TA-SE THIRD GENERAL MEETING SAG: Civil Engineering Jakarta 21 - 23 March 2018

WE ARE NOW A FAMILY Thank you TUNING TA-SE

AGENDA/OUTCOMES Defining student’s workload: questionnaire survey Task 2: Bridging between Meta profile and your own program: Reflection to identify gaps Designing/Re-designing a programme: 10 steps in the Tuning Method: Leading towards 4th General Meeting in Bangkok in September Discussion on publication for the group

Agenda 1: Student’s Workload

Student Work Load Survey TUNING would like to run a survey on students’ typical work load in a semester Some time reference: may start about two month from now and must end latest June/July to be in time for analysis for 4th General Meeting in Bangkok We prefer to do the survey based on the present semester We suggested on 6th semester for 4 year programme and 8th semester on 5 year programme - we got agreement from Tuning

Agenda 2: Revisiting Task 2 META-PROFILE vs our own programme

META-PROFILE FRAMEWORK Civil Engineering Advantages The competencies that are in two domains allow our future graduates to posses the 21st century skills better The designation of importance in the meta-profile will demand more emphasis in the curriculum design as well as the teaching and learning as well as in the assessment of outcome attainment that follows

META-PROFILE Civil Engineering Personal Skills Social Values G1 G7 G10, G13 S13 Technical S3, S4,S6, S7,S14 S12 G3 G9,S1 S10,G12 G4 G2,G11, S2,S5,S8,S9,S11 G8,G6 G5 Only between Social and Personal Skills Reprioritising Importance Top in importance Medium in importance Bottom in importance

COMPETENCIES (Civil Engineering) - sorted by importance Social Skiils Technical Skiils Personal Skills Values Importance G1 Ability to work collaboratively and effectively in diverse contexts x Top G3 Ability to uphold professional, moral and ethical values G4 Ability to demonstrate responsibility and accountability towards the society and environment G5 Ability to communicate clearly and effectively G7 Ability to understand, value, and respect diversity and multiculturalism G9 Demonstrate problem solving abilities G12 Ability to demonstrate leadership attributes G13 Ability to apply knowledge into practice S1 Ability to show resilience S3 Ability to interpret engineering drawings S4 Ability to create processes to solve engineering problems S6 Ability to carry out civil engineering analysis S7 Ability to interpret engineering data S9 Ability to design civil engineering elements (e.g : structural, geoTech, water, transport &highway, env engr, etc) S12 Ability to uphold safety S14 Ability to integrate all civil engineering knowledge into a workable system G6 Ability to think critically, reflectively and innovatively Med G8 Ability to carry out lifelong learning and continuous professional development G10 Ability to initiate, plan, organise, implement and evaluate course of actions S8 Ability to utilise relevant design codes and regulations S10 Ability to monitor the progress and quality of civil engineering works S11 Ability to identify the appropriate construction technology and methods S13 Ability to evaluate the impact of engineering decisions G2 Ability to use information and communication technology purposefully and responsibly Low G11 Ability to conduct research S2 Ability to utilize knowledge in science and mathematics (including statistics) S5 Ability to apply the knowledge of material science

META-profile & Our Programmes Our responses have been documented in the package given for this meeting General conclusion: Some programs have more outcomes than the META-Profile competencies and some programs have fewer. Many did the comparison by mapping the two (their outcomes and the META-profile competencies Whilst many are able to match nicely, some programmes have more expected competencies compared to our META-Profile Competencies Everyone will re-look at their amended programme outcomes and will do another comparison with the META-profile

Appreciating and Starting the 10 Step (Re)Design Tuning Approach Agenda 3: Appreciating and Starting the 10 Step (Re)Design Tuning Approach

10 Steps in Summary 1 Name of the new or revised programme 6 Linking the degree with the agreed META-Profile 2 Length and the level of the programme 7 Define the structure of the programme 3 Explain the social need of the new or revised programme 8 Programme overall consistency 4 Future fields, sectors of employment of graduates 9 Internal Quality Control/Enhancement 5 Description of the degree profile (outcomes and competencies) 10 Other relevant aspects

Some Decisions/Findings All university will (re) design their existing programmes Good timing for a curriculum review Applying the Tuning methodology to a brand new program (coming semester) Applying the Tuning methodology as part of an existing curriculum review As part of the Continual Quality Improvement (CQI) All programmes are at Bachelor Degree 3/11 : 5 year program and 8/11: 4 year program

ACTIVITIES We spent time to review our programme outcomes. We compared our existing programme structure We shared our existing system Comparing our existing program structure gave rise to other opportunities like benchmarking, mobility/exchange programs, dual/double/joint degree possibilities and others.

Detailing a Course Structure Select one course Write the course objective and the course synopsis Come up with the Course Outcomes (CO) for this course Determine the assessment method to measure the attainment of these course outcomes Map each CO to your Programme Outcomes (PO) Everyone has to repeat this for all their courses, before they can check on the consistency of their programme.

Checking the consistency Mapping CO to PO Agenda 3: STEP 8 Checking the consistency Mapping CO to PO We reminded each other, that they must have this mapping

STEP 8

OUR ACHIEVEMENT STEP Activity TIME 1 Name of the new or revised programme Each university select one Done 2 Length and the level of the programme Each university decides 3 Explain the social needs of the new or revised programme Each university explains 4 Future fields, sectors of employment of graduates 5 Description of the degree profile (outcomes and competencies) Each university decides - based on existing or create new ones 6 Linking the degree with the agreed META-Profile Revisit Task 2 7 Define the structure of the programme Must also define course outcomes for each course Continue and complete 8 Programme overall consistency Mapping of courses (learning outcomes) to programme outcomes/competencies For next meeting 9 Internal Quality Control/Enhancement 10 Other relevant aspects

Agenda 4: Publication

DISCUSSION ON PUBLICATION We have to write a report for Civil Engineering SAG We need to plan for the report Is there any possibility of a journal publication?

Structure of the Report Content Time line Task 1 Introduction Sept 2018 Coordinator 2 Generic & Specific Competences Norhazilan 3 Consultation and Reflections 4 Meta-Profiles* 5 Programe Design* February 2019 To be determined 6 Student’s Work Load* 7 Implementation Experience July 2019 USM 8 Reflections of the TUNING methodology* 9 Conclusions * : Each team member will write their own report for compilation later

THANK YOU “Happy TUNING” See you in Bangkok in Sept 2018