New Grant Program: Title IV, Part A, what is it?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
ESSA Impact on Health & Physical Education. Inclusion in ESSA Well-rounded education definition – along with 17 other subjects…. – Title I – Title II.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
UNPACKING ESSA PRESENTATION TO THE WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF EDUCATIONAL GRANTS MANAGERS MAY 17, 2016.
Title IV-A of ESSA Student Support & Academic Enrichment Grant PRESENTED BY TIM THORNBURGH May 5,
Title IV, Part A Student Support and Academic Enrichment (SSAE) Grants
Student Support and Academic Enrichment (SSAE) Grants
Parent and Family Engagement: NCLB/ESSA Side-by-Side
Division of Student Support Services
ESSA and the Changing Education Landscape
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
English Learners Coordinators Meeting September 12, 2016
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
WVDE Office of Federal Programs
AGENDA Purpose of the ESSA Key Provisions Impacting Perkins
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Title IV Part A Student Support and Academic Enrichment (SSAE)
Illinois State Board of Education Public Nonpublic Conference
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Superintendents.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
TIIA and IVA in the FY19 ESSA Consolidated Grant Application
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Teacher Prep.
Beth Joseph Angela Landry
ESSA Title Programs Spoke: Decision Points
School Boards.
Teachers.
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
ESSA Accountability Parent and Family Engagement
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Title Plans and Assurances Spoke Committee Presentation
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Principals.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Title IV Part A Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grant
FASFEPA/ECTAC Spring Pre-Forum May 14, 2019
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
ESSA Requirements for Equitable Participation of Private Schools
Presentation transcript:

New Grant Program: Title IV, Part A, what is it? Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grant NOVEMBER 2016

Purpose Newly authorized under subpart 1 of Title IV, Part A of the ESEA, the Student Support and Academic Enrichment (SSAE) program is intended to increase the capacity of State educational agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies (LEAs), schools, and local communities to: provide all students with access to a well-rounded education; improve school conditions for student learning; and Improve the use of technology in order to improve the academic achievement and digital literacy of all students 2

Allowable Activities Activities to support well rounded educational opportunities for students may include:  STEM programs Music and art programs Foreign language offerings The opportunity to earn credits from institutions of higher learning Reimbursing low-income students to cover the costs of accelerated learning examination fees Environmental education Programs and activities that promote volunteerism and community involvement *This is not an exhaustive list. 3

Well-Rounded Education A well-rounded education starts with early learning opportunities that make time for exploration and continues with K-12 education that helps students make important connections among their studies, their curiosities, their passions, and the skills they need to become critical thinkers and productive members of society. A well-rounded education promotes a diverse set of learning experiences that engages students across a variety of courses, activities, and programs in subjects such as English, reading/language arts, writing, science, technology, engineering, mathematics, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, geography, computer science, music, career and technical education, health, and physical education. Discussion question: Do you agree with the above definition? Why or why not? What would you add or change? 4

Allowable Activities Activities to support safe and healthy students may include:  School-based mental health services Drug and violence prevention activities that are evidence-based Integrating health and safety practices into school or athletic programs Nutritional education and physical education activities Bullying and harassment prevention Activities that improve instructional practices for developing relationship-building skills Prevention of teen and dating violence, stalking, domestic abuse, and sexual violence and harassment Establishing or improving school dropout and reentry programs Training school personnel in effective practices related to the above *This is not an exhaustive list. 5

Allowable Activities Activities to improve the use of educational technology in order to improve the academic achievement and digital literacy of all students may include: Providing educators, school leaders, and administrators with the professional learning tools, devices, content and resources to: Personalize learning Discover, adapt, and share relevant high-quality educational resources Use technology effectively in the classroom Implement and support school and districtwide approaches for using technology to inform instruction, support teacher collaboration, and personalize learning *This is not an exhaustive list. 6

Allowable Activities Activities to improve the use of educational technology in order to improve the academic achievement and digital literacy of all students may include: Building technological capacity and infrastructure Developing or using effective or innovative strategies for the delivery of specialized or rigorous academic courses through the use of technology Carrying out blended learning activities (must include ongoing professional development for teachers) Providing professional development on the use of technology to enable teachers to increase student achievement in STEM areas Providing students in rural, remote, and underserved areas with the resources to take advantage of high-quality digital learning experiences 7

Funding The law authorizes $1.65 billion For reference: The authorized amount for Title I is ~$15 billion U.S. Senate Labor, Health and Human Services, Education Appropriations Subcommittee appropriated only $300 million in its recently approved funding bill. Activities must supplement, and not supplant, non-federal funds that would otherwise be available for activities authorized under Title IV, Part A. 8

Funding Opportunities to leverage funds Title I funds may be used to promote supportive school climates. 21st Century Community Learning Centers also provide opportunities through programs such as nutrition and health education, drug and violence prevention, and arts education. Title II funds may be used to provide training for school personnel to address issues related to school conditions for student learning. Title V, Part B funds (Rural and Low-Income School Program) may be used for any activities allowable under other programs in ESSA. LEAs may form consortiums to maximize the impact of Title IV, Part A funds. 9

Program Requirements Activities must be planned in consultation with parents, teachers, principals, and other relevant stakeholders. Must also engage in continued consultation to improve the activities. LEAs receiving at least $30,000 must conduct a comprehensive needs assessment every 3 years use at least 20% of the funds to support activities related to well-rounded educational opportunities use at least 20% of the funds to support safe and healthy students use a portion of the funds to support the improvement of the use of educational technology prioritize the funds toward high-need schools in the district LEAs may use a portion of the funds for activities conducted in partnership with an IHE, business, nonprofit organization, or community-based organization. 10

Stakeholder Consultation What stakeholders other than teachers, parents, and principals should be consulted when planning activities? Required in statute (where applicable) Encouraged in non-regulatory guidance Paraprofessionals Students Community-based organizations Local government representatives (may include law enforcement and child welfare) Indian tribes or tribal organizations Charter school teachers and principals Business community Health providers Police and social workers Librarians Technology experts Service providers Faith-based community leaders 11

Distribution of Funds Must an LEA distribute Title IV, Part A funds to all of its schools? No. The LEA has discretion in how the funds are distributed to schools, with the exception of the requirement to prioritize toward high-need schools if the allocation is $30,000 or more. Do the minimum % of funds to be used in each content area apply to schools to which the LEA distributes funds? No. This requirement only applies to the LEA as a whole. In the case of a consortium, do the minimum % of funds to be used in each content area apply to the consortium or each LEA? The consortium 12

Implementing Effective Programs Identifying local needs Select relevant, evidence-based activities Plan for implementation Implement activities Examine and reflect 13

Identifying Local Needs Questions to consider: Which stakeholders can help identify local needs and/or root causes? How can they be engaged early and in a meaningful way throughout the process? What data are needed? Are there inequities inherent in our system that are driving some of these needs? How should identified needs be prioritized? 14

Selecting Relevant, Evidence-Based Activities While ESEA requires “at least one study” on an intervention to provide strong evidence, moderate evidence, or promising evidence, SEAs, LEAs, and other stakeholders should consider the entire body of relevant evidence. The What Works ClearinghouseTM (WWC) uses rigorous standards to review evidence of effectiveness on a wide range of interventions and also summarizes the settings and populations in the studies. Interventions with little to no evidence should at least demonstrate a rationale for how they will achieve their intended goals. Local capacity also helps predict the success of an intervention, so the available funding, staff resources, staff skills, and support for interventions should be considered when selecting an evidence-based intervention. 15

Discussion Question How does your district, school, and/or team identify evidence-based activities and interventions? 16

Implementing Activities Consider including in your implementation plan: A logic model Well defined, measurable goals with implementation timelines Clearly outlined roles and responsibilities Identified resources required A process to monitor implementation An outreach strategy to regularly engage stakeholders 17

Examine and Reflect Questions to consider: What are reasonable expectations of success at the beginning, middle an end of an activity or intervention and how should it be measured? Is performance data sufficient or is there a need for a rigorous evaluation? If so, are the resources to support such an evaluation? What interim progress milestones should be collected? What does the information collected suggest about ways to improve the activity? 18

Special Rule Regarding AP Exams Under the special rule in section 4107(b) of the ESEA, an LEA may use FY 17 funds to cover part or all of the fees for AP, IB, or other accelerated learning examinations taken by low-income students in both the 2016-2017 school year and 2017-2018 school year. Consistent with section 4104(b)(3)(A)(ii), a State may also use funds not reserved for LEA subgrants or State administrative costs to reimburse the costs of accelerated learning examinations for low-income students. Under the special rule in section 4104(c), a State may similarly use funds to pay for accelerated learning examinations taken by low-income students in the 2016-2017 school year. 19

Resources Resources and tools for the three subject areas are available from USDE at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/essassaegrantguid10212016.pdf CDE’s page for all ESSA related items and updates: http://www.cde.state.co.us/fedprograms/essa Contact information: Jennifer Simons simons_j@cde.state.co.us 303.866.3905 20