MFF 2021-2027: Main changes between AMF and AMIF concerning legal migration and integration DG HOME – unit B1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

1 RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES Synergy in using FP7 and SFs for the development of Research Infrastructures Warsaw, 13 February 2006 Hervé Pero, European Commission.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
EU support to social economy & social entrepreneurship Ciprian Alionescu DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
European Social Fund Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF Franz Pointner, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
ATLANTIC STRATEGY and EU Cohesion Policy
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
European Development Fund (EDF)
Financial Instruments in Cohesion Policy DG REGIO, Open Days, Brussels, October 2013 Financial Instruments for SMEs- A regional example.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Social Europe Social economy and social innovation – a powerful combination Oana AILENEI European Comission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Social Inclusion.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
Common Strategic Framework (CSF) Dr Anna Hadyńska Expert for the CSF Marshal’s Cabinet Marshal Office of the Wielkopolska Region
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
The European agenda on improving the efficiency of employment and social policies: Bratislava, December 2011 The example of social experimentation.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Fostering the urban dimension Analysis of Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
European policy perspectives on social experimentation Antoine SAINT-DENIS and Szilvia KALMAN, European Commission - DG Employment, social affairs and.
Cross border cooperation programmes in the period Csaba Hende Körmend, 07/11/2012.
The European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument DG RELEX UNIT ER-D-1 European Neighbourhood Policy Coordination – General Coordination.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
SFC2014 and Home Affairs programmes for Stephanie Hardy Directorate General Home Affairs
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
Youth Employment Initiative SAWP 22 March 2013 Manuela GELENG, European Commission – DG EMPL.
1 Cohesion policy post 2013 Jiri Svarc Head of Unit for Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Regional Policy Integrated Territorial Approaches Madrid, 22 February 2013.
The LIFE Programme Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina LIFE External Assistance Regional coordinator Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Green.
ATLANTIC STRATEGY and EU Cohesion Policy
Training and Development Programme for future Structural Funds Trainers February 2006.
Lessons learned from the evaluation of the ESF
Leader as a part of the new CAP
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
EU Budget for the future Cohesion Policy Cosenza, 10 July 2018
Mid-Term Review Package on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
Multiannual Financial Framework review and post-2020 studies
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 8 February 2018
European policy perspectives on social experimentation
…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!
ESF Informal Technical Working Group meeting Brussels,
Panel 1: Synergies between policies and EU funds Creating dynamics and impacts Grzegorz Gajewski DG Migration and Home Affairs EU Funds for integration.
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Future of Cohesion Policy
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
EU's climate change tracking system and support for developing countries Using Country Systems to Manage Climate Change Finance A Global Forum 2-3.
Thematic workshop 2 – Smart Energy Systems Brussels, 8 November 2013
Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative – state of play
EU rural development policy
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
EU centralised programmes for Social Farming
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
European Social Fund.
Presentation transcript:

MFF 2021-2027: Main changes between AMF and AMIF concerning legal migration and integration DG HOME – unit B1

General context: a substantial increase of EU Funds for Migration and Borders Source: visual communication, chapter 4, title Communication chapter 4, text: communication p.17 MATCHING PRIORITIES WITH RESOURCES To turn the political priorities agreed at EU level into results on the ground, well-designed programmes must be equipped with sufficient resources to make a difference. As explained in the Commission’s contribution to the Informal Leaders’ Meeting in February, decisions taken on levels of financing for the future long-term budget cannot be separated from the Union’s ambitions in each of the priority areas. The Commission’s proposals are based on a rigorous assessment of the resources needed to deliver efficiently on the Union’s goals, and of the efficiency and added value of spending in each area. Through well-designed programmes, efficient implementation and intelligent combination with other sources of financing, even a modest EU budget can have a significant impact. However, there are limits to what this can achieve and, if Europe wants to move forward together on its positive agenda, it will require a budget to match. The key challenge for the future EU budget is to provide adequate support for new and existing priorities while also addressing the shortfall in national contributions resulting from the United Kingdom’s withdrawal. The Commission proposes a balanced approach. New priorities should be financed predominantly by new resources. The shortfall arising from the United Kingdom’s departure should be partly matched by new resources and partly by savings and redeployments from existing programmes. In order for the EU budget to make a meaningful contribution in many of the new priority areas, in particular where new instruments are being created, current levels of funding will need to be increased. Investing now in areas such as research and innovation, young people and the digital economy will pay rich dividends for future generations. This is why the Commission proposes significant increases in priority areas. Note: Compared to Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 at EU-27, including European Development Fund Source: European Commission

AMIF 2014-2020 AMF 2021 - 2027   A much higher initial amount for AMF: +50% in comparison with total AMIF (including Top-ups) AMIF initial: EUR 3,137 bn AMIF initial + Top-ups (mostly emergency funding): EUR 6,888 bn AMF proposal: EUR 10,415 bn

  A higher percentage (50%) of non-pre-allocated funds in AMF to react to crisis/emergencies Amounts of Funds pre-allocated in AMIF initial: 2,39 bn / 3,137 bn = 76% Amounts of Funds pre-allocated in AMF proposal: 5,207 bn / 10,415 bn = 50% Funds not pre-allocated: 5,207 bn = 50%

Use of non-pre-allocated funds in AMF

A streamlined definition of the legal migration/integration objective   A streamlined definition of the legal migration/integration objective general objective: (b) to support legal migration to the Member States in accordance with their economic and social needs, such as labour market needs, while safeguarding the integrity of the immigration systems of Member States, and to promote the effective integration of third-country nationals; (b) to support legal migration to the Member States including to contribute to the integration of third-country nationals; And more detailed text in Annex as implementation measure

Reinforced complementarity AMF with ESF+ and ERDF for integration interventions Complementary to actions financed under the European Social Fund. Authorities requested to cooperate and establish coordination mechanisms Same provisions but in addition: AMF: tailor-made + early stage measures horizontal actions supporting Member States’ capacities ESF+ and ERDF: intervention with a longer-term impact  

Scope of intervention cf. AMIF text    cf. AMIF text Under legal migration, similar to AMIF - development of mobility schemes - assistance in relation to a change of status Under integration similar to AMIF but: - focus on early integration measures and integration programmes) - No mention of labour market integration preparatory measures (ESF)

A focus on local and regional level (shared and direct management)   A focus on local and regional level (shared and direct management) No specific provision in AMIF - Higher cofinancing rate - Focus of thematic facility on integration

Shared management: more updated data for calculation of national envelopes   Calculation of AMIF national envelopes based on a minimum amount and historical data (average ERF-RF-EIF 2011-2013 Minimum amount and criteria defined in the annex to the regulation (available data from latest 3 years).

Shared management: no more minimum amount   In AMIF, at least 20% for Asylum and 20% for integration in national programmes unless justified No more minimum amount, allocation between the three priorities will be negotiated at programming stage

Shared management: no more need for joint specific actions In AMIF, specific actions used to top-up national programmes envelopes for certain objectives For integration, Joint initiatives amongst Member States in the field of integration   In AMF, no more joint specific action: transnational or national projects in line with the objectives of this Regulation