Defining the Company’s Mission and Social Responsibility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1 Session 3 Defining the Company’s Mission and Social Responsibility.
Defining the Firm’s Mission and Social Responsibility.
Company Mission Chapter 2
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Stakeholders, the Mission, Governance, and Business Ethics Chapter 2 Essentials of Strategic Management,
Chapter 3 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Part Two: STRATEGY FORMULATION and IMPLEMENTATION
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Strategy. Planning - strategic - emergent - contingency plans Objectives: LT, ST.
Stakeholders and Ethics Organizational Stakeholders Stakeholders: people who have an interest, claim, or stake in an organization  Inside stakeholders.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Defining the Business: Vision, Mission and Long-term Objectives
Chapter 5 Managing Responsibly and Ethically Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc. 5-1.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 The Role and Environment of Managerial Finance.
Quality and Productivity Management Deming, TQM, and 6 Sigma.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Strategic Management, 10/e Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Corporate Social Responsibility and.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Strategic Management, 10/e Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Corporate Social Responsibility and.
Pearce & Robinson, 10th ed..
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 2 Defining the Company’s Mission and Social Responsibility.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Strategic Management, 10/e Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Corporate Social Responsibility and.
Policy Management and Strategy Dr. Daniel K. Dayton.
Chapter 2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Approaches to CSR. Inspiring Long-term Driven by and evokes passion Broad; Overarching; Brief Fundamental statement of the organization’s Values Aspiration.
Chapter 1 Market-Oriented Perspectives Underlie Successful Corporate, Business, and Marketing Strategies.
Supervisory Management
M.Phil. (TU) 01/2010), Ph.D. Scholar
CIMA E1: Organisational Management Study session 2
MGMT 452 Corporate Social Responsibility
Preventing Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation
Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility Module Eight | Lesson One 1.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.MGT437
MODELOS DE GESTIÓN DE CALIDAD
CHAPTER 3: STRATEGIC PLANNING.
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Chapter 1 The Role of Financial Management
Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Robert E. Hoskisson
Chapter 3 Performance Management and Strategic Planning
STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
Chapter 2 Company Mission McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Session 2 Part 1 (Chapter 2)
Chapter 1 Principles of Finance
Defining the Company’s Mission
The Business Vision and Mission
Who Controls Our Business?
Defining the Company’s Mission
Defining the Company’s Mission
Corporate Governance It is a system by which companies are managed and directed in the best interests of the owners and shareholders. It refers to the.
Learning Objectives Identify stakeholders’ roles in business ethics
Defining the Company’s Mission
Defining the Company’s Mission
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
©2003 South-Western Publishing Company
Chapter 1 Strategic Management McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Defining the Company’s Mission
CHAPTER 10 Corporate Governance
Quality Management MNGT 420
Defining the Company’s Mission
The Business Vision and Mission
The Business Vision and Mission
Strategy Analysis and organization design
Teams in Quality Organizations
Company Mission Chapter 2 Discussant: JAQUELYN G. MONTALES.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Presentation transcript:

Defining the Company’s Mission and Social Responsibility Chapter 2 Defining the Company’s Mission and Social Responsibility

Chapter Topics What is a Company Mission? Formulating a Mission Overseeing the Boards of Directors Agency Theory The Stakeholder Approach to Social Responsibility Management Ethics

What is a Company Mission? The fundamental purpose that sets a firm apart from other firms of its type and identifies the scope of its operations in product and market terms

Characteristics of a Mission Statement Embodies the business philosophy of the firm’s strategic decision makers Implies image firm seeks to project Reflects firm’s self-concept Indicates firm’s principal product or service areas primary customer needs the firm will attempt to satisfy

Questions Addressed By a Mission Statement Why is this firm in business? What are our economic goals? What is our operating philosophy in terms of quality, company image, and self-concept? What are our core competencies and competitive advantages? What customers do and can we serve? How do we view our responsibilities to stockholders, employees, communities, environment, social issues, and competitors?

Components of a Mission Statement Specifies basic type of product or service to be offered Identifies primary market or customer groups to be served Specifies the technology to be used in production or delivery Reflects the firm’s fundamental concern for survival through growth and profitability Reflects the firm’s managerial philosophy Identifies the public image the firm seeks Specifies the self-concept those affiliated with the firm should have of it

Ex 2-2: Practical Examples of Mission Statement Components Customer-market To anticipate and meet market needs of farmers, ranchers, and rural communities within North America (CENEX) Product-service AMAX’s principal products are molybdenum, coal, iron ore, copper, lead, zinc, petroleum and natural gas,. potash phosphates, nickel, tungsten, silver, gold, and magnesium

Ex 2-2 (contd.) Geographic domain We are dedicated to total success of Corning Glass Works as a worldwide competitor Technology The common technology in these areas relates to discrete particle coatings (NASHUA) Concern for Survival In this respect, the company will conduct its operations prudently, and will provide the profits and growth which will assure Hoover’s ultimate success (Hoover Universal)

Ex 2-2 (contd.) Philosophy We are committed to improve health care throughout the world (Baxter Travenol) Self-concept Hoover Universal is a diversified, multi-industry corporation with strong manufacturing capabilities, entrepreneurial policies, and individual business unit autonomy Concern for Public Image We are responsible to the communities in which we live and work and to the world community as well (Johnson & Johnson)

Newest Trends in Mission Components Sensitivity to customer wants “The customer is our top priority!” Emphasis on extensive product safety programs Concern for quality “Quality is job one!” Emphasis on quality in manufacturing New philosophy – quality is the norm

Newest Trends in Mission Components Statements of company vision Developed to express the aspirations of the executive leadership Presents the firm’s strategic intent “A computer on every desk, and in every home, running on Microsoft software”

Deming’s 14 Steps to Quality Create constancy of purpose Adopt the new philosophy Cease dependence on mass inspection to achieve quality End the practice of awarding business on price tag alone Improve constantly the system of production and service Institute training on the job Institute leadership Drive out fear Break down barriers between departments Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and numerical targets Eliminate quotas and management by objectives Remove barriers that rob workers, etc. of their right to pride of workmanship Institute a vigorous program of education/self-improvement Everyone works to accomplish goals

Responsibilities of the Board of Directors To establish and update the company mission To elect the company’s top officers, the foremost of whom is the CEO To establish the compensation levels of the top officers, including their salaries and bonuses To determine the amount and timing of the dividends paid to stockholders

Responsibilities of the Board of Directors To set broad company policy on such matters as labor-management relations, product or service lines of business, and employee benefit packages To set company objectives and to authorize managers to implement the long-term strategies that the top officers and the board have found agreeable To mandate company compliance with legal and ethical dictates

Ex. 2-10: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Major Elements) Corporate responsibility Increased disclosure Audit committees New crimes and increased criminal penalties New civil cause of action and increased enforcement powers Auditor independence

Concepts of Agency Theory Involves separation of owners (principals) and managers (agents) of a firm Potential exists for owners’ wishes to be ignored Involves delegation of decision-making authority by owners to managers Potential agency costs can include Agency problems Actions taken to minimize agency problems

How Can Agency Problems Occur? Moral hazard problem Owners have access to limited information Owners cannot monitor every executive decision Executives often free to pursue own interests Adverse selection Stockholders have limited ability to determine competencies of executives at time of hire Problems of overlapping priorities between owners and executives likely to occur

Potential Agency Relationship Problems Executives pursue growth in company size rather than in earnings Executives attempt to diversify their corporate risk Executives avoid risk Managers act to optimize their personal payoffs Executives act to protect their status

Solutions to the Agency Problem Define agent’s responsibilities in a contract, including elements like bonuses to align executives’ and owners’ interests Pay executives a premium for their services Structure a backloaded compensation plan for executives Create teams of executives across different organizational units to focus on overall organizational performance

Stakeholder Approach to Social Responsibility Incorporating stakeholders’ interests in the mission statement involves Identification of the stakeholders Understanding the stakeholders’ specific claims vis-à-vis the firm Reconciliation of these claims and assignment of priorities to them Coordination of the claims with other elements of the company mission

Ex. 2-12: Inputs to Development of Mission Statement Inside Stakeholders Outside Stakeholders Customers Suppliers Creditors Governments Unions Competitors General public Executive officers Board of directors Stockholders Employees Company Mission

Social Responsibility View of Outsiders Insiders’ claims need to be subordinated to the greater good of the society; that is, to the greater good of outsiders View of Insiders The competing claims of outsiders should be balanced against one another in a way that protects the company mission

Strategies to Address Social Responsibility Make it easy for consumer to be green Empower consumers with solutions The 4 E’s Enlist the support of the consumer Establish credibility with all publics

A Continuum of Social Responsibilities Economic responsibilities Legal responsibilities Ethical responsibilities Discretionary responsibilities

Why Should Managers Be Concerned About Social Responsibility? A company’s right to exist depends on its responsiveness to the external environment Government threatens increased regulation if businesses do not meet changing social standards A responsive corporate social policy may enhance a firm’s long-term viability

The Debate: Arguments Against CSR A business bears a responsibility only for the financial well-being of its stockholders Milton Friedman Corporate actions motivated by anything other than shareholder wealth maximization threatens that well-being.

The Debate: Arguments for CSR Business does not function in a vacuum Exists to serve Depends on its environment Has responsibility to ensure well-being of environment Stockholders’ interests may transcend the financial Best way for a company to maximize shareholder wealth Act in a socially responsible manner

Cost-Benefit Analysis of CSR Some CSR activities incur no dollar costs Analysis of CSR has not been successful because … Socially responsible behavior does not come at a prohibitive cost Socially responsible practices may create savings, thus increasing profits

Three broad trends are driving businesses to adopt CSR frameworks CSR Today Three broad trends are driving businesses to adopt CSR frameworks The resurgence of environmentalism Increasing buyer power Globalization of business

CSR’s Effect on the Mission Statement In developing mission statements, managers must identify all stakeholder groups and weigh their relative rights and abilities to affect the firm’s success Some companies are proactive in their approach to CSR, making it an integral part of their raison d’être (e.g., Ben and Jerry’s ice cream) Others are reactive, adopting socially responsible behavior only when they must (e.g., Exxon after the Valdez incident)

Social Audit A social audit attempts to measure a company’s actual social performance against the social objectives it has set for itself

Uses of a Social Audit Monitoring and evaluating firm social performance Scanning external environment Uses include … Determining firm vulnerabilities Institutionalizing CSR within firm

Management Ethics Ethics refers to the moral principles that govern the actions of an individual or a group. Values of one individual, group or society may be at odds with the values of another individual, group, or society. Ethical standards reflect not a universally accepted code, but rather the end product of a process of defining and clarifying the nature and content of human interaction.

Approaches to Questions of Ethics Managers who adopt the utilitarian approach judge the effects of a particular action on the people directly involved, in terms of what provides the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Managers who subscribe to the moral rights approach judge whether decisions and actions are in keeping with the maintenance of fundamental individual and group rights and privileges. Managers who take the social justice approach judge how consistent actions are with equity, fairness, and impartiality in the distribution of rewards and costs among individuals and groups.