Extension Coexistence with OBSS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
Advertisements

LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
TGn Sync Atlanta Presentation on Confirmation
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
Legacy OFDM Transmission on several Antennas
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
JTC1 Chair’s Closing Report
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
JTC1 Ad Hoc Mid-week Report
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Protection Assurance Method
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Number of Encoder as a function of MCS
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D1.04-D1.0 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
Solution for 40MHz in 2.4 GHz band
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Coex Ad Hoc January London Agenda and Report
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc San Francisco, July 2007
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
PAPR in LTF’s in with and without rotation of the upper subcarrier
PAPR in LTF’s in with and without rotation of the upper subcarrier
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Extension Coexistence with OBSS Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/0857r0 June 2006 Extension Coexistence with OBSS Date: 2006-27-06 Authors: Name Company Address Phone email Assaf Kasher Intel assaf.kasher@intel.com Solomon Trainin Solomon.trainin@intel.com Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Assaf Kasher (Intel) Assaf Kasher (Intel)

CID numbers Partially addressing these comments: Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/0857r0 June 2006 CID numbers Partially addressing these comments: 1430, 2730, 49, 704 1750, 2723, 4640, 6813, 6938, 7178, 7319, 7767, 7839, 7893, 10016, 106, 291, 1517, 1503, 1559, 1625, 1635, 165, 3882, 4084, 4188, 4574, 6769, 7012, 7473, 7922, 10293, 10379, 1449 1425, 12111, 12245, 11730, 1405, 3513, 3414, 10018 Assaf Kasher (Intel) Assaf Kasher (Intel)

How does a 40MHz device respect transmission in the extension channel Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/0857r0 June 2006 How does a 40MHz device respect transmission in the extension channel It is impossible to respect the NAV in the extension channel We cannot receive in the extension channel while we are transmitting in the control channel. We need to set a mechanism that will enable reasonable coexistence between a 40MHz BSS and an overlapping BSS in the extension channel. Assaf Kasher (Intel) Assaf Kasher (Intel)

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/0857r0 June 2006 Proposal The PHY senses CCA on both the control and extension channel. (CCA on the extension channel is energy based) The 40MHz will fully respect NAV on the control channel. When the backoff counter of a 40MHz device expires, when there is no transmission in the control channel (CCA(idle)), it will check CCA in the extension channel. If there is a CCA(busy) signal in extension channel, it shall not transmit a 40MHz transmission. At this point: It may choose to transmit in 20MHz. If it chooses to transmit in 40MHz, it must wait for CCA to go to idle in the extension channel, and then restart the backoff counter in the control channel. Assaf Kasher (Intel) Assaf Kasher (Intel)