Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DiseaseNo disease 60 people with disease 40 people without disease Total population = 100.
Advertisements

Improved Reflexive Testing Algorithm for Hepatitis C Infection Using Signal-to-Cutoff Ratios of a Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Assay K.K.Y. Lai, M. Jin,
What Happens to the Performance of a Diagnostic Test when the Disease Prevalence and the Cut-Point Change? Pathological scores Healthy scores Healthy population.
STUDY DESIGN FOR DIAGNOSTIC STUDY FOR MELIOIDOSIS Dr Direk Limmathurotsakul, MD MSc PhD.
Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
Statistical Fridays J C Horrow, MD, MSSTAT
Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests. Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual.
(Medical) Diagnostic Testing. The situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or.
Basic statistics 11/09/13.
Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy. Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive.
Sensitivity Sensitivity answers the following question: If a person has a disease, how often will the test be positive (true positive rate)? i.e.: if the.
BIOE 301 Lecture Thirteen. Review of Lecture 12 The burden of cancer Contrasts between developed/developing world How does cancer develop? Cell transformation.
Sensitivity & Specificity Sam Thomson 8/12/10. Sensitivity Proportion of people with the condition who have a positive test result Proportion of people.
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Pattern Classification an Diagnostic Decision Yongnan Ji.
Supplementary Fig. 1. Statistical Classification Analysis Results. Box and whisker plots displaying mean performance metrics returned in the assessment.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics Professor Mobeen Iqbal Shifa College of Medicine.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
ROC curve estimation. Index Introduction to ROC ROC curve Area under ROC curve Visualization using ROC curve.
Timothy Wiemken, PhD MPH Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Tests.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Is suicide predictable? Paul St John-Smith Short Courses in Psychiatry 15/10/2008.
Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity analysis
Screening for Disease: Part One
METHOD RESULTS CONCLUSION
Two Way Tables & Data Collection.
Lecture 3.
Algebra 150 Unit: Functions Lesson Plan #11: Practice Using TI-83 Calculator to Calculate Values with Linear Functions Tables Objective SWBT use a TI-83.
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL METHOD TO DETERMINE UTILITY OF A DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Dr. Tauseef Ismail Assistant Professor Dept of C Med. KGMC
Measuring Success in Prediction
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
D th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy October 25-28, Washington, DC Evaluation of a Rapid PBP2’ Agglutination.
ارزیابی تست های تشخیصی ارائه: سید عماد احمدی.
کاربرد آمار در آزمایشگاه
How do we judge efficacy of a screening test?
Evaluation of the Guidelines for Management of Pancreatic Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm  Raymond S. Tang, Benjamin Weinberg, David.
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity analysis
Hint: Numerator Denominator. Vascular Technology Lecture 34: Test Validation (Statistical Profile and Correlation) HHHoldorf.
Figures & Tables from the textbook.
Is a Positive Developmental-Behavioral Screening Score Sufficient to Justify Referral? A Review of Evidence and Theory  R. Christopher Sheldrick, PhD,
دكتر محسن ميرزائي MD , MPH
Millie D. Long, Bruce E. Sands 
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Large-scale testing of women in Copenhagen has not reduced the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections  H. Westh, H.J. Kolmos  Clinical Microbiology.
More on Limits.
Patricia Butterfield & Naomi Chaytor October 18th, 2017
Accuracy of administrative data versus clinical data to evaluate carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting  Rodney P. Bensley, MD, Shunsuke Yoshida,
Diagnostics outside the laboratory
Positive predictive value of screening tests
Julie Parkes, Indra Neil Guha, Paul Roderick, William Rosenberg 
Figure 11-1.
Basics of ML Rohan Suri.
© Scott Harris University of Southampton
Figure Overview.
Figure Overview.
Sensivity Sensivity Sensivity 100-specify 100-specify 100-specify
BETONLINEBETONLINE A·+A·+
Charles J. Diskin, MD, Thomas J. Stokes, MD, Linda M
Accuracy of RDT-based diagnosis of malaria in patients in rural and urban areas in the Ashanti Region of Ghana By Mutala Abdul-Hakim (MPhil Microbiology.
Diagnostic performance of dentist clinical impression.
Personalized, 16-plex assays accurately detect ctDNA ahead of clinical relapse. Personalized, 16-plex assays accurately detect ctDNA ahead of clinical.
Clinical Effectiveness: sensitivity, specificity and PPV
Information Organization: Evaluation of Classification Performance
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test. True Classification Diagnostic Test Disease present (+) Disease absent (-) Disease present(+) a = True positive b = False positive Disease absent(-) c = False negative d = True negative a + c b + d

Figure 2. Method for calculating sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test. Term Definition Calculation Sensitivity = % of patients with the disease who test positive = a/(a + c) x 100 Specificity = % of patents who do NOT have disease who test negative = d/(b + d) x 100

% of patients with a positive test who have the disease = Figure 3. Method for calculating positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of a diagnostic test. Term Definition Calculation PPV = % of patients with a positive test who have the disease = a/(a + b) x 100 NPV = % of patents with a negative test who do NOT have the disease = d/(c + d) x 100