<month year> doc.: IEEE < > <May 2017>

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE xxx Submission January 2015 N. Sato and K. Fukui (OKI)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE l2r Submission September 2012 N. Sato & K. FukuiSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE wng Submission May 2012 N. Sato, K. Fukui & T. HerbstSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
November 2010 doc.: IEEE e Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: LB60 comment.
<month year> doc.: IEEE < > <September 2017>
June 17, 2018 doc.: IEEE r0 January, 2005
<month year> doc.: IEEE s May 2015
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ULI protocol stack and flows of operations]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
Submission Title: Coding example for the ULI
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal of ULI primitives for handling profiles]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for ULI primitives] Date Submitted:
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PIB Coordination in g] Date Submitted:
<month year> doc.: IEEE < > <September 2017>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < > <January 2018>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ to adaptation.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Handling of non-ULI frame and Profile.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for ULI primitives] Date Submitted:
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
<month year> <Sept 2018>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < > <September 2017>
<May,2009> doc.: IEEE <doc .....> <July 2009>
Submission Title: Example of P2P route discovery
Submission Title: Coding example for the ULI
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: Coding example for the ULI
Submission Title: [Comment Resolutions for #345, #347, #348, and #349]
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
平成31年1月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c motion.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ULI “Profile” for Protocol Management] Date.
Source: [Pat Kinney] Company [Kinney Consulting LLC]
平成31年2月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2008
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ULI protocol stack and flows of operations]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> Julyl 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ to adaptation.
平成31年2月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2007
<month year> November, 2004
<author>, <company>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
<month year> <Nov 2018>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
<month year> <January 2019>
Submission Title: LB Resolutions from kivinen
Submission Title: [Comment Resolutions for #345, #347, #348, and #349]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE August 2014
平成31年5月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 September 2007
<month year> doc.: IEEE May 2014
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
<month year> doc.: IEEE < > <March 2019>
doc.: IEEE < IETF>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<author>, <company>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [15.4j Coordinator Switching] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE < IETF>
平成31年7月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 March 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Call.
March 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Draft 1 security change proposal] Date Submitted:
平成31年7月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2007
Source: [Chunhui Zhu] Company [Samsung]
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: More LB156 Comment Resolution Date Submitted:
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<15-16-0666-00-0012> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<15-16-0666-00-0012> <May 2017> Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [L2R operations with ULI] Date Submitted: [8 May 2017] Source: [Noriyuki Sato, Kiyoshi Fukui] Company [Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.] Address [2-6-8, Bingo-machi, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan] Voice:[+81-6-6260-0700], E-Mail:[sato652@oki.com] Re: [L2R operations with ULI] Abstract: [Operation considerations of IEEE802.15.10, architectural and functional discussion] Purpose: [To discuss] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

<May 2017> Purpose To identify unclear points and issues when considering incorporating L2R to the ULI by looking at the current ULI architecture, formats and functionality and to provide resolution. The issues are summarized into two categories. Format Dispatch Discovery Architecture Functions and Procedures Security and Key management <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

1. Format issues Dispatch Discovery Where should L2R IE be inserted? <May 2017> 1. Format issues Dispatch Where should L2R IE be inserted? Discovery How is it done with L2R discovery? <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Two places where a dispatch happens <May 2017> <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Dispatching a frame for L2R <May 2017> Dispatching a frame for L2R A S B D S A B D Protocol A Protocol A PDE PDE PDE PDE L2R L2R L2R L2R Dispatching by looking at Protocol ID in MPX IE. MMI MMI MMI MMI MAC MAC MAC MAC Dispatching by looking at L2R routing IE 21 octets 2 octets 1 octet 2 octets variable octets Various octets Transaction Protocol MAC MPX IE Protocol A Payload Control Identifier L2R routing IE = x XXXX The Number 0xXXXX is for the Protocol A. (e.g. IPv4 etc.) <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Dispatching a frame for L2R – 6LoWPAN mesh under <May 2017> Dispatching a frame for L2R – 6LoWPAN mesh under A S B D S A B D 6LoWPAN 6LoWPAN 6LoWPAN 6LoWPAN PDE PDE PDE PDE L2R L2R L2R L2R Dispatching by looking at ULI-6lo IE MMI MMI MMI MMI MAC MAC MAC MAC Dispatching by looking at L2R routing IE 21 octets variable octets 2 octets 2 octets 1 octet 6 LoWPAN IPHC NHC MAC L2R routing IE ULI - 6 lo IE 6 LoWPAN <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

<May 2017> Discovery L2R-D IE is included in EB or EBR for the L2R discovery to know if they speak L2R protocol and to know what routing functions are supported. What is the ULI discovery purpose? To know if ULI frame is understandable? To exchange capability? Is it used in EB or EBR same as L2R? ULI discovery and L2R discovery can be happened at same time? Including ULI IE and L2R-D IE in one EB or EBR <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Conclusion for the format issue <May 2017> Conclusion for the format issue Regarding L2R dispatch…, L2R IE should be used to dispatch to L2R box. L2R IE should be inserted between MPX IE and the payload in case that MPX IE is used. Between ULI-6lo IE and the MHR in case that ULI-6lo IE is used. Need to clarify what ULI discovery is. Consider using L2R-D IE with ULI IE in same EB/EBR if ULI discovery concept is same as L2R’s. <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

<May 2017> 2. Architecture Other MAC protocol is managed by protocol box between PDE and MMI to use their MAC functionality. L2R is designed so that upper layer manages by using L2R functionality (primitives and PIBs). L2R needs a management box above it. <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Candidates to place L2R management box <May 2017> 3 2 1 <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Candidates to place L2R management box (contd.) <May 2017> Candidates to place L2R management box (contd.) #1 is located at inside of L2R box. L2R specific functions can be managed here. #2 is located at inside of PDE box. Using KMP with L2R and managing L2R security PIB can be managed here. #3 is located at application layer. It can manage several protocol boxes from upper layer. Since PDE is very common function among protocol boxes, placing here may be disfavored. #2 can be merged to #3. <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Ref. Functionalities that higher layer need to manage <May 2017> Ref. Functionalities that higher layer need to manage No. item Page in IEEE802.15.10 Which box should manage Description 1 Short address management P.27 P.38-39 3 PAN coordinator manages short addresses for all devices within the PAN using PANC DC (PAN coordinator direct connection) that is exchanged by a transport protocol other than L2R or ULI. Application layer manages it. 2 Source rout management P.54, P.64, P.66, P.67 In no-storing mode, all DS path information is gathered to mesh root. Appropriate path list need to be generated everytime when data is sent. Procedure through PANC DC P.38-39, P.77 A mesh root with PANC DC (PAN coordinator direct connection) which is up to a higher layer of L2R need to exchange the information with PAN coordinator through PANC DC for the following two functions. 1. Short address management 2. Broadcast to all devices within a PAN 4 PAN discovery P.28-31 Before starting or joining an L2R mesh, an L2R device does the discovery process in order to find an appropriate PAN to associate to. This process should be controlled by a next higher layer of an L2R sublayer. 5 Procedure for starting a new L2R mesh P.26 Configuration of an L2R mesh when a device starts a new L2R mesh using profile. 6 Procedure for joining a L2R mesh P.32, P34 Configuration of an L2R device when a device joins a L2R mesh using profile 7 Mesh selection procedure P.33 In the case that l2rMeshSelection is FALSE, after mesh discovery process, a next higher layer of a joining L2R device needs to select a mesh to join from discovery results. 8 Mesh root management P.26-28 Management related to mesh root. 9 Mesh device management P.28-37 Management for join and leave.. 10 Procedure for detecting a disconnection from the L2R mesh P.36 When a next higher layer of an L2R sublayer is indicated that it is disconnected from the L2R mesh, it should do something. 11 Procedure for detecting a new L2R mesh P.43 When L2R device finds a new L2R mesh, it should do discovery process in order to get information necessary for add ion of new entry to MT. 12 Process for detecting an unknown neighbor P.69 L2R sublayer inform to its next higher layer that it detects an unknown neighbor. In this case, the next higher layer should …… 13 Separation of concatenated frame using Dcat feature P.73 When Dcat is used, L2R sublayer of final destination delivers the concatenated frame to the next higher layer. It should be separated to the individual frames. 14 Security procedure P.78-81 After key exchange using KMP, the exchanged key is set to the MAC PIB and other necessary security IB is set to the L2IB. <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Conclusion for the architecture issue <May 2017> Conclusion for the architecture issue Assumption to place two boxes to manage L2R functionalities A box in L2R protocol box manages L2R specific process and the boundary to the L2R is interfaced by L2R primitives and PIBs. A box in application layer manages PAN coordinator DC and security things. <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>

Questions? <May 2017> <Noriyuki Sato><Kiyoshi Fukui>, <OKI>