LSP Fast-Reroute Using RSVP Detours

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
Advertisements

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-01 Chandrasekar Ramachandran Markus.
RSVP Support in MediaBase VoD Streamer Improving QoE for VOD Subscribers using RSVP Sanjay Mehta
MPLS additions to RSVP Tunnel identification Tunnel parameter negotiation Routing policy distribution Routing debugging information Scalability improvements.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 12 FastReRoute (FRR) - Big Picture.
Jan 13, 2006Lahore University of Management Sciences1 Protection Routing in an MPLS Network using Bandwidth Sharing with Primary Paths Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
Restoration Routing in MPLS Networks Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences.
Path Protection in MPLS Networks Ashish Gupta Design and Evaluation of Fault Tolerance Algorithms with Performance Constraints.
December 20, 2004MPLS: TE and Restoration1 MPLS: Traffic Engineering and Restoration Routing Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science and Engineering Lahore.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering
Path Protection in MPLS Networks Using Segment Based Approach.
RATES: A Server for MPLS Traffic Engineering (Routing And Traffic Engineering Server) Zlatokrilov Haim Advanced Topics in IP Networks5/1/2001 Tel-Aviv.
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
November th Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-05.txt.
61st IETF Washington DC November 2004 Detecting P2MP Data Plane Failures draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-00.txt Seisho Yasukawa -
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS Introduction Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering Ji-Hoon Yun Computer Communications and Switching Systems Lab.
Protection and Restoration Definitions A major application for MPLS.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for Point to Multipoint TE LSPs R.Aggarwal, D.Papadimitriou, and S.Yasukawa (Editors) and contributors (L.Berger, I.Bryskin, D.Cheng,
Research Unit in Networking - University of Liège A Distributed Algorithm for Weighted Max-Min Fairness in MPLS Networks Fabian Skivée
Support Shared Mesh Protection in MPLS-TP March 27, 2011 Ping Pan (Infinera) Sam Aldrin (Huawei) Luyuan Fang (Cisco)
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
Kireeti Kompella draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-01
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
Pseudo-Wire Protection Ping Pan IETF 63.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-00 Chandra Ramachandran Yakov Rekhter.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 79th IETF - BeiJing Signaling Extension for MPLS Ring Yong Huang.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
EE 122: Integrated Services Ion Stoica November 13, 2002.
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Label Distribution Protocols LDP: hop-by-hop routing RSVP-TE: explicit routing CR-LDP: another explicit routing protocol, no longer under development.
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection Huaimo.
Pseudo-Wire Protection Ping Pan IETF 65.
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-00 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Yuji Kamite (NTT Communication) IETF 83, Paris, France.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection Huaimo.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Inter domain signaling protocol
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
Use Cases for Using PCE to act as a Central Controller (PCECC) Component draft-zhao-teas-pce-central-controller-use-cases-00.txt 95th Buenos Aires.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02
EE 122: Lecture 16/17 (Integrated Services)
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection
An analysis of scaling issues in MPLS-TE backbone networks
IETF 96 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh Kireeti Kompella (presenting)
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
LDP Extensions for RMR draft-esale-mpls-ldp-rmr- extensions
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Egress Local Protection
draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-00
IETF 98 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh (presenting) Kireeti Kompella
Staged Refresh Timers for RSVP
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
IETF 102 (TEAS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh (presenting) Kireeti Kompella
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
Pseudo-Wire Protection
Presentation transcript:

LSP Fast-Reroute Using RSVP Detours Ping Pan (presenter) IETF 51, 8/6/2001

Motivation Flexible Protect user traffic from both link and node failure. Minimize user intervention and configuration.

Operation A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E Fast-reroute Request Detour Setup A B C D E Fast Reroute A B C D E

Operation (detour merging) F G A B C D E Detour Merging: Merging all detour reservations that come from different ingress, but have the same egress and next-hop. Goal: To shrink the states.

Process detour LSP’s independently Protocol Issues Fast-Reroute Request Inside Path messages FAST-REROUTE object Detour path parameters (e.g. bandwidth, etc.) Detour Setup Use IGP/TE to setup a new LSP DETOUR object Detour destination (learnt from RRO) Process detour LSP’s independently

Flexible and extensible Summary Flexible and extensible Guarantee CoS and b/w per LSP. Single solution for both node and link protection. Adaptive: Does not require all nodes to support it. Minimal user intervention. Operational. Require IGP/TE and RRO support.

Scaling Issues Designed to protect selective LSP’s. Support detour LSP merging to reduce the total number of LSP’s. Refresh reduction helps!