Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advertisements

Christopher P. Bridge, Christos Ioannou, J. Alison Noble 
A multinational audit of small field output factors calculated by treatment planning systems used in radiotherapy  Wolfgang Lechner, Paulina Wesolowska,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
Evaluation of localized region-based segmentation algorithms for CT-based delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy  Mehdi Astaraki, Mara Severgnini,
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy  Nicola S. Russell, Inge.
Radiotherapy dose-distribution to the perirectal fat space (PRS) is related to gastrointestinal control-related complications  S.L. Gulliford, S. Ghose,
Pancreatic tumor motion reduction by use of a custom abdominal corset
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Retrospective assessment of MRI-based volumetric changes of normal tissues in glioma patients following radio(chemo)therapy  Andreas Gommlich, Felix Raschke,
Patient-induced susceptibility effects simulation in magnetic resonance imaging  Josef Axel Lundman, Mikael Bylund, Anders Garpebring, Camilla Thellenberg.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova 
VMAT radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy: The incidental effect of low-dose bath exposure  G. Lazzari, A. Terlizzi,
Resolution of atelectasis during radiochemotherapy of lung cancer with serious implications for further treatment. A case report  Lore Helene Braun, Stefan.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy  Victor Hernandez, Jordi Saez, Marlies Pasler,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Axillary radiotherapy for nodal lymphoma: What CTV expansion is required to account for absence of pre-chemotherapy treatment position FDG PET-CT?  Robin.
Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics features during dose-painted radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer  Sangjune.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Potentials and challenges of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy  Sara Leibfarth, René M. Winter, Heidi Lyng, Daniel Zips, Daniela.
Advantages of intensity modulated proton therapy during hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy  Joshua Stoker, Sujay Vora, Ameet Patel, David.
Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer  Nina Boje.
Simultaneous integrated prophylactic cranial irradiation in sino-nasal cancer  Kenneth Jensen, Maja Bendtsen Sharma, Simon Lenler-Eriksen, Per Friis, Anne.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Characterizing geometrical accuracy in clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision radiation treatment of brain tumours 
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Combined morphologic and metabolic pipeline for Positron emission tomography/computed tomography based radiotherapy response evaluation in locally advanced.
Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging provides additional information as compared to anatomical imaging for decision-making in vestibular schwannoma  M.C.
Feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer  Katrina Woodford, Vanessa Panettieri, Trieumy Tran Le,
Fast 4D cone-beam CT from 60 s acquisitions
Radiotherapy for isolated granulocytic sarcoma: Case report and review of literature  Jose Antonio Dominguez Rullán, Eva Fernández Lizarbe, Belén Capuz,
Central pontine myelinolysis
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
Krzysztof Chełmiński, Wojciech Bulski 
Uncertainty evaluation of image-based tumour control probability models in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using a visual analytic tool  Oscar Casares-Magaz,
The posterior cerebellum, a new organ at risk?
Spinal Cord Infarction Mimicking Angina Pectoris
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact.
Design, fabrication, and validation of patient-specific electron tissue compensators for postmastectomy radiation therapy  Daniel F. Craft, Peter Balter,
Rectal volume variations and estimated rectal dose during 8 weeks of image-guided radical 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer 
Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a potential tool to assess and guide salivary gland irradiation 
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Peter de Boer, Stefano Mandija, Anita M
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy
Surface doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer  Jan Seppälä, Aleksi Voutilainen,
R. Botman, S. U. Tetar, M. A. Palacios, B. J. Slotman, F. J
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
Evaluation of plan adaptation strategies for stereotactic radiotherapy of lymph node oligometastases using online magnetic resonance image guidance  Dennis.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Systematic review of methodology used in clinical studies evaluating the benefits of proton beam therapy  Mercy Ofuya, Lucy McParland, Louise Murray,
Presentation transcript:

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Evaluating the repeatability and set-up sensitivity of a large field of view distortion phantom and software for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy  Jonathan Wyatt, Stephen Hedley, Emily Johnstone, Richard Speight, Charles Kelly, Ann Henry, Susan Short, Louise Murray, David Sebag-Montefiore, Hazel McCallum  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 6, Pages 31-38 (April 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.005 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Axial (left) and sagittal (right) planes from MR images of the Spectronic Medical GRADE distortion phantom. The small central markers used to identify the phantom and determine its orientation and position can be seen in the middle of the axial view (red circle). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure caption, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 6, 31-38DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 The mean distortion for each marker as a function of distance from the isocentre for the 2D sequences (top) and 3D sequences (bottom). The results shown are for the repeated set-up. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 6, 31-38DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 The standard deviation of distortion for each marker for the single and repeated set-ups for the 2D sequence. Four outliers for the 3 T PET-MR have been excluded in order to show the rest of the results in more detail. The excluded points were in the range σ=4.5mm to σ=7.5mm. The dotted line marks a standard deviation of distortion of σ=1.0mm, which was equal to the in-plane voxel size for the 2D sequence. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 6, 31-38DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 The standard deviation of distortion for each marker for the single and repeated set-ups for the 3D sequence. One outlier (σ=2.2mm) for the 3 T PET-MR has been excluded in order to show the rest of the results in more detail. The dotted line marks a standard deviation of distortion of σ=1.0mm, equal to the image voxel size. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 6, 31-38DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions