Quality in VNFIL Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning – Opportunities for Special Target Groups 28.11.- 1.12.2017, Kuopio, Finland Anni Karttunen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employability and Employer Engagement
Advertisements

Lifelong Guidance: A Key to Lifelong Learning – EU Policy Perspective John McCarthy European Commission DG EAC Vocational Training Policy Unit.
Qualifications Update: Sciences Qualifications Update: Sciences.
Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR) CANADA Canadian Information Centre for International Credentials (CICIC) at the Council of Ministers of.
The Accreditation of e-learning Materials Application process and criteria.
The Nordic Quality tool Contexts and applications VPL Biennale, Rotterdam Anni Karttunen Expert in European Eduational Policy
European Inventory on Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning 2010 Jo Hawley, Project Manager Brussels, 12 December 2011.
General Update. New Quality Assurance arrangements Will cover new National 1 to National 5 from 2013/14 New arrangements will promote shared understanding.
Recognition of Prior Learning - issues in quality assurance - experiences of the HvA University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam Lucie te Lintelo RPL Centre.
Validation of non formal and informal learning – the case of Portugal Glasgow, 17 May 2012 Elsa Caramujo National Agency for Qualification and Vocational.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
TORINO PROCESS. TORINO PROCESS 2014 THE TORINO PROCESS 2 THE TORINO PROCESS IS a participatory process leading to an evidence-based analysis of VET policies.
Association for the Education of Adults EAEA Validation and recognition of non-formal and informal learning Eeva-Inkeri Sirelius CONFINTEA.
Building competences for the European labour market: Towards a European Qualifications Framework New Dehli 28 November 2006 Jens Bjornavold European centre.
Quality issues in Validation in the Nordic countries and competence development of employees/staff involved in RPL Antra Carlsen Nordic Network for Adult.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
Recognition of prior learning: report Micheline Scheys Bologna-Seminar, Amsterdam, december 2008.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
Qualified EUCEBS Assessors Award, 8th AE Colloquium, Ljubljana, 22 – 23 October 2004/ Ester Možina Andragoški center Slovenije QUALIFIED EUCEBS ASSESSORS.
1 Validation of non-formal and informal learning in Europe The challenging move from policy to practise Jens Bjornavold Rotterdam, 10 April 2014.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
Diploma and Advanced Diploma in Applications of ICT in Libraries Professional Development Awards Certification for People’s Network ICT Training.
Glasgow, 17 May 2012 Mike Coles Developments in the validation of learning in the EU.
Presentation to the BANKSETA Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) with a Focus on RPL in the Workplace Carmel Marock and Candice Harrison-Train 14 March.
Validation of non-formal and informal learning in Norway - experiences and challenges.
Competence-based Assessment and Certification of HR Professionals “HR WEB COMPASS” Vision and Main Objectives Elmira Bancheva, Ph.D.
Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
MODULE 3 SELF STUDY: TRACKING AND SUPPORT. Lifelong process whereby individuals acquire attitudes, values, skills and knowledge from daily experience.
‘Education has for its purpose not the imparting of particular knowledge but the strengthening of mental faculties’ (Kant c1770)
José Antonio Ivars Sánchez Responsible for Training and Employment Professor at the University of Granada VALEW- to VAlidate Learning at Work.
TAIEX Multi-Beneficiary Workshop on Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning Country presentation Albania Prepared by: Ejvis Gishti - NAVETQ Albina.
Making the AzQF compatible to the EQF, what does it mean? Olav Aarna Estonian Qualifications Authority, Kutsekoda.
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
Adults in Higher Education
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Module V Creating awareness on validation of the acquired competences
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Development of qualifications system in Ukraine:
External Verification Report 2014/15
Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training in Kosovo
Validation: The Dutch Experience
Recognition of prior learning: report
Purpose of referencing
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Validation of Non Formal and Informal Learning
Implementing NQF: developing high quality qualifications
European frameworks for VET VLOR Brussels, 4 June 2014
Recognition of prior learning: report
Designing Assessment Things to be considered:
Validation of non-formal and informal learning
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Validation of Informal and Non- Formal Learning (VINFL) in Malta
Raimo Vuorinen Senior Researcher, Ph.D.
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Quality in VNFIL Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning – Opportunities for Special Target Groups , Kuopio, Finland Anni Karttunen.
- Opportunities for Special Target Groups
Assessment Methods.
QUALIFIED EUCEBS ASSESSORS AWARD (QEAA)
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
PERCENTILE. PERCENTILE What is percentile? Percentile (or Centile) the value of a variable below which a certain percent of observations fall.
Leuven Policy implementation.
Lifelong Learning and Validation Procedures
Validation of non-formal and informal learning outcomes in Norway
Key Competencies of Finnish VET Teachers
ECVET The European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training: principles, application & outlook Monika Auzinger, 3s on behalf.
Presentation transcript:

Quality in VNFIL Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning – Opportunities for Special Target Groups 28.11.- 1.12.2017, Kuopio, Finland Anni Karttunen Programme Manager / Adult Learning Finnish National Board of Education - FINEDU

General notions on quality QUALITY in VNFIL General notions on quality Quality is a very broad concept and difficult to define => rather: quality assurance mechanisms in the validation process Validation occurs in different kinds of contexts => quality assurance mechanisms should be tailored to fit the purpose (cf. formal, non-formal, informal contexts) 2

General continues Quality assurance is sometimes considered a threat to the flexibility of validation process OR it is seen as sufficient if the formal education system has a general quality system in place. The ultimate purpose of quality assurance in validation is to GUIDE the system and assure the INDIVIDUAL an equal, transparent and reliable process. The individual has to be in the centre of the validation process! Competences can only be made visible through a high quality validation process => high market value 3

Eight steps towards QA in VNFIL

Information Information -phase should address questions such as why, how, for whom and where and when. All target groups should have equal understanding of the procedure and the standards. Information should also be accessible through various media, like the internet, intranet and brochures. 5

Preconditions Regulatory framework Funding mechanisms Co-operation structures between stakeholders Descriptions of qualification requirements Assessment criteria and standards (learning outcomes) Attitudes 6

Documention – admin procedures Organic Documention – admin procedures Proper documentation system of the VNIL procedures with each individual promotes transparency, supports the individual rights and enhances a systemic approach to VNIL procedures. VNIL documentation could be compared with organic farming: the entire production trail has to be able to be tracked and traced down. A proper documentation system must be in place and each step of the validation process has to be duly documented: guidance discussions agreements progress plans and timeframes assessment results certification 7

Co-ordination The task of co-ordination / co-ordinator is to: monitor the VNFIL procedures train/help VNFIL practitioners Support / guide VNFIL professionals co-ordinate the development of VNFIL procedures help in forming communities of practice help in forming networks of VNFIL professionals 8

Guidance 9 Guidance provides the VNIL scene: What are the benefits of VNIL for the individual? How does the VNIL work? What are the rights and responsibilities of the individual? What are the assessment criteria like? How does the administrative documentation work? What kind of certification is available? What other possible outcomes there are for the individual? How to use the validation results? What type of further learning paths are available? 9

Mapping – making competences visible Mapping is about building the roadmap for the future. Mapping makes it easier to determine what is the most suitable qualification for the candidate, what level and width of competences does the individual have in order to plan a development path. There should be different kinds of methods for mapping and documenting the individual’s competences. Collection of documentation such as prior certificates or employment references Pictures Portfolios Other descriptions of competences 10

Assessment The assessment results in VNIL should have a legal status Assessment should be reliable Assessors should be competent in VNIL procedures, assessment methodology and the field that they are assessing There should be a number of assessment methods available and a combination of methods should be used Criteria should be unambiguous and clear Assessors need to have clear understanding of the interpretation of the assessment criteria. 11

Follow-up After the assessment procedure, the individual has a right to have feed-back of the assessment results and the possible consequences: Does the result of the assessment possibly shorten the study time? What are the future options in terms of education and work? What if the result of the assessment was negative and the individual does not agree with the result? Is there an appeals procedure in place? Is there guidance available also after the assessment procedure? 12

Let’s keep the VNFIL train moving!!!