Extemp Sources And Other Relevant Extemp Info Noah Recker - La Vernia HS
Simple Extemp Speeches Intro (1:30-1:45) 3 Main Points (1:30 each) Conclusion (:30)
What Goes In The Intro Intro is made of 7 parts with one embedded -Attention Getting Device (Joke, Quote, Analogy) -Bridge -Relevance (Source embedded) -Topic -Generic Answer -3 Main Points
The Importance of Background Info and Relevance From Ethan Reeves creator of Extemp Genie The General Context Behind A Question (What does it mean) Broad Knowledge on a Range of Diverse Subjects History, Economics, Geography Not Time Specific
What Does a Main Point Look Like Each Main Point Should Look Like an Argument From a Debate (Language will be altered for informative speeches) -Claim -Warrant (Information/Source) -Explanation of Impact or Importance for Informative
Conclusion The conclusion is simply restating the main points and topic of the speech. A tie-back to your introduction is also preferred.
The Wall Street Journal Bloomberg AP Source The Info Politico Sources that I commonly hear used in extemp speeches: Reuters The New York Times The Washington Post The Huffington Post The Wall Street Journal FOX News Business Insider BBC CNN The Guardian
Media Bias Chart https://www.adfontesmedia.com/
Associated Press (AP) Rating: Excellent Original Fact Reporting Neutral on Political Bias
InfoWars Rating: Questionable Extreme Right Wing Has Been Known to Have Inaccurate/Fabricated Info
The Huffington Post Rating: So-So Goes Hyper-Partisan Left at Times Although Well Written Falls To Opinion More Often Than Not
National Review Rating: So-So Often Skews Hyper-Partisan Right Does Have Fact Reporting But Can Contain Opinionated Analysis
Bloomberg Rating: Excellent Original Fact Reporting Once In A Blue Moon can Skew Right because of Economics
CNN Rating: Meh Articles are Typically Peppered with Persuasion Skews Every So Slightly Left
The Daily Mail Rating: Poor Incomplete Stories and Unfair Persuasion Skews Right
MSNBC Rating: Meh Persuasive Analysis but Often Balanced Hyper-Partisan Left in Reporting
The New York Times Rating: Decent Fact Reporting Skews Slightly Left (Hence President Trump’s Frustration with the Source)
Breitbart Rating: Poor Often Has Inaccurate and Sometimes Fabricated Info Most Extreme Right
BBC Rating: Solid Fact Reporting Although Taken From Other Sources Neutral in Political Bias
Politico Rating: Decent Fact Reporting Pulled From Other Sources Skews Slightly Left
Current Affairs Rating: Poor Mix of Fact Reporting and Analysis Skews Extreme Left at Times
Forbes Rating: Decent Mix of Fact Reporting and Analysis Skews Every So Slightly Right
Business Insider Rating: Decent Analysis with Some Fact Reporting In My Opinion Best Economic Source Because of Political Neutrality
FOX News Rating: Meh Sometimes Unfair Persuasion Hyper-Partisan Right Lots of Info - Just Point Out the Bias
The Wall Street Journal Rating: So-So Fact Reporting Often From Other Sources Skews Right Because of Economics
The Guardian Rating: So-So Fact Reporting Almost Exclusively From Other Sources Skews Left With Politics
The Economist Rating: So-So Mostly Fact Reporting with Some Analysis Skews Right at Times Because of Economics
ThinkTanks I would recommend thinktanks as sources as well. They are typically great sources.
Extemp Drills The Pinto Beans
Extemp Drills Circle Words
Extemp Drills The UM Olympics
Extemp Drills The Olden Catholic Nun
Extemp Drills Duck and Cover
Questions noah.recker@lvisd.org