Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Advertisements

Implications of somatic mutations in the AML1 gene in radiation-associated and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia by Hironori.
A TPR Motif Cofactor Contributes to p300 Activity in the p53 Response
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Leah Rosin, Barbara G. Mellone  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Differential influence of tyrosine residues of the common receptor β subunit on multiple signals induced by human GM-CSF  Tohru Itoh, PhD, Rui Liu, MSc,
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
The Interferon-Inducible MxB Protein Inhibits HIV-1 Infection
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Dynamins Are Forever: MxB Inhibits HIV-1
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Identification of the HIV-1 Vif and Human APOBEC3G Protein Interface
Rui Pedro Galão, Suzanne Pickering, Rachel Curnock, Stuart J.D. Neil 
HIV-1 Vpu Mediates HLA-C Downregulation
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Coiled Coils Direct Assembly of a Cold-Activated TRP Channel
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Colin Kwok, Bernd B. Zeisig, Shuo Dong, Chi Wai Eric So  Cancer Cell 
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
The Host Restriction Factor APOBEC3G and Retroviral Vif Protein Coevolve due to Ongoing Genetic Conflict  Alex A. Compton, Vanessa M. Hirsch, Michael.
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
TNF-Induced Activation of the Nox1 NADPH Oxidase and Its Role in the Induction of Necrotic Cell Death  You-Sun Kim, Michael J. Morgan, Swati Choksi, Zheng-gang.
Hepatitis C Virus Subverts Liver-Specific miR-122 to Protect the Viral Genome from Exoribonuclease Xrn2  Cecilia D. Sedano, Peter Sarnow  Cell Host &
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Herpes Simplex Virus Suppresses Necroptosis in Human Cells
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
KCNE1 Binds to the KCNQ1 Pore to Regulate Potassium Channel Activity
Poxviral B1 Kinase Overcomes Barrier to Autointegration Factor, a Host Defense against Virus Replication  Matthew S. Wiebe, Paula Traktman  Cell Host.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Michael S. Kuhns, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Origins and Evolution of tetherin, an Orphan Antiviral Gene
Takashi Hayashi, Gareth M. Thomas, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Global Analysis of Palmitoylated Proteins in Toxoplasma gondii
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
An Inhibitory Activity in Human Cells Restricts the Function of an Avian-like Influenza Virus Polymerase  Andrew Mehle, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell Host.
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Regulation of KSHV Lytic Switch Protein Expression by a Virus-Encoded MicroRNA: An Evolutionary Adaptation that Fine-Tunes Lytic Reactivation  Priya Bellare,
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
HIV-1 Vif Adaptation to Human APOBEC3H Haplotypes
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 598-604 (October 2012) Evolution-Guided Identification of Antiviral Specificity Determinants in the Broadly Acting Interferon-Induced Innate Immunity Factor MxA  Patrick S. Mitchell, Corinna Patzina, Michael Emerman, Otto Haller, Harmit S. Malik, Georg Kochs  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 598-604 (October 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.005 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Evolution of Primate MxA (A) The phylogeny was built using orthologous MxA sequences from 24 primate species (Figure S1 and Table S1), which is congruent with a previously published primate phylogeny (Perelman et al., 2011). (B) The loop L4 (amino acids 533-572) protein sequence alignment is shown from representative primates (top). Specific codons found to be evolving under positive selection in primate MxA are indicated in a linear schematic (middle) or a model of the MxA crystal structure (bottom) (Gao et al., 2011), where sites with a posterior probability greater than 0.95 and 0.99 are highlighted in orange and red, respectively. In the linear structure “B” depicts the three parts of MxA that form the bundle-signaling element (BSE). (C) Evolutionary analysis for positive selection in primate MxA. P values generated from maximum likelihood ratio tests that fit the data to models of neutral (M7) or adaptive (M8) evolution are given for the entire MxA coding sequence (including or excluding new world monkey (NWM) sequences) or specific domains of the protein as indicated. i. Percentage of codons evolving under positive selection (p1). ii. Associated average dN/dS (ω) of p1 sites. iii. Codons with a high posterior probability (PP > 0.90) that supports the likelihood of a site having a dN/dS > 1 are presented with the PP for each residue in parentheses. Amino acids refer to residues found at indicated positions in hsMxA. iv. Indels removed from alignment. v. StalkΔL4 refers to an analysis of the stalk with amino acids 533-572 removed. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 598-604DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.005) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Species-Specific Antiviral Activity Results from Sequence Divergence in Loop L4 of Primate MxA (A) THOV minireplicon activity (luciferase levels) was measured 24h post-transfection, and was reported relative to levels observed in the absence of MxA. hsMxA(T103A) is an antivirally inactive mutant of hsMxA. Error bars represent standard deviation across three biological replicates. HA-tagged MxA and βactin protein levels were detected in lysates by Western blot. The phylogenetic relationships of MxA derived from representative species within hominoid, old world monkey and new world monkey lineages are indicated by a cladogram. (B) Differential antiviral activity of human and AGM MxA orthologs is dependent on loop L4. The loop L4 (amino acids 556-572) protein sequence alignment is shown with positively selected sites that differ between hsMxA and agmMxA in gray (top). Dose-responsiveness of the antiviral activity of wild-type MxA and L4 chimeras was determined by cotransfecting increasing amounts of MxA expression constructs with the THOV minireplicon into 293T cells. MxA antiviral activity is measured as described in Figure 2A (middle). The Western blot analysis depicts the expression levels of the recombinant MxA proteins in the cell lysates (bottom). (C) Restriction of THOV infectivity by human and AGM MxA is contingent on a single amino acid. Data are presented as percent THOV infected, Mx-positive cells as measured by immunofluorescence for THOV NP and MxA. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates. ∗∗∗p < 0.0001 (t test). See also Figure S2. (D) Antiviral activity of hsMxA 561 variants. Data are presented as described in Figure 2A. ∗∗p < 0.001 (t test) for values compared to hsMxA(T103A). Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 598-604DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.005) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Loop L4 Is a Functional Module of MxA Antiviral Activity (A) Human L4 rescues mouse Mx1 antiviral activity against the THOV minireplicon. mmMx1 expression constructs were cotransfected with the THOV minireplicon system into 293T cells; the experiment was otherwise carried out as in Figure 2B. mmMx1(hsL4) contains an exchange of mmL4 for the L4 of hsMxA. mmMx1(K49A) is a GTPase inactive mutant with no antiviral activity. (B) Human L4 determines the antiviral activity of mmMx1 against THOV infection. Percent infectivity was measured as described in Figure 2C. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates. ∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (C) L4 mediates the interaction between MxA and THOV NP. Coimmunoprecipitation of viral NP with hsMxA and mmMx1 proteins was performed with lysates of THOV-infected (+) or uninfected (-) 293T cells transfected with the indicated Flag-tagged Mx expression constructs. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-Flag-affinity gel and the precipitated proteins were detected by Western blot with viral NP and MxA-specific antibodies. The lower panel shows the input of viral NP, MxA and β-tubulin in whole cell lysates. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 598-604DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.005) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Loop L4 Mediates Functional Differences in Primate MxA Antiviral Activity against Influenza A Virus Restriction of A/Thailand/1/04 infection by hsMxA and agmMxA. Data are presented as percent of infected, Mx-positive cells as measured by immunofluorescence for viral NP and MxA. Error bars represent standard deviation of three biological replicates. ∗∗∗p < 0.0001 (t test). Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 598-604DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.005) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions