Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of Bacteriophage T4 RNase H, a 5′ to 3′ RNA–DNA and DNA–DNA Exonuclease with Sequence Similarity to the RAD2 Family of Eukaryotic Proteins 
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
The structural basis for pyrophosphatase catalysis
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Crystal structure of the ternary complex of 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea with NADPH and an active-site inhibitor  Arnold.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 1999)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal structure of the wide-spectrum binuclear zinc β-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis  Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 823-836 (July 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5

Figure 1 The fold of B. fragilis metallo-β-lactamase. (a) Ribbon diagram highlighting secondary structure motifs. Helices and β strands are colored blue and gold, respectively. The zinc metal ions in the active site are shown as red spheres and are located at the top edge of the β sandwich. The dotted line corresponds to the positions of the two conformationally disordered residues (48 and 49) in the vicinity of the active site. (The figure was generated with Molscript [69] and rendered with Raster3D [70] using the 2.0 version [71] and a TCL-TK front-end developed by H Gilson [unpublished program].) (b) Stereoscopic representation of the trace of the Cα atom positions, shown in the same orientation as (a). The position of every tenth residue is numbered. (c) Topographical diagram of the arrangement of the secondary structure elements of β-lactamase. Triangles represent β strands and circles represent α helices, the N and C termini are marked. To indicate that it is not part of the α/β layer α3 is shown in white. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 1 The fold of B. fragilis metallo-β-lactamase. (a) Ribbon diagram highlighting secondary structure motifs. Helices and β strands are colored blue and gold, respectively. The zinc metal ions in the active site are shown as red spheres and are located at the top edge of the β sandwich. The dotted line corresponds to the positions of the two conformationally disordered residues (48 and 49) in the vicinity of the active site. (The figure was generated with Molscript [69] and rendered with Raster3D [70] using the 2.0 version [71] and a TCL-TK front-end developed by H Gilson [unpublished program].) (b) Stereoscopic representation of the trace of the Cα atom positions, shown in the same orientation as (a). The position of every tenth residue is numbered. (c) Topographical diagram of the arrangement of the secondary structure elements of β-lactamase. Triangles represent β strands and circles represent α helices, the N and C termini are marked. To indicate that it is not part of the α/β layer α3 is shown in white. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 1 The fold of B. fragilis metallo-β-lactamase. (a) Ribbon diagram highlighting secondary structure motifs. Helices and β strands are colored blue and gold, respectively. The zinc metal ions in the active site are shown as red spheres and are located at the top edge of the β sandwich. The dotted line corresponds to the positions of the two conformationally disordered residues (48 and 49) in the vicinity of the active site. (The figure was generated with Molscript [69] and rendered with Raster3D [70] using the 2.0 version [71] and a TCL-TK front-end developed by H Gilson [unpublished program].) (b) Stereoscopic representation of the trace of the Cα atom positions, shown in the same orientation as (a). The position of every tenth residue is numbered. (c) Topographical diagram of the arrangement of the secondary structure elements of β-lactamase. Triangles represent β strands and circles represent α helices, the N and C termini are marked. To indicate that it is not part of the α/β layer α3 is shown in white. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 2 The active site of the B. fragilis metallo-β-lactamase. The molecular surface of the enzyme is depicted together with a model of a bound molecule of benzylpenicillin (colored red). The benzyl side chain fits into a hydrophobic pocket. The zinc ions are represented as magenta spheres and two key water molecules as blue spheres. The disordered residues, 48 and 49, and the side chain of Glu50 are colored light blue. (The figure was generated with GRASP [72]). Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 3 The environment of the binuclear zinc centre in the metallo-β-lactamase from B. fragilis. (a) Stereoscopic representation of the atomic model of the active site. The zinc and metal-bound solvent molecules are represented as magenta and turquoise spheres, respectively. The color-coding used in this figure is used throughout. Main-chain bonds are colored gray, negatively charged residues are colored in varying intensities of red, positively charged residues are in purples, hydrophobic residues in greens, browns and yellows, and hydrophilic residues are shown in pinks and oranges. Zinc–ligand interactions are shown as orange dotted lines. Other key electrostatic interactions are shown as gray dotted lines. Zn1 is tetrahedrally coordinated and Zn2 is penta-coordinated. The two water molecules are labeled Wat 1 and Wat 2. (b) Stereoscopic view of the electron-density map in the vicinity of the active site. The coefficients 2Fo–Fc and calculated phases are used. The map is contoured at 1.2σ level. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 3 The environment of the binuclear zinc centre in the metallo-β-lactamase from B. fragilis. (a) Stereoscopic representation of the atomic model of the active site. The zinc and metal-bound solvent molecules are represented as magenta and turquoise spheres, respectively. The color-coding used in this figure is used throughout. Main-chain bonds are colored gray, negatively charged residues are colored in varying intensities of red, positively charged residues are in purples, hydrophobic residues in greens, browns and yellows, and hydrophilic residues are shown in pinks and oranges. Zinc–ligand interactions are shown as orange dotted lines. Other key electrostatic interactions are shown as gray dotted lines. Zn1 is tetrahedrally coordinated and Zn2 is penta-coordinated. The two water molecules are labeled Wat 1 and Wat 2. (b) Stereoscopic view of the electron-density map in the vicinity of the active site. The coefficients 2Fo–Fc and calculated phases are used. The map is contoured at 1.2σ level. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 4 Amino acid sequence alignment of five metallo-β-lactamases. The B. fragilis (BACFR) and B. cereus (BACCE) β-lactamase sequences were aligned first. The remaining sequences from Serratia marscescens (SEMAR), Aeromonas hydrophilia (AERHY), and Xanthomonas maltophilia (XAMAL) were aligned against the first two using secondary structure-dependent gap penalties [73,74]. A few more changes to the automatic multiple alignment improved the conservation of the binuclear zinc fingerprint. Shaded boxes indicate zinc coordinating residues, and unshaded boxed residues are proposed to be critical for substrate binding. Secondary structure elements were assigned using DSSP and are shown above the sequence [75]. The numbering corresponds to the sequence of the B. fragilis enzyme. The matrix at the bottom of the figure summarizes the level of amino acid sequence identity. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 5 Stereoscopic representation of the environment of Asp69, a buried aspartate residue with a sterically strained main-chain conformation. The coloring scheme is as described in the legend to Figure 3a. The sodium cation is represented as a dark purple sphere. With the exception of two water molecules, Wat1 and Wat2, all solvent molecules are internal. Zinc–ligand interactions are shown as orange dotted lines. Other key electrostatic interactions are shown as gray dotted lines. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 6 Models of β-lactam substrates bound in the active site of the metallo-β-lactamase from B. fragilis. The substrates, shown in magenta, are: (a) ampicillin, (b) ceftazidime and (c) imipenem. The corresponding chemical structures are displayed on the right. The coloring scheme is as described in the legend of Figure 3a. In addition, the dark blue dotted line shows the shared hydroxide's proposed line of attack on the carbonyl carbon of the substrate. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 6 Models of β-lactam substrates bound in the active site of the metallo-β-lactamase from B. fragilis. The substrates, shown in magenta, are: (a) ampicillin, (b) ceftazidime and (c) imipenem. The corresponding chemical structures are displayed on the right. The coloring scheme is as described in the legend of Figure 3a. In addition, the dark blue dotted line shows the shared hydroxide's proposed line of attack on the carbonyl carbon of the substrate. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 6 Models of β-lactam substrates bound in the active site of the metallo-β-lactamase from B. fragilis. The substrates, shown in magenta, are: (a) ampicillin, (b) ceftazidime and (c) imipenem. The corresponding chemical structures are displayed on the right. The coloring scheme is as described in the legend of Figure 3a. In addition, the dark blue dotted line shows the shared hydroxide's proposed line of attack on the carbonyl carbon of the substrate. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)

Figure 7 Fluorescence X-ray absorption spectrum of the single crystal of zinc β-lactamase from B. fragilis used for data collection. X-ray diffraction data were collected at nominal incident X-ray energies of 9.6575 (λ1), 9.6637 (λ2) and 9.9188 (λ3) keV. F is measured in arbitrary units. Structure 1996 4, 823-836DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00089-5)