Horndon SMER 29th November 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Original Figures for "Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring"
Advertisements

Training Outline – Attendance Clerks
Copyright © 2005 Advantica Inc. (USA Only) and Advantica Ltd. (Outside USA). All rights reserved by the respective owner. Own Use Gas Review of Pre-heater.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Ch 23 pages Lecture 15 – Molecular interactions.
Recommendation for Board approval of updated nodal fee filing Steve Byone Overview –Historical summary –Highlights from approved interim Nodal Surcharge.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
WEYGANDT. KIESO. KIMMEL. TRENHOLM. KINNEAR. BARLOW. ATKINS PRINCIPLES OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING CANADIAN EDITION Chapter 6 Inventory Costing Prepared by:
Spiceland | Thomas | Herrmann Financial Accounting Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Using cluster analysis for Identifying outliers and possibilities offered when calculating Unit Value Indices OECD NOVEMBER 2011 Evangelos Pongas.
Preliminary Class Size Report Based on 10/26/2012 Unaudited Register December 2012.
Sub-regional Workshop on Census Data Evaluation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, November 2011 Evaluation of Age and Sex Distribution United Nations Statistics.
Far Shore Wind Climate Modelling Background Far shore wind conditions are expected to be favorable for wind energy power production due to increased mean.
Significant Figures Always record data as accurately as you can (as many sig. figs. as method allows) The last digit of the value that you record should.
Training Outline – Attendance Clerks
TDTIMS Overview What is TDTIMS? & Why Do We Do It?
Horndon SMER – Proposed Methodology July Overview Background Identification of the Error Correction of the Error Data Processing Rules.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
1 Detection of discontinuities using an approach based on regression models and application to benchmark temperature by Lucie Vincent Climate Research.
PeopleSoft Travel/Expense CONUS. Overview What is driving this change? What is changing? Where can I find all this information? FSKU Process impact demo.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
F8: Audit and Assurance. 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section A: Audit Framework and Regulation Section B: Internal audit Section.
Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods
Peter Linde, Interviewservice Statistics Denmark
Physical Properties of Gases
Measurement 1.2 Please Do Now
Horndon Temperature Error (SMER)
Chapter 6: INVENTORY COSTING
Time Series Consistency
Time Series Consistency
HFT 2401 Chapter 10 Inventory.
Inventories and Cost of Goods Sold
Chapter 6: INVENTORY COSTING
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
Accounting for Inventories
Preliminary Analysis of EOG/EVOS Data – Greene County 2009,2010,2011
Copyright John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement - Update
Chapter 5 Inventory Chapter 5.
Chronic Absenteeism Equity Profile
What in the world is “math 2”?!?!
Session 7: Adjustment for quality changes
Monitoring and Information Systems
הערכת משתנים שאינם קוגניטיביים במרכז הערכה למיון מועמדים לרפואה
IB BIOLOGY INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
Nexus Meter Read Performance April 2018
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Scotland’s Shared Axis Energy Diagram
Verification of Answer Documents (formerly Tested Roster)
Modification th July 2008.
Validation of WStatR-Data
Genome-wide Transcriptome Profiling Reveals the Functional Impact of Rare De Novo and Recurrent CNVs in Autism Spectrum Disorders  Rui Luo, Stephan J.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA
UIG Task Force Progress Report
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Objectives Explain the kinetic theory of matter.
GTAC Workshop Block 1 10 July 2018.
CHAPTER 10 CONTROLLING THE MANAGEMENT PROCESS.
Data processing German foreign trade statistics
Project Nexus Workgroup
FTE Recalibration Kendra Jahnke June 2018.
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
Scatterplots, Association and Correlation
Modifications to TDG Monitoring and Tracking
Nexus Workgroup Read Validation Scenarios
MOD 565 Standards of Service
Chapter 5 Hypothesis Tests With Means of Samples
Colin J. Akerman, Darragh Smyth, Ian D. Thompson  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Horndon SMER 29th November 2011

Overview Background Methodology Results Comparison with other sites Bias and Standard Deviation Changes in Gas Source Results Daily Average Temperature Error Daily Corrections Overall Result

Identification of Error Problem started in Sept 2008. Prior to this there were also intermittent low temperature readings

Correction of Error Nearby sites investigated for temperature correlation were: Matching Green, Luxborough Lane, Shorne, Yelverton, Roudham Heath, Gt Wilbraham and BarkingPS.

Bias and Standard Deviation 1 Temperatures can only be compared during flowing periods. Low DP cut-off will be used to indicate if the site was flowing or not Downstream to upstream temperature correction of 0.5 °C/bar used Bias will exist between temperatures because of differences in site installations and locations. The bias was investigated for a known good period (July 2010 to Dec 2010) Count Bias Standard deviation Luxborough Lane 17088 -0.52 1.64 Matching Green 14670 -1.32 1.11 Shorne 8313 +0.26 1.84 Yelverton 17144 +2.44 1.56 Gt Wilbraham 18016 +2.90 2.01 Roudham Heath 18004 +3.51 1.81

Step Changes in Temperature

Change in gas composition

Change in pressure profile

Bias and Standard Deviation 2 Calculation of bias separated by pressure difference between Horndon and Matching Green. This reduced the standard deviation. Points at which a site started flowing were excluded from the analysis until the temperature stabilised and reflected the real gas temperature. Higher pressure at Horndon than Matching Green (H) Lower pressure at Horndon than Matching Green (M) Initial calculation Bias Std Dev Matching Green +1.72 0.76 +0.83 0.59 +1.32 1.11 Luxborough Lane +1.09 0.63 -0.47 0.83 +0.52 1.65 Shorne +1.15 0.99 -1.23 1.00 -0.26 1.84 Yelverton -1.61 0.97 -3.60 1.02 -2.44 1.56 Roudham Heath -2.58 1.32 -4.91 1.08 -3.51 1.81 Great Wilbraham -1.90 1.55 -4.42 1.22 -2.90 2.01

Correction of Error Yelverton, Gt Wilbraham and Roudham Heath were excluded from the final analysis because of higher bias and standard deviation values than other sites which may be attributed to the distance from Horndon. The average of the (bias corrected) temperatures was used to calculate the temperature error. The temperature error was consistent for long periods from July 2008 to July 2009 and July 2009 to July 2010. Before and after this period the error is taken to be zero with explainable fluctuations around zero.

Daily Average Temperature Error

Intermittent Negative Temperature Differences

Intermittent Negative Temperature Differences Not an Error

Data Processing Rules Where data is erroneous (such as during periods of validation) the erroneous data was corrected before calculation. Where data was missing for up to 30 minutes the last good value was used. Where data was missing for longer than 30 minutes no correction was made, except for essential data (Horndon DP, P, T; Matching Green P) which were interpolated. The temperature error was calculated on a daily basis. Where no suitable flowing data was present the temperature error for the surrounding days was applied (Except in Sept 2008).

15th & 22nd Sept 2008 No daily average temperature due to lack of flowing data and transient temperature error. Detailed analysis of non-flowing data on these dates highlighted errors of 7.4 °C and 22.1 °C respectively.

Correction of Error The flow error was found to be sensitive to pressure fluctuations therefore it was necessary to recalculate the flow rates from the raw data. One set of calculations was made on a four-minutely basis using the corrected temperature and another using the recorded temperature. Daily volumes were calculated for both sets of data, the ratio between them being described as the ‘daily correction factor’. The uncorrected calculated daily volume was compared to the billed daily volume and where the difference was more than 10% a default daily correction factor was applied. This was the average of the factors on surrounding period. The daily correction factor will be applied to the daily volume and energy totals.

5th – 8th July 2010 RBD data missing from 10:06 on 5th July 2010 until 17:03 on 8th July 2010 Assumed default daily correction factor for 5th and 7th July 2010. Only count half of Error on 7th July 2010.

Further questions are welcome www.GL-NobleDenton.com