Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.

2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.

Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.

ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2009 AYP Presentation.

Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)

District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.

Annual Student Performance Report September

Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.

Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 

Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 

District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.

Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2012 AYP Presentation.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.

2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.

- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

School Improvement Plan Review Galloping to Success Minneola Elementary Presented by Mrs. Watts.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report Including Challenge Index August, 2017.

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.

Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District

Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.

PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.

What’s Driving Chicago’s Educational Progress?

Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.

Evergreen Elementary School

2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results

Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services

Central City Elementary School

Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008

Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School

Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008

Presentation transcript:

Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report October 25, 2010

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Oklahoma Schools and Districts Timeline for Statewide Performance Targets Pursuant to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 API Base line 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Math 648 790 932 1074 1216 1358 1500 Reading 622 768 914 1060 1206 1352

Student Groups All Students Regular Education Students Black American Indian Hispanic Asian White Other Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners (ELL) Students with Individualized Education Programs (IEP)

API Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools 90% 10%

API Point Contributions for High Schools 80% 10% 10%

Changing Standards

Standards Raised for State Testing Program The SDE approved more rigorous standards for 3-8th grade math and reading students in 2008-09. Raised the bar for determining success “CUT SCORES” were increased Aligned proficiency levels closer to NAEP Math and reading scores declined statewide The new standards were used to determine API and AYP beginning with the 2009-10 school year.

Community Group Broken Arrow Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Putnam City Union

Community Group Comparison: 3rd Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 4th Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 5th Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 5th Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 6th Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 7th Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 8th Grade 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: 8th Grade 2009-10

District Testing Highlights: 2009-10 5th grade Social Studies…highest score (tied) since 2001-02 Writing…5 consecutive years with no score lower than 91% proficient Science…5 consecutive years with scores at 93% or higher 8th grade Science…7 consecutive years with scores at or above 90% proficient U.S. History…2nd highest score since 2001-02 Writing…highest score (98%) since 2001-02

Community Group Comparison: EOI 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: EOI 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: EOI 2009-10

Community Group Comparison: EOI 2009-10

District Testing Highlights: 2009-10 End-of-Instruction Geometry…highest score during three years of state testing English II…highest score since testing began in 2000-01 English III…tied the highest score during three years of state testing Biology I…highest score since testing began in 2002-03 U.S. History…tied the highest score over the last 10 years

Challenges: Non-proficient CRT population: “All Students” FAY/NFAY 26

Challenges: Non-proficient EOI population: “All Students” FAY/NFAY 27

EOI “cut score” Challenges