Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Advertisements

Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
by Katriina J. Peltola, Kirsi Paukku, Teija L. T
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Phosphorylation of PML by mitogen-activated protein kinases plays a key role in arsenic trioxide-mediated apoptosis  Fumihiko Hayakawa, Martin L Privalsky 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
MADR1, a MAD-Related Protein That Functions in BMP2 Signaling Pathways
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Stefanie S. Schalm, Diane C. Fingar, David M. Sabatini, John Blenis 
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
Pamela A. Lochhead, Gary Sibbet, Nick Morrice, Vaughn Cleghon  Cell 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
NF-κB1/p105 Regulates Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated MAP Kinase Signaling by Governing the Stability and Function of the Tpl2 Kinase  Michael R. Waterfield,
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 1999)
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 18, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
SARA, a FYVE Domain Protein that Recruits Smad2 to the TGFβ Receptor
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Key functional sites of SPINDLIN1 could be phosphorylated by Aurora-A.
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages 1215-1224 (December 1996) MADR2 Is a Substrate of the TGFβ Receptor and Its Phosphorylation Is Required for Nuclear Accumulation and Signaling  Marina Macías-Silva, Shirin Abdollah, Pamela A Hoodless, Rosa Pirone, Liliana Attisano, Jeffrey L Wrana  Cell  Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages 1215-1224 (December 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6 Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MADR2 Transiently Interacts With the TGFβ Receptor Complex (A) Interaction of MADR2 with TGFβ receptors. COS-1 cells transiently transfected with empty vector (−) or Flag-MADR2, and the indicated combinations of wild-type (WT) or kinase-deficient (KR) TβRI and HA-tagged TβRII were affinity labeled with [125I]TGFβ. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 antibody and receptor complexes visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (α-Flag IP). To confirm equivalent levels of receptor expression, aliquots of total cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (bottom lanes, receptors). (B) MADR2 interaction requires activated TβRI receptor. COS-1 cells transfected with Flag-MADR2 and the indicated receptor constructs were processed as described in (A). Equivalent expression of Flag-MADR2 protein was determined by immunoblotting total cell lysates using anti-Flag M2 antibodies (bottom lane, α-Flag blot). Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MADR2 Is a Substrate of the TGFβ Receptor Complex (A) In vitro phosphorylation of GST-MADR2 by isolated receptor complexes. Nontransfected Mv1Lu or R1B cells were incubated with (+) or without (−) TGFβ (0.5 nM) for 30 min at 37°C. Receptor complexes were isolated by immunoprecipitation using nonspecific serum or anti-TβRII antibody (α-TβRII) as indicated and then were incubated in kinase assay buffer containing [γ-32P]ATP and bacterially expressed MADR2 fusion protein (GST-MADR2) as a substrate. Phosphorylation of GST-MADR2 was visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. (B) In vivo phosphorylation of Flag-MADR2. Mv1Lu cells stably transfected with Flag-MADR2 were incubated with (+) or without (−) TGFβ (1 nM) for 15 min at 37°C. Cells were labeled 2 hr with [32P]phosphate, and Flag-MADR2 was purified by immunoprecipitation with anti-M2 Flag antibody. (C) and (D) Phosphoamino acid analysis and tryptic phosphopeptide mapping of in vivo and in vitro labeled MADR2. The products from partial acid hydrolysis of gel-purified Flag-MADR2 (top panel) or GST-MADR2 (bottom panel), from the indicated lanes in (A) and (B) of Mv1Lu cells, were resolved by two-dimensional electrophoresis in pH 1.9 and pH 3.5 buffers (C). Tryptic digests of the same samples were resolved in two dimensions by electrophoresis in pH 1.9 buffer and chromatography in phosphochromatography buffer (D). The relative migration of the phosphoserine (pS), phosphothreonine (pT), and phosphotyrosine (pY) standards are indicated (C). The relevant phosphopeptides (arrows) and the location of the sample application (+) are marked (D). Mix, mixture of aliquots of in vivo and in vitro labeled MADR2 from Mv1Lu cells (+TGFβ) from (A) and (B). Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The TGFβ Receptor Phosphorylates MADR2 on the C-Terminal Serine Residues (A) Predicted phosphorylation site of MADR2. The amino acid sequence of the carboxy terminus of MADR2 is shown. The predicted tryptic fragments generated from the wild-type (WT) and mutant R462A or R462H MADR2 are indicated (underline bracket). Under the conditions used for phosphopeptide mapping, multiple negative charges (−) are expected from the carboxy terminal fragment. The location of residues mutated in the MADR2 (3S-A) is boxed. (B) Phosphopeptide mapping of wild-type and mutant Flag-MADR2. COS-1 cells, transfected with activated TβRI together with wild-type (WT) or mutant (R462A and R462H) Flag-MADR2, were labeled with [32P]phosphate. Flag-MADR2 was isolated by immunoprecipitation, and tryptic digests of gel-purified MADR2 were resolved in two dimensions as described in Figure 2. The relevant phosphopeptides (arrows) and the location of the sample application (+) are indicated. (C) Phosphopeptide mapping of wild type or a phosphorylation site mutant of MADR2. Mv1Lu cells were incubated with TGFβ (0.5 nM) for 30 min at 37°C, and receptor complexes were isolated by immunoprecipitation with anti-TβRII antibody. Receptors were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay using wild-type GST-MADR2 (WT) or mutant GST-MADR2(3S-A) as substrate. Phosphopeptide mapping was described in (B). (D) In vivo phosphorylation of wild-type and mutant Flag-MADR2. COS-1 cells were transfected with empty vector (−) alone or combinations of wild-type (WT) or activated (*) TβRI together with wild-type (WT) or mutant (3S-A) Flag-MADR2. Cells were labeled with [32P]phosphate, and Flag-MADR2 was purified by immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (32PO4). Equivalent expression of Flag-MADR2 protein was confirmed by immunoblotting (bottom lane, α-Flag blot). Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MADR2 Association and Phosphorylation by the TGFβ Receptor Complex Is Specific (A) Specificity of MADR2 association with the receptor complex. COS-1 cells transfected with Flag-MADR2 or Flag-DPC4 together with TβRII and either wild-type (WT) or kinase-deficient (KR) TβRI were affinity labeled with [125I]TGFβ. Flag-MADR2 and Flag-DPC4 were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 antibody and associated receptors visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (α-Flag IP). To confirm equal receptor expression, aliquots of total cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (middle lane, receptors), and equivalent expression of Flag-MADR2 and Flag-DPC4 protein was confirmed by immunoblotting total cell lysates using an anti-M2 antibody (bottom lane, α-Flag blot). (B) Specificity of GST-MADR2 phosphorylation by the receptor complex. COS-1 cells, transiently transfected with empty vector (−) or with TβRI and HA-tagged TβRII, were incubated with 0.5 nM TGFβ for 30 min at 37°C. Receptor complexes isolated from cell lysates by immunoprecipitation using anti-HA antibodies were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay with GST-MADR2 or GST-DPC4 as a substrate. Phosphorylation of GST-MADR2 and GST-DPC4 was visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The coomassie stained gel indicating the relative level of MADR proteins is shown (bottom lane). Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Phosphorylation of MADR2 by the TGFβ Receptor Requires Activation of Receptor I by Receptor II (A) Phosphorylation of GST-MADR2 in vitro by wild-type and kinase-deficient receptor complexes. COS-1 cells transiently transfected with empty vector (−) or combinations of wild-type (WT) and kinase-deficient (KR) forms of TβRI and HA-tagged TβRII were incubated with 1 nM TGFβ for 15 min at 37°C. Receptor complexes were then isolated from cell lysates by anti-HA immunoprecipitation and subjected to an in vitro kinase assay using GST-MADR2 as a substrate. Phosphorylation was visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (in vitro kinase, top lane). The coomassie stained gel indicating equal levels of GST-MADR2 protein is shown (middle lane). To confirm that similar amounts of receptor complexes were present in the kinase assays, aliquots of transfected cells plated in parallel were affinity labeled with [125I]TGFβ as in Figure 1, and receptors were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody (bottom lane, receptors). The migration of TβRII and TβRI is indicated. (B) Tryptic phosphopeptide mapping of GST-MADR2. Tryptic digests of gel-purified GST-MADR2 from the indicated lanes were resolved in two dimensions and visualized by autoradiography. The relevant phosphopeptides (arrows) and the location of the sample application (+) are indicated. Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Phosphorylation of MADR2 by the TGFβ Receptor Is Required for TGFβ Signaling (A) Effect of wild-type and mutant MADR2 on TGFβ-inducible gene expression. HepG2 cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux alone or with wild-type (WT) and mutant (3S-A) Flag-MADR2 as indicated. In some samples, 10-fold less MADR2(3S-A) DNA was used (0.1). Cells were incubated overnight in the absence (open bars) or presence (closed bars) of 50 pM TGFβ; the relative luciferase activity was measured in cell lysates. (B) Interaction of wild-type and mutant Flag-MADR2 with the TGFβ receptors. COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated expression constructs, affinity labeled with [125I]TGFβ, and cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 antibody (α-Flag IP). To confirm equivalent levels of receptor expression, aliquots of total cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (middle lane, receptors), and expression of Flag-MADR2 protein was determined by immunoblotting of total cell lysates (bottom lane, α-Flag blot). Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Phosphorylation of MADR2 Is Required for TGFβ-Dependent Nuclear Accumulation HepG2 cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant (3S-A) Flag-MADR2 alone or together with activated TβRI (TβRI*). Flag-MADR2 protein was localized in the cells by immunoflorescence using anti-Flag M2 antibody and a FITC-conjugated secondary antibody and analyzed by confocal microscopy. In the presence of the activated TβRI receptor, wild-type MADR2 displays prominant nuclear staining, whereas the phosphorylation site mutant (3S-A) displays a diffuse staining pattern. Cell 1996 87, 1215-1224DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81817-6) Copyright © 1996 Cell Press Terms and Conditions