Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – JAMMU & KASHMIR on 14.07.2010 Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – JAMMU & KASHMIR on 14.07.2010 1 1

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Part-I Review of Implementation of MDMS in JAMMU & KASHMIR (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No. of Schools Covered (PY & UP.PY) Ref: Table 2, 2.1, 2.2, Fact Sheet Total Coverage 100% 3 3

PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3) Ref: Table 1.2, Fact Sheet No. of Working days 100% 89% 64% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3) Ref: Table 1.1, Fact Sheet 91% Covered 87% 85% 117% Covered 94% 5

Children Non Coverage District Wise (Primary) S No District No. of children as per PAB Approval for 2009-10 Average no of children availed MDM[APR-DEC]* Difference Deficit % Non Coverage 1 Ramban 33957 19161 -14796 -44% 2 Poonch 57476 36253 -21223 -37% 3 Reasi 41400 26299 -15101 -36% 4 Rajouri 69685 45452 -24233 -35% 5 Kathua 40064 27702 -12362 -31% 6 Udhampur 46745 32968 -13777 -29% 7 Jammu 49268 37204 -12064 -24% 8 Samba 10808 8172 -2636 9 Budgam 62591 48478 -14113 -23%

Children Non Coverage District Wise (Upper Primary) S No District No. of children as per PAB Approval for 2009-10 Average no of children availed MDM[APR-DEC]* Difference Deficit % Non Coverage 1 Ramban 11912 7919 -3993 -34% 2 Poonch 22364 15182 -7182 -32% 3 Rajouri 25926 18456 -7470 -29% 4 Bandipora 12884 10460 -2424 -19% 5 Jammu 27270 22743 -4527 -17% 6 Samba 6915 5788 -1127 -16% 7 Ganderbal 10519 9198 -1321 -13%

PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3) Ref: Table 3.3 & 3.4, Fact Sheet Total Meals served 57% No. of Meal (in Crore) 100% 89% 54% 100% 89% 61% PRIMARY UPPER PRIMARY 8

Food Grains Utilisation(1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Ref: Table 4, Fact Sheet 89% benchmark 57% Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 9

Food grains lifting [APR-DEC] [CONSOLIDATED FCI BIILS] Ref: Table 4.4, Fact Sheet Foodgrains (in MTs) Including Unspent balance 10 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

MISMATCH IN FOODGRAIN LIFTING [APR-DEC] Ref: Table 4.4, Fact Sheet 25% DIFFERENCE Foodgrains (in MTs) AS PER AWP&B 2010-11 SUBMITTED BY THE STATE ON THE BASIS OF FCI BIILS RECEIVED & PAID 11 11 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Ref: Table 5, Fact Sheet 89% benchmark 35% 100% 12 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Mismatch of no of meals served, Cooking Cost utilised & Foodgrains utilised (Q1+Q2+Q3) 13 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India MME Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Ref: Table 6, Fact Sheet * 100% * Authorised by Finance Department in the month of FEB-2010 & expenditure incurred in the month of March-2010. 14 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Ref: Table 7, Fact Sheet 100% 2% 15 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Sheds) Ref: Table 8.3, Fact Sheet 82% utilisation of Physical 82% utilisation of Financial 16 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Devices) Ref: Table 8.6, Fact Sheet 99% utilisation of Physical 99% utilisation of Financial 17 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance Score card 2009-2010 Sl Component Performance Benchmark 1. No of Schools covered under MDM 100% 2. No of Children (PY+ UP.PY) 87% 3. No of Working Days 64% 89% 5. Foodgrains Utilisation 57% 6. Cooking Cost Utilisation 35% 7. Meals Served 8. MME Utilisation 0% 75% 9. Transport Assistance Utilisation 2% 10. Kitchen Shed construction 82% 11. Kitchen Devices procurement 99% 12. QPRs 4 nos.

Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-11 19 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Time Series No of Children (PRIMARY) Ref: Table 9, Fact Sheet 96% 88% 85% 20 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No of Children (PRIMARY) Ref: Table 9, Fact Sheet PAB Approval 09-10 DISE 08-09 DISE 09-10 PROPOSAL 2010-11 AVAILED MDM OPTED MDM 21 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Time Series No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY) Ref: Table 10, Fact Sheet 103% 112% 92% 22 22 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY) Ref: Table 10, Fact Sheet PAB Approval 09-10 DISE 08-09 DISE 09-10 STATE PROPOSAL 2010-11 OPTED MDM AVAILED MDM 23 23 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No. of School days No Source of Data No of Days 1 DISE 2008-09 213 2 Ref: Table 10, Fact Sheet No Source of Data No of Days 1 DISE 2008-09 213 2 MDM approval (09-10) 220 3 Benchmark(Q1+Q2+Q3) 196 4 Performance(Q1+Q2+Q3) 142 5 State Proposal 223 24

Proposal for Kitchen Cum Stores No Item No. 1 Total No. of Institutions 21504 2 Total Sanctioned (06-10) 5815 3 Constructed through convergence 3850 4 Gap 11839 5 State Proposal ( 2010-11) 6712 25 25

Proposal for Kitchen Devices No Item No. 1 Total No. of Institutions 21504 2 Total Sanctioned (06-10) 19665 3 Convergence NIL 4 Gap 1839 5 State Proposal ( 2010-11 ) 26 26

No. of Cook-cum-helpers Item No. 1 No. of Institutions 21504 2 Already Sanctioned (Dec 09- March 10) 11113 3 Already Working (09-10) 4 Additional requirement 9068 5 Total requirement(3+4) 30572 27 27

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Thank You 28 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India