Descartes -- Meditations Three

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Advertisements

Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Descartes God.
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Descartes on scepticism
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy March 25 th Chapter Five, ‘God’
Epistemology Revision
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
In sum, 3 Arguments for God’s Existence are used by Descartes in Meditations: 1. The argument for the existence of God from the fact that I have an idea.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
1 The Rationalists: Descartes The Material World Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana Jack Nichols, Living in the material world.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
1/9/2016 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant II Charles Manekin.
Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes II. First Argument for the Existence of God (P1)There must be at least as much reality and perfection in a cause as in its effect. (P2)If an.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Meditation Six Of God: That He Exists.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Concept Innatism.
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Modern Philosophy PHIL320
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Descartes -- Meditations Two
Dualism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Descartes
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Quiz 1 At the beginning of the Second Meditation, what statement is it that Descartes knows to be necessarily true (or at least necessarily true whenever.
¶1 - Review Ignore/reject the senses. Knowledge of myself:
¶1 – Intro “I have seen what to do and what to avoid in order to reach the truth” Namely, separate what’s clear from what’s obscure, trust my clear and.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Presentation transcript:

Descartes -- Meditations Three Charles Manekin 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Topics of Discussion The Hypothesis of the “Truth Rule” – Whatever I perceive very clearly and distinctly is true. Division of Thoughts (Mental Acts) into Two Categories, Ideas and Volitions Distinction between Formal and Objective Reality. Proofs for the Existence of God The Proof of the Truth Rule 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

The Hypothesis of the Truth Rule I am certain that I am a thinking thing. I know this because I clearly and distinctly perceive it to be true. Hypothesis: Whatever I perceive clearly and distinctly is true. (“Truth Rule”) To remove the slightest doubt concerning TR I must prove a) that there is a God and b) that He is no deceiver. 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Division of Thoughts into Two Categories, Ideas and Volitions Images of things, e.g., sun, book. Volitions, emotions, judgments Ideas plus something else Claim: Ideas in themselves cannot be mistaken. Resemblance theory of ideas – my concept of the sun resembles it better than my sense-perception 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Where Does This Distinction Come From? Aristotelian tradition of ideas and judgments. The judge model. Ideas as passive, judgments as active. 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Formal Reality vs. Objective Reality A thing’s formal reality is what sort of thing it is A thing’s objective reality is what sort of content it contains. Examples? My idea of Pizza. What is its formal reality and what is its objective reality? 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Sum res cogitans How does Descartes get to this conclusion? Begins with what “philosophy” then with what “common experience” teaches what he is. I know what I am through introspection Introspection of the unity of the self and its attributes “The fact that it is I who is doubting and understanding and willing is so evident that I see no way of making it clearer.” 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Subtle Inference I think (doubt, will, etc.) Thought is a property essential to me. Thought is the only property essential to me. Hence, I am essentially a thinking thing and not essentially material. 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Intuitive Presentation of First Proof Ideas can be ranked according to their objective reality. The cause of a thing must have as least as much formal reality as its effect. The idea of God = a substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, omnipotent, etc. There must be a cause of this idea, and it cannot be me. Therefore, God exists 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Formal Presentation Part One A cause must precontain the reality of its effect (premiss). There are degrees of reality (premiss). Something cannot come from nothing (from step 1). A cause must contain at least as much reality as its effect (from steps 1 and 2). Everything must have a cause (from step 3). The objective reality of an idea must have a cause (from step 5) This cause must be the formal reality of something (premiss). 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Formal Presentation – Part Two The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as the idea contains objective reality (from steps 4, 6, and 7). Only a perfect God has as much formal reality as my idea of God contains objective reality (premiss). The cause of my idea of God is a perfect God (from steps 8 and 9). A perfect God exists (from step 10). 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Proving the Truth Rule To deceive is an imperfection (premiss). God is not a deceiver (from steps 11 and 12). If my clear and distinct perceptions could be false, then God would be a deceiver (premiss). My clear and distinct perceptions cannot be false; that is, whatever I clearly and distinctly perceive is true (from steps 13 and 14). 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Objections (You tell me some) 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Second Proof of the Existence of God What is the cause of my existence? Could it be me? Nah Could it be my parents? Yes and no. What can cause and preserve something that possesses an idea of God? 1/10/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320