Student expectations of Assessment and Feedback

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training Skills in note-making, summarising and report writing Module S5.
Advertisements

Student Opinion of Learning Activities on Computing Undergraduate Degrees John Colvin and Alan Phelan University of Worcester February 2006.
HNC/D Administration and IT Intended Outcome of the QRT Paula White.
Principles of Adult Education
PRESENTER: N. LEACH TRANSFORMING ASSESSMENTS An investigation into the assessment strategy for Commercial Law for Accountants 1.
BSc Final Year Projects in Computing Computer Science, Creative Computing, Games Programming, Business Computing Dr Rodger Kibble.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
Class Rep Training Breakout sessions. What we are going to do Meetings and approaching problems; New Assessment Policy; Scenario. Building Quality: What.
Assessment Ice breaker. Ice breaker. My most favorite part of the course was …. My most favorite part of the course was …. Introduction Introduction How.
COMP1927 Course Introduction 16x1
Saudi Board FM Curriculum
2013/14.  The Joint Project Board has published the arrangements for the joint teaching of the PCMD cohort of students.  This aims to safeguard the.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
Should employability be compulsory? Chris Wilkinson Careers Adviser “I always thought of employability as selling yourself for a.
Bloom, Assessment & Aims and Objectives Module: ES204 Lecturers – Dr Justin Rami.
Graphic Design: Album Cover. Learning Objectives To develop your understanding of audience and purpose To learn how to effectively use advanced tools.
National 4 & 5 Physical Education. Documents available on website Unit by Unit approach to Performance (package 1) Unit by Unit approach to Factors impacting.
Personal Tutoring in Psychology: An overview Cathy Craig School of Psychology 10/2/2016Personal Tutoring in Psychology1.
Liberating the curriculum
IDTA level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
Level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
Refresher Course on Assessment
Anthony Williams, Maria Northcote, Jason Morton and John Seddon
MSc in Advanced Computer Science Induction 2016/17
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
2.1 - Classification of skills
QMUL Model modules are credit-bearing and built into the curriculum.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event Practical Electronics
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
PowerPoint to accompany:
Information for studying GCSE English Language
Module 6 Note Taking and Revision Strategies
Learning awareness week
Transitions through higher education:
Factors facilitating academic success: a student perspective
An HN Accounting Practitioner’s Academic Year
Presentation Skills Workshop
Credit Risk Skills Workshop Training Evaluation Report
Grants Workshop.
Planning for Formative Assessment Online Workshop
Level 1 / 2 Engineering Moderation Key Issues.
Assessment Without Levels
The UK Professional Standards Framework
Marks/Exams Information – All Years
INTERPRETING COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
Final Report: design (and conduct) a survey (20%)
IT 161 – PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS
Continued Professional Development
Cmi course induction.
Topic Effective written feedback Level For science teachers Outcomes
Vicki Stokes School of Education 02/10/17
Student feedback for SACE Improvement
Dr Dana Hanna Research School of Economics
Grade one First term Second term Learning unit Learning unit
Lesson Planning 1 Susie Fawcett.
Assessment and Development of Core Skills in Engineering Mathematics
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Recognising and Recording Progress and Achievement Roadmap Use this roadmap to map your journey through your course and to self assess your progress every.
Bellringer What do teachers do in a typical day?.
Prof. L-J Eales-Reynolds
Introducing Assessment For Learning
Understanding tutorial observation practice
Evaluation tools training
How will my Degree be Classified
Welcome to Curriculum Design Workshop
How to deliver a Microsoft Cloud Workshop
IDTA level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
A Tool for Tapping into the Best of your Teams
Information on Business Studies
Presentation transcript:

Student expectations of Assessment and Feedback David Read

Purposes of the survey Two types of survey were performed. A Practice/Value surveys using zappers B Focus group discussions The findings were summarised in the documents sent out last week. The aims were (i) to find out what students think of our current provision in terms of assessment and feedback, and (ii) to learn more about the factors that influence their expectations.

Practice value surveys Based on a list of questions previously used in engineering. Surveys carried out in 1st, 2nd and 3rd year lectures to capture a large sample at each stage. Questions posed in pairs: Practice: Does the feedback you receive help you to improve? Value: How important is it that the feedback you receive helps you to improve?

1) Assessments clearly test the learning outcomes in the modules Are you familiar with the learning outcomes for a module? Y1: 2.9 Y2: 2.4 Y3: 2.4

2) All learning outcomes in a typical module are assessed Difficult by exam

3) Module requirements to achieve a 1st, 2:1, 2:2, 3rd and a pass are clear Y1 - uninformed

4) In a typical module, learning outcomes are assessed more than once and in different ways

5) Assessments are sensibly timetabled Opinions clouded by isolated bad experiences?

6) The feedback I receive helps me to improve Effect of in-class tests in Y1?

7) Feedback is given within the 2 week period.

8) The marks I receive are typically what I expect them to be.

Focus group discussions Four groups of 3-5 1st years, 3 Groups of 2-3 2nd years. Questions were given to them on a proforma so notes on the outcomes could be made and submitted. Questions were selected by JMD/DR.

Some key points: Four groups of 3-5 1st years, 3 Groups of 2-3 2nd years. Questions were given to them on a proforma so notes on the outcomes could be made and submitted. Questions were selected by JMD/DR. An opportunity to learn about the expectations of students – but not to pander to their every whim!

Some of the outcomes Practicals useful for developing skills – but are the reports always appropriate? Tutorials very popular with Y2 – is the nature of the delivery variable, though? Workshops – Y1 appreciate being able to ask for help and identify problem areas. Y2 less favourable. What can we do to make workshops more useful?

Some of the outcomes Student expectations need to be managed (a clearer expression from us of what they weill get and more consistent application would help). Many students recognise that less feedback will be given at university compared to school. Don’t underestimate the degree of spoon feeding/exam training many will have received at school. It’s a different world!

Any questions?