SB 192 – Oil and Gas Production Tax Rate/Credit Sponsored by Senator Bert Stedman Senate Resources April 9, 2014 SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
C HAPTER Elasticity of Demand and Supply price elasticities of demand and supply, income and cross elasticities of demand, and using elasticity to forecast.
Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
Corporation Tax Michael Devereux Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation and Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
Learning to show the remainder
ZMQS ZMQS
FY15 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 22, 2014.
MASBO February Bi-Monthly Meeting February Doubletree Inn, Milford MA Update on C70 and Other Funding In Governors Budget Roger Hatch and Jay Sullivan.
OBJECTIVES Reduce the amount of proposed tax increase we are asking from our citizens from.35 to.25 while maintaining current service levels. Where possible.
Introduction to Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume Relationships
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
Spring 2008, King Saud University Cash Flow Analysis Dr. Khalid Al-Gahtani 1 Payment schedule Materials Mobilization Monthly payments Final Payment Contract.
Fixed and Variable Costs. Median income per household member in the U.S. in 2006 was in the range from: 1)$15,000-20,000 2)$20,000-25,000 3)$25,000-30,000.
1 Price Risk Management and the Futures Market Hedging.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Capital Budgeting Cash Flows.
Capital Budgeting Cash Flow
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date A reduction in fatal casualties Who, why and what does this mean? Louise.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Eleven Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and CVP Analysis.
The Oil Majors and the US Geo- Strategy in Eurasia after the End of Cold War Anthony Livanios CEO Energy Stream CMG GmbH January 21, 2014.
Reporting and Interpreting Cost of Goods Sold and Inventory
Measuring the Economy’s Performance
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
VOORBLAD.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
Elasticity of Demand and Supply
Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 5–7) Main Idea and Vocabulary Key Concept: Percent of Change Example 1:Real-World Example: Find Percent of Change.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Merchandising Activities Chapter 6.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
12 Financial Management 12-1 Financial Planning
Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9
Solanco School District Preliminary Budget April 28, 2014.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Ch.11 Shareholders’ Equity
Copyright © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Cost-Revenue Analysis for Decision Making
© 2006, François Brouard Case Real Group François Brouard, DBA, CA January 6, 2006.
Changing Alaska's Oil and Gas Production Taxes: Issues and Consequences Matthew Berman Professor of Economics Institute of Social and Economic Research.
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee Department of Revenue Comments on CSSB 192.
Presentation transcript:

SB 192 – Oil and Gas Production Tax Rate/Credit Sponsored by Senator Bert Stedman Senate Resources April 9, 2014 SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 1

Make Alaska Competitive Repeal the SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 2

History of Alaskas Oil Tax Regimes Economic Limit Factor ELF ( ) Petroleum Production Tax PPT ( ) Alaskas Clear and Equitable Share ACES ( ) Senate Bill 21 (2014-Present) SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 3

ELF ( ) Severance tax rate of 15% Multiplied by a fraction between 0 and 1 If the ELF was 0.5, the effective tax rate would be 7.5% SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 4

Problems with ELF Natural field decline reduced the tax rate regardless of price In 2007, Kuparuks economic limit factor was X.065 = 0.98% The severance tax for North Americas second largest oil basin was less than one percent 15 of the 19 operating fields paid 0% tax rate SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 5

PPT ( ) Base tax rate is 22.5% of net value after deducting costs Introduced progressivity element when net value per barrel > $40/bbl (Net value per barrel - $40) X.0025 So if oil price is $100 per barrel: – Net value per barrel is about $70 – Progressivity is ($70 - $40) X.0025 = 7.5% – Total tax rate is 22.5% + 7.5% = 30% – Tax is 30% X $70 = $21 per barrel SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 6

Problems with PPT Deductible costs were higher than expected Revenues were less than expected Tainted by VECO corruption scandal SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 7

ACES ( ) Base tax rate is 25% of net value after deducting costs Progressivity element when net value per barrel > $30/bbl (Net value per barrel - $30) X.004 So if oil price is $100 per barrel: – Net value per barrel is about $70 – Progressivity is ($70 - $30) X.004 = 16% – Total tax rate is 25% + 16% = 41% – Production tax is 41% X $70 = $28.70 per barrel SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 8

Problems with ACES Progressivity rate was too high resulting in an unfair split of profit oil between producers and the state Excessive credits driving adverse economic behavior Complexity SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 9

Credits under ACES Capital credit - 20% Well lease expenditure credit (excluding North Slope) - 40% Exploration credit - 20% - 40% depending on location Small producer credit - $12 million if sufficient offsetting income Loss carry-forward credit - 25% of annual loss SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 10

Senate Bill 21 (2014-Present) Base tax rate is 35% of net value after deducting costs Per barrel tax credit between $1 - $8 based on Alaska North Slope (ANS) wellhead value 20% - 30% Gross Revenue Exclusion for new production Monetization of net operating losses – 45% through 2015 and 35% thereafter Minimum tax is 4% of gross value at point of production $12 million small producer tax credit SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 11

Problems with SB 21 Per barrel tax credits are too high and not contingent on any performance measures In FY15, the per barrel tax credits will cost the state almost one billion dollars 4% minimum tax is too low The states risk exposure increases as oil prices drop Regressive tax structure without the per barrel tax credit Bottom Line: Alaskans share of hydrocarbon value from the legacy fields is too low SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 12

Senate Bill 192 SB 192 cuts the per barrel credits in half Almost half a billion dollars in revenue per year Raises the minimum tax from 4% to 15% of gross value at point of production As oil prices go down and credits go up, a higher minimum tax is needed to protect the states share of its resource wealth from legacy fields No revenue impact at current oil price SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 13

Per Barrel Credits ANS wellhead value SB 21 SB 192 $140 - $150$1$.50 $130 - $140$2$1 $120 - $130$3 $1.50 $110 - $120 $4 $2 $100 - $110 $5 $2.50 $90 - $100$6 $3 $80 - $90$7 $3.50 Less than $80$8$4 SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 14

Government Take In 2012, Dr. Pedro van Meurs advised the legislature that a 70% – 75% government take for existing production in legacy fields is reasonable compared to similar jurisdictions Under SB 21, government take is too low in the legacy fields and unstable SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 15

Count the Cash SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 16

North Dakota State of North Dakota take is 11.5% on gross + private royalty owner take is ± 20% on gross = 31.5% gross tax rate What if Alaska had the same tax and royalty regime as North Dakota? SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 17

Alaska (SB 21) vs. North Dakota SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 18

Alaska (ACES) vs. North Dakota SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 19

Alaska is Different Alaska is Different Alaska is an owner state, the mineral rights are owned collectively by the people The oil belongs to every Alaskan and the production tax is nothing more than the selling price of our oil SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 20

Value of Legacy Fields Not necessary to reduce the tax in the legacy fields of Prudhoe and Kuparuk where production is already economic Net present value and internal rate of return surpass the industries hurdle rate and are extremely profitable There are approximately 7 billion barrels of proven reserves that are technically, economically and legally deliverable in the legacy fields* An approximate value of $800 billion at current oil prices The value of the remaining reservoir is higher than the cumulative value of all the North Slope oil produced to date *2011 State Superior Court ruling in BP Pipelines, et al. v. State et al. as upheld by 2014 State Supreme Court ruling SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 21

Make Alaska Competitive with North Dakota Repeal the going out of business sale SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by Senator Stedman 22