEC report #2
Ad-hoc stakeholder consultation meeting on the CAFE baseline scenario in agriculture Welcome October 8, 2003 Stakeholder consultation on CAFE baseline.
CAFE baseline dissemination workshop
Environmental targets for the NEC analysis
Stakeholder consultation meeting on the CAFE baseline scenario Welcome 30 April, 2004 CAFE BASELINE SCENARIO STAKEHOLDER MEETING, 30 April, 2003.
9th CAFE Steering Group meeting
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Tentative Ideas for Co-operation
Revised emission reporting Guidelines – Projection issues
Presentation transcript:

Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol

RAINS improvements since the Gothenburg Protocol Source-receptor relationships from EMEP Eulerian model (50*50 km) For acid deposition, N deposition, ozone, PM2.5 Ecosystem-specific deposition Health impact assessment for ozone based on SOMO35 Health impact assessment for PM, including differentiation for urban air quality (City-Delta) Latest critical loads implemented, interface to dynamic models Emission inventories, projections and control potentials for primary PM emissions Inclusion of non-technical measures under development (GAINS)

Status of input data For EU countries + Norway + Switzerland: Emission inventories, national energy/transport/agriculture projections (19 countries), emission control potentials and costs validated (mainly for 2020 and 2015) For other countries in the (old) EMEP domain Data available, but not validated (consultations with Ukraine and Russia underway) For other countries in the extended EMEP domain and North America: Model not implemented

What can be done in 2006/2007? “Baseline projection” of emissions and resulting air quality impacts For “current national legislations”, ignoring Gothenburg ceilings and EU NECs Based on national activity projections For 2015 and 2020, indicative assessment for 2010 Based on latest impact assessment methodologies Draft projection in fall 2006 Preliminary results presented to WGSR 9/2006 Comments by Parties until end 2006 Final projection in spring 2007 (for TFIAM)

What cannot be done in 2006/2007? No (re-)optimization of emission ceilings in 2007 For 2010 data not validated with Parties For 2015 and 2020 policy debate about target setting necessary