Multi - Agency Planning Framework Intelligence Community Labor Unions SLSDC Trade Comm. USPS Civil Air Patrol State Agencies USN Forest Service SSA USAF Port Auth. Carriers Nat. Guard DOL FSIS USDA TMO DOD CDC Public Health DLA USACE FDA NIST NRC Int’l Orgs. Multi - Agency Planning Framework Ken Hoffman Tom Pawlowski June 3, 2004 v1.1 BIS FCC Foreign Authorities DOE NOAA DOS FMCSA NMFS Embassies& Consulates DOC FAA NHTSA FRA USMS Courts DOT MARAD FEMA DOJ USSS BOP FinCEN OFAC RSPA FBI Legend/DHS Activity DOI EOIR ATF DEA Bureau of Customs & Border Protection IRS BLM Intelligence Community FWS US Coast Guard EPIC Other US Law Enforcement Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement EPA NPS Transportation Security Administration Bureau of Immigration and Citizenship Services

Problem The Multi-Agency Environment Deals with emerging national problems of high priority Security of international trade, passenger, and financial flows Health coverage and care Joint missions Is more complex with very high risk Requires continuous interaction and coordination across agencies Mission activities, organizations, strategies, processes, information, systems, applications, and data Architectures of participating agencies vary in detail and structure Opportunity: Enterprise Architectures (EA) are seriously underutilized; How can they be used to support Multi-Agency Planning and Analysis?

Approach Focus on Mission Operations with Distinct Patterns Repetitive services, Ad hoc proactive & responsive,..... Apply Activity-Based methods to mission/business definition Relate Managed Services and Components to business Activities Mission-Centric Architecture Integrates segments of Agency/Bureau Architectures Defines necessary content of Agency/Bureau Architectures Supports and empowers OMB-FEA Reference Models Provides Web Services for planning & analysis XML access to sources, HLA integration of Activity models Executable Architecture for Performance Analysis Couple Architecture with Dynamic Simulation of Mission/Business Operations Do architectures have sufficient information for modeling? Readiness Model Supplements GAO EA Criteria with Interoperability measures Addresses Organizational, Services, Data, and infrastructure levels

End-to-End Activities; Cargo & Passengers Repetitive Mission End-to-End Activities; Cargo & Passengers Track Passengers and Cargo and relate to Money flows Multi-Agency Program Office Command and Control Center (e.g., CEE) Board Aircraft CAPPS Inspect Cargo: CBP Issue Visa: State DHS/OIE Depart Re-enter CBP Track: Aircraft Container Ships VLCC Identify Carriers FAA, USCG Mission Activities Support Activities Financial Services HR Payroll Facilities Services IT Services Supply Chain Services Traffic Event Police FBI DHS Other Register at School Target & Inspect CBP Added Descriptors Routine Clearance 747 Entry Activity Model Linked Activity Models for End-to-End Performance Analysis

Ad Hoc Mission – Vigilant Sentry Agencies: USCG CBP HHS/CDC Army NG State of FL

Mission-Centric Architecture Integrates critical features of participating agency/Bureau architectures Supports a Multi-Agency Mission Program Office (or equivalent) Mission-Centric Architecture Mission Activities Services Data Technology Mission Program Office Manages mission activities with strong accountability (Performance Management) Integrates support functions - Business Services (e.g., HR and Financial) - IT Infrastructure and Services Extract Mission-Centric Architecture Details Identify Gaps - Activities - Services & Comp. - Data - Infrastructure Applies to management of: Operations Planning Modernization Agency/Bureau Architectures Agency/Bureau Responsibilities Manage assigned activities Provide support functions & Managed Services Modernization projects Agency/Bureau Responsibilities Manage assigned activities Provide support functions & Managed Services Modernization projects Agency/Bureau Responsibilities Manage assigned activities Provide support functions & Managed Services Modernization projects Activities Services Data Technology Activities Services Data Technology Activities Services Data Technology Governance Model Employ Reference Models Concentrate mission control in Multi-Agency environment Provide virtualized support services by participating agencies

Planner’s Workbench

Findings to Date Enterprise Architectures can be a valuable resource for planning The “Genomic Code of the Enterprise” The Multi-Agency Modernization environment adds significant complexities Requires more specific detail in Architectures and much more precise and uniform definitions of: Activities; mission and support Business Services (e.g. Managed Services, e-gov) Information Services (e.g. Web Services) Requires strong analytic capabilities Dynamic executable capabilities greatly expand the role of Enterprise Architectures Beyond CPIC, to Strategic Planning, Operations Planning, COOP, and Performance Management If the Architecture is of no help in modeling mission performance, it is unlikely to support the real thing!