Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (September 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Advertisements

The Ras-Erk-ETS-Signaling Pathway Is a Drug Target for Longevity
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Negative Regulation by Amidase PGRPs Shapes the Drosophila Antibacterial Response and Protects the Fly from Innocuous Infection  Juan C. Paredes, David P.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Jeonghyun Ahn, Sehee Son, Sergio C. Oliveira, Glen N. Barber 
translin Is Required for Metabolic Regulation of Sleep
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Age-Related Changes in Insulin-like Signaling Lead to Intermediate-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila  Kento Tanabe, Motoyuki Itoh, Ayako Tonoki  Cell.
Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling Mediates Resistance to Mycobacteria by Inhibiting Bacterial Growth and Macrophage Death  Hilary Clay, Hannah E. Volkman,
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (January 2018)
Intestinal Stem Cell Pool Regulation in Drosophila
A Leptin Analog Locally Produced in the Brain Acts via a Conserved Neural Circuit to Modulate Obesity-Linked Behaviors in Drosophila  Jennifer Beshel,
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e10 (February 2019)
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages e4 (June 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Glucocorticoid Receptor Binding Induces Rapid and Prolonged Large-Scale Chromatin Decompaction at Multiple Target Loci  Alasdair W. Jubb, Shelagh Boyle,
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (February 2015)
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling Mediates Resistance to Mycobacteria by Inhibiting Bacterial Growth and Macrophage Death  Hilary Clay, Hannah E. Volkman,
Samuel James Walker, Verónica María Corrales-Carvajal, Carlos Ribeiro 
Kanyan Xu, Xiangzhong Zheng, Amita Sehgal  Cell Metabolism 
Nitric Oxide Contributes to Behavioral, Cellular, and Developmental Responses to Low Oxygen in Drosophila  James A. Wingrove, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Cell 
Chunli Ren, Paul Webster, Steven E. Finkel, John Tower  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Age-Related Changes in Insulin-like Signaling Lead to Intermediate-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila  Kento Tanabe, Motoyuki Itoh, Ayako Tonoki  Cell.
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Sean M. Kearney, Sean M. Gibbons, Susan E. Erdman, Eric J. Alm 
Zeenna A. Stapper, Thomas R. Jahn  Cell Reports 
Arvind Kumar Shukla, Joshua Spurrier, Irina Kuzina, Edward Giniger 
Jeonghyun Ahn, Sehee Son, Sergio C. Oliveira, Glen N. Barber 
Negative Regulation by Amidase PGRPs Shapes the Drosophila Antibacterial Response and Protects the Fly from Innocuous Infection  Juan C. Paredes, David P.
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Erin S. Keebaugh, Ryuichi Yamada, Benjamin Obadia, William B
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
SUPT4H1 Depletion Leads to a Global Reduction in RNA
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 1656-1667 (September 2015) Distinct Shifts in Microbiota Composition during Drosophila Aging Impair Intestinal Function and Drive Mortality  Rebecca I. Clark, Anna Salazar, Ryuichi Yamada, Sorel Fitz-Gibbon, Marco Morselli, Jeanette Alcaraz, Anil Rana, Michael Rera, Matteo Pellegrini, William W. Ja, David W. Walker  Cell Reports  Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 1656-1667 (September 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Alterations in Microbiota Composition Are Linked to Age-Onset Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction (A and B) Bacterial levels assayed by qPCR of the16S rRNA gene in dissected intestines from Smurfs (BD+) and non-Smurf controls (BD−) at 10-day intervals to day 40 (A) and during a time course following barrier dysfunction at day 30 (B). n = 6 replicates of five dissected intestines. Numbers in red indicate fold change of the median compared to the relevant BD− control. (C) Representative images of bacteria visualized by TO-PRO-3 DNA stain in the posterior midgut lumen of BD− or 5-day post-BD+ (red channel, TO-PRO-3 DNA stain; scale bar represents 10 μm). (D) Time series data of 16S qPCR in fecal samples of individual 40- to 50-day-old flies, grouped as BD− or pre-BD+ depending on their phenotype during the first 24 hr of the final 48 hr sampling window. n = 12–14 individuals. Numbers in red indicate fold change of the median compared to the −6 pre-BD time point. (E) Normalized number of sequence assignments at the class taxonomic level in 8- and 96-hr post-BD+ and BD−. Only the most-abundant groups are shown. n = 3 replicates of five dissected intestines at day 30. Numbers in red indicate fold change of the median compared to the relevant BD− control. (F) Proportional sequence assignments for BD−, 8- and 96-hr post-BD+. Each column represents a biological replicate. Horizontal black lines separate the taxonomic units, major groups are color coded, and the legend shows color assignments and taxonomic hierarchy. n = 3 replicates of five dissected intestines from day 30. All are in w1118 females. BD−, non-Smurf; BD+, post-Smurf. Boxplots display the first and third quartile, with the horizontal bar at the median and whiskers showing the most extreme data point, which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Wilcoxon test was used for (A), (B), and (D); t test was used for (E). Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Age-Related Dysbiosis Impacts Intestinal Physiology (A) Bacterial levels assayed by taxon-specific qPCR of the 16S rRNA gene in non-Smurfs at 10, 20, and 45 days of age. n = 6 replicates of five dissected intestines. (B) Bacterial levels assayed by qPCR of 16S with universal primers in antibiotic-treated and untreated non-Smurfs at 10, 20, 30, and 40 days of age. n = 6 replicates of five dissected intestines. (C–H) Representative images (C) and analysis (D–H) of fecal output over a 48-hr period from untreated (AB−) and antibiotic-treated (AB+) non-Smurfs at 20 and 40 days of age. Shown are mean number (D), mean area (E), mean circularity (F), mean lightness (G), and mean hue (H) of deposits. Arrows indicate a representative fecal deposit. n = 10 replicate groups of ten flies. (I) Food consumption as measured by the CAFE assay in untreated (AB−) and antibiotic-treated (AB+) non-Smurfs at 20 and 40 days of age. n = 10 replicate groups of ten flies. All are in w1118 females. Antibiotic treatment (AB−/+) was from 10 days of age. Boxplots display the first and third quartile, with the horizontal bar at the median and whiskers showing the most extreme data point, which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; Wilcoxon test. Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Intestinal Immune Activation Shortens Life and Induces Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction (A–C) Antimicrobial peptide gene expression assayed at 10-day intervals by qPCR from dissected intestines of untreated (AB−) or antibiotic-treated (AB+) w1118 female non-Smurfs. Antibiotic feeding was from 10 days of age. n = 6 replicates of five intestines. Dpt, Diptericin (A); Dro, Drosocin (B); Mtk, Metchnikowin (C). (D–G) Lifespan curves (D and F) and Smurf proportions (E and G) in UAS-Toll10b/5966-Geneswitch (D and E) and UAS-PGRP-LC/5966-Geneswitch (F and G) female flies drug induced from day 10 of adulthood (RU50) and uninduced controls (RU0). n = >200 flies/condition. BD−, non-Smurf; BD+, Smurf. Boxplots display the first and third quartile, with the horizontal bar at the median and whiskers showing the most extreme data point, which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Log rank test for survival data was used in (D) and (F), binomial test for Smurf proportions was used in (E) and (G), Wilcoxon test was used for other data. Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Early-Life Microbiota Modulates Lifespan and Age-Onset Intestinal Barrier Function (A and B) Lifespan curve (A) and Smurf proportions (B) of w1118 female flies conventionally reared, axenically reared, and axenically treated and exposed to fly homogenate as embryos. n = >250 flies/condition. A, axenic; C, conventional; F, homogenate fed. p values are compared to conventionally reared. (C–G) w1118 females fed, at the 10-day time point, homogenate from 10-day-old or 30-day-old flies. (C–E) Bacterial levels assayed by 16S qPCR at multiple time points with universal primers (C), at 12 days of age with Alphaproteobacteria primers (D), and at 33 days of age with Bacilli primers (E). n = 6 replicates of five surface-sterilized whole flies. Numbers in bold above each box give the fold change in the median relative to the relevant control. (F and G) Lifespan curve (F) and Smurf proportions (G) are shown. n = >200 flies/condition. (H and I) Lifespan curve (H) and Smurf proportions (I) of antibiotic-treated and untreated w1118 female flies. n = >200 flies/condition. (J and K) Lifespan curve (J) and Smurf proportions (K) of antibiotic-treated Canton S female flies and untreated controls. Antibiotic feeding was from 10 days of age. Boxplots display the first and third quartile, with the horizontal bar at the median and whiskers showing the most extreme data point, which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Log rank test for survival data was used in (A), (F), (H), and (J). Binomial test for Smurf proportions was used in (B), (G), (I), and (K). Wilcoxon test was used for other data. Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Age-Onset Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Is Progressive and Associated with Altered Levels of Cell Junction Components (A) Images of Smurf flies, representing the color classes defined to reflect different amounts of blue dye in the hemolymph. (B) The proportion of Smurf flies in each color class following 24 hr on the blue food, at 24 hr, 72 hr, and 5 days post-Smurf. n = >100 flies/time point. p values are given relative to the previous time point. The relevant groups are given for each p value; AG, all groups. (C) Junction protein gene expression assayed by qPCR from dissected intestines of non-Smurfs (BD−) and 72-hr post-Smurf (BD+). n = 6 replicates of five intestines. DECad, Drosophila E-Cadherin; Dl, Delta; dlg1, discs large 1; kune, kune-kune; N, Notch; pck, pickle; pyd, polychaetoid; sinu; sinuous. (D and E) Representative images (D) and quantification (E) of anti-dlg staining from the posterior midgut of BD− and 5-day post-BD+ (red channel, TO-PRO-3 DNA stain; green channel, anti-dlg; scale bar represents 10 μm). n > 20 confocal stacks from posterior midgut/condition; one fly per replicate stack. (F) Smurf proportions in antibiotic-treated and untreated 5-day post-Smurf flies. n = >100 flies/condition. All are in 30- to 35-day-old w1118 female flies. Antibiotic treatment was from 24-hr post-Smurf. BD−, non-Smurf; BD+, Smurf. Boxplots display the first and third quartile, with the horizontal bar at the median and whiskers showing the most extreme data point, which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; binomial test for Smurf proportions; Wilcoxon test for other data. Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Preventing Dysbiosis Post-intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Restores Lifespan (A and B) Gene expression assayed by qPCR from dissected intestines of non-Smurfs (BD−) and at multiple time points post-Smurf (BD+). n = 6 replicates of five intestines. (C–F) Gene expression assayed by qPCR from whole BD− and 8, 48, and 120 hr post-BD+ flies. n = 6 replicates of three whole flies. (G and H) Antimicrobial peptide gene expression assayed by qPCR from dissected intestines (G) or whole fly (H) of antibiotic-treated and untreated 5-day post-BD+ flies. n = 6 replicates of five intestines or three whole flies. (I) Survival curves of antibiotic-treated and untreated 24-hr post-BD+ flies and age-matched untreated BD− controls. n = >200 flies/condition. p values are compared to BD− controls. Dpt, Diptericin; Dro, Drosocin; Drs, Drosomycin; Duox, Dual Oxidase; Mtk, Metchnikowin; Socs36E, Suppressor of cytokine signaling at 36E; upd3, unpaired 3. All flies were scored BD− or BD+ between 30 and 35 days old. All are in w1118 female flies. Antibiotic treatment from 24 hr post-BD+. Boxplots display the first and third quartile, with the horizontal bar at the median and whiskers showing the most extreme data point, which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; log rank test for survival data in (I); Wilcoxon test for other data. Cell Reports 2015 12, 1656-1667DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions