DISCUSSION ON MEASURING DISABILITY IN POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COGNITION. Cognition Questions Do you have difficulty remembering or concentrating? Split Interviews: How often do you have difficulty remembering important.
Advertisements

1 ESCAP/WHO Pilot Study Overview Wei Liu Statistics Division, ESCAP Sixth Meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, Kampala,
Self-Care Question: Cognitive Testing Results 6 th Annual Mtg UN Washington Group on Disability Statistics Kampala, Uganda October 10-13, 2006.
10 th Meeting of the Washington Group Results from the UNESCAP and the Granada Group testing Luxembourg November 3 – 5, 2010.
Short Set Update Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant To NCHS.
Disability Cognitive Test: The Philippine Experience Presented by: Carmelita N. Ericta Administrator, PNSO 6 th Annual Meeting of the Washington Group.
Suggestions for Implementing the Disability Measure By Group (2)
Country Report on the Pre Test to Improve Disability Measurement Statistics Sri Lanka 2009 (UNESCAP /WG supported)
GENERAL REPORT OF THE COGNITIVE TESTING MÉXICO INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA, GEOGRAFÍA E INFORMÁTICA (INEGI) Sixth meeting of the Washington Group.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part I.
SPECA Regional Wrokshop on Disability Statistics, Dec 13-15, 2006 Issues Related to Disability Measurement: Cognitive testing and mode Jennifer Madans.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability: The Work of the Washington Group (continued) Daniel Mont Disability and Development Group The World Bank.
Mauritian experience in participating in the Washington Group Workshop.
Presentation on Field tests Margie Schneider Dan Mont 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala, Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006.
Cognition domain Cognition domain 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 Andres Montes ESCAP Statistics Division.
Different approaches an analysis might use when investigating a system including: – Questionnaires – Interviews – Document gathering and analysis.
1 Task Force on Health Expectancies National Disability Survey and Sport and Physical Exercise Module Gerry Brady Central Statistics Office, Ireland Luxembourg.
The DHS Program Pilot of a Household Survey Disability Module 6 OCTOBER 2015.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
Questionnaires How to gain relevant/useful information using the self report technique.
Cognitive test Results Mobility Question By LYDIA MOTHIBELI 6 th Annual meeting of WG Uganda Lesotho Cognitive test Lesotho Cognitive test.
Cognitive test results and Finalization of the Module on Child Functioning and Disability Mitchell Loeb (with Kristen Miller & Meredith Massey) NCHS Washington,
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Y CENSOS – ARGENTINA “The measurement of disability in Argentina” Tenth Annual Meeting of the WG, Luxembourg - Noviembre.
Sampling Design and Analysis MTH 494 Ossam Chohan Assistant Professor CIIT Abbottabad.
The Cognitive Survey for Mauritius – test and results Presented by: Mr Chettun Kumar ARIANAICK Statistician.
Country pre-test results: Vietnam VietnamBy Nguyen Phong Nguyen Dinh Chung General Statistics Office 6th Annual Meeting of the Washington Group in Kampala,
Democratic Republic of the Congo Cognitive Test Results Question 6 Communication 6th Washington Group on Disability Statistics 10th-13th October 2006 Jean.
TANZANIA- COGNITIVE TEST RESULTS QUESTIONS ON HEARING By. Ms. Albina Chuwa October, 2006.
MOROCCAN EXPERIENCE ON DISABILITY STATISTICS THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO HIGH COMMISSION OF PLANNING BY ZINEB EL OUAZZANI TOUAHAMI Statistician Engineer Directorate.
Questionnaire-Part 2. Translating a questionnaire Quality of the obtained data increases if the questionnaire is presented in the respondents’ own mother.
Meeting of the Washington Group 1 Tenth meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Welcome and opening remarks.
Presentation on Census and Questionnaires Dr. Mukhtar Ahmad Executive Director National Institute of Population Studies.
CHAPTER-3 RESEARCH DESIGNS Shrikant Diwan.
Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG16)
UNICEF/WG MODULE ON CHILD FUNCTIONING: TESTING and ANALYSIS
UNICEF/WG Module on Child Functioning
Methodologies & Procedures for Evaluation
Methodologies and Procedures for Evaluating Coverage and Content Error Pres. 6 United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2010 World Programme on Population.
Chapter 6: Checklists, Rating Scales & Rubrics
What is our goal in our TL Class?
Main outcomes of the group discussions in internet self-response
Measuring Disability in Population and Housing Censuses
AGE AND DISABILITY INCLUSIVE DATA COLLECTION.
Aging Out of foster care and the transition into adulthood
Avoiding Questionnaires
Population and Housing Topics (Bhutan)
Discussion Topics.
Cognitive Interview Obstacles
Select Items with High Burden
Read the quote and with the person next to you, discuss what you think it means. Do you agree? Why / why not? Be prepared to share your thoughts with the.
Multi-Mode Data Collection Approach
Towards improved measures of disability for development indicators
Session 8 Data Processing
The cognitive model in answering questions Marco Ballin
MY Friend has Autism.
RECAP – name the type of sampling
Identifying Gender Minorities in Population-based Proxy Surveys
for disability data collection in Viet Nam
Xingyan Wen Ros Madden Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant
BMTRY 738: The Study Population
Mystery Partner Silently, list your favorite hobbies, activities and special strengths on your notecard. Draw a picture, use a symbol or in some way.
Empathy Project = Life Learning Students
Practical Issues- BUT FOR WHICH METHOD?
Multi-Mode Data Collection Approach
3 Psychological investigations
What information to collect?
Multi-Mode Data Collection
the NATIONAL STATISTICAL COMMITTEE of the KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
Methodologies and Procedures for Evaluating Coverage and Content Error Pres. 6 United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2010 World Programme on Population.
Presentation transcript:

DISCUSSION ON MEASURING DISABILITY IN POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS GROUP II

What questions were asked on disability in the last census or will be asked the census will be taken in 2017 or 2018? Qn: Does [NAME] has difficulty (a) Walking (b) Seeing (c) Hearing (d) Cognition (e) Self-care (f) Communication Also albinism was added In Tanzania and Swaziland This Washington group was asked in Ethiopia and Sudan as well, though in Ethiopia was introduced only during pilot but not actual enumeration

Were the questions on the disability tested Were the questions on the disability tested? If so, what was tested and what were the results? The question was tested in all countries except for Libya where did not conduct Population Census There were some degree of disability noted, people didn’t hide much on disability for the member of the household

What is the experience on the use of proxy respondents to obtain data on disability about other members of the household? It is difficult to get to the correct degree of disability, though respondent may be eager to mention disability of a person

What is the experience on the translation of questions on disability into different local languages in the country? Most of the time the question is distorted from its true meaning through translation and hence decrease credibility of the disability data obtained

If the question(s) on disability included the use of scaled response categories, what was the experience? Are they easily translated into local languages and easily understood by respondents? It is difficult to get the right response categories as this question is more subjective (depend on someone view on level of disability difficulties one have) It is not easy to translate into local languages as it impose some difficulties in understanding to respondents

What is the overall experience in how the questions on disability worked in the field? Did respondents easily provide the information? Did the interviewers ask the questions as intended? Generally disability questions is very sensitive, hence respondent pause a little bit before starting to answer They don’t ask questions as intended, normally there is a degree of humanity which try to pull back respondent