Mott DAQ Timing R. Suleiman February 12, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

Trigger, DAQ, calibration Robert Sulej, październik 2007.
MICE Tracker Front End Progress Tracker Data Readout Basics Progress in Increasing Fraction of Muons Tracker Can Record Determination of Recordable Muons.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
1.Status update from May 2011  FADC250 and Trigger modules  Two crate testing success 2.Schedule  How about those requirements?  What’s happened since.
Mott DAQ Speed December 18, How to speedup DAQ I.Reject low-energy electrons before reaching DAQ: 1.Increase E-detector hardware threshold 2.Vetoing.
Time stamping with CAEN V1290N Bled, 26 th – 28 th March 2008 Dušan Ponikvar, Dejan Paradiž Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Ljubljana, Slovenia.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
 Brief status update of DAQ/Trigger production hardware  Firmware development for HPS application  CLAS12 CTP ‘upgrade’ notes  Summary Status of the.
MICE CM18 June 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Status o Since CM17 o Detector DAQ software o Front End Electronics o Schedule Milestones.
The GANDALF Multi-Channel Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC)  GANDALF module  TDC concepts  TDC implementation in the FPGA  measurements.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
DAQ Map of Electronic Components L. Adeyemi, A. Camsonne, E. Fanchini, JS. Real, R. Suleiman, E. Voutier May 24, 2012.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group November 10, 2008.
Mircea Bogdan, NSS2005 Oct , 2005 – Windham El Conquistador Resort, Puerto Rico1 Simultaneous Sampling ADC Data Acquisition System for the QUIET.
K.C.RAVINDRAN,GRAPES-3 EXPERIMENT,OOTY 1 Development of fast electronics for the GRAPES-3 experiment at Ooty K.C. RAVINDRAN On Behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM24 o Trigger o Event Building o Online Software o Front End.
Updates on Using CAEN 1495 as MLU in Trigger Compton DAQ Performance at 440 kHz HV Status R. Michaels, Nov 19, 2013 p. 1 / 5.
S-2S memo WC Toshiyuki Gogami 24Apr2015.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
Testing of Latch-TDC Da-Shung Su Jia-Ye Chen, Hsi-Hung Yao, Su-Yin Wang, Ting-Hua Chang, Wen-Chen Chang 2011/07/13.
APS-2 Single Pixel Test 7 February 2008 V. Suntharalingam  The Pattern file to capture data from a 256x256 array was modified to address only one pixel.
5 MeV Mott Polarimeter Progress Riad Suleiman April 10, 2012.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
12GeV Trigger Workshop Christopher Newport University 8 July 2009 R. Chris Cuevas Welcome! Workshop goals: 1.Review  Trigger requirements  Present hardware.
TELL1 high rate Birmingham Karim Massri University of Birmingham CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN – 26/03/2012.
MOLLER DAQ Aug 2015 meeting Team : R. Michaels, P. M. King, M. Gericke, K. Kumar R. Michaels, MOLLER Meeting, Aug, 2015.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group September 2008.
DEPT OF MODERN PHYSICS, USTC Electronics System of MC IHEP, Beijing ___________________________________________ Muon Group, USTC, Hefei.
DAQ Map of Electronic Components R. Suleiman February 12,
AMY Meeting. 21 Mar 2011 what is new? Auger Lecce Meeting,
SoLiD/PVDIS DAQ Alexandre Camsonne. DAQ limitations Electronics Data transfer.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
Methods to reduce dead time and achieve higher trigger rate. Sparsification Event blocking Parallel DAQ systems SFI Sequencing.
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
DAQ deadtime memo Kaz, Grass 2012/01/04 1. Current dead time Dead time measured on 2011/09/29  With TDCmax=4, Deadtime =350 us  With TDCmax=8, Deadtime.
APEX DAQ rate capability April 19 th 2015 Alexandre Camsonne.
Ba A B B1 FADC B2 SD_FP FLEX_I/O ROC VME64x A: [ HELICITY, HELICITY_FLIP ] (NIM or ECL) Port 1 Port 2 a: [ HELICITY, HELICITY_FLIP ] (LVDS) B: [ HELICITY_TRIGGER,
Re-designing the Helicity Board Riad Suleiman Injector Group March 19, 2009.
Level-1 Trigger Commissioning Status A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 10, 2010.
CBM-TOF-FEE Jochen Frühauf, GSI Picosecond-TDC-Meeting.
Hall–D Level-1 Trigger Commissioning Part II A.Somov, H.Dong Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Trigger Workshop, July 8, 2010  Play Back Test Vector in Hall-D commissioning.
DAQ Speed and Run2 Estimates April 3, Summary of FADC Development for Faster Performance NameReadoutTrigger ScalersScaler S1 (helicity gated), S2.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
9530 T IMING C ONTROL U NIT Features TCU-1 Key Features 250ps timing resolution with < 50ps jitter 8 independent outputs with full individual programming.
Configuration and local monitoring
"North American" Electronics
DCH FEE STATUS Level 1 Triggered Data Flow FEE Implementation &
Counting Mode DAQ for Compton
MoNA detector physics How to detect neutrons. Thomas Baumann NSCL.
TTC signals: Global Trigger and Global Muon Trigger
LNF - Beam Test Facility Apr. 28 – May 03
PADME L0 Trigger Processor
Ongoing R&D in Orsay/Saclay on ps time measurement: a USB-powered 2-channel 3.2GS/s 12-bit digitizer D.Breton (LAL Orsay), E.Delagnes (CEA/IRFU) Séminaire.
QUARTIC TDC Development at Univ. of Alberta
Muon Recording Studies and Progress for the MICE Tracker
JLAB Front-end and Trigger Electronics
Online DAQ Code Tutorial
Mott DAQ Speed February 16, 2015.
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
JParc-K DAQ System Mircea Bogdan December 9-10, 2006.
Polarized Source Development Run Results
The New Trigger/GPS Module for the EEE Project
Helicity Magnets’ Control Upgrade
HallD Collaboration Meeting Jefferson Lab December 11-13, 2003
A new Trigger/GPS Unit for the EEE Project
Synchronization and trigger management
ASD-TDC joint test with MDT-CSM
Presentation transcript:

Mott DAQ Timing R. Suleiman February 12, 2014

Helicity Signals Timing T_Settle starts 1.0 µs earlier than all other helicity signals T_Settle Pair -Sync Pattern-Sync Delayed Helicity ΔT(nT_Settle - PairSync) = 0.94 µs ΔT(nT_Settle - PatSync) = 1.1 µs ΔT(nT_Settle - Delayed Hel) = 0.95 µs

Scalers / FADC_Int nT_Settle 70 µs FADC Integration Window nT_Settle S1 GATE nT_Settle S1 LNE nT_Settle 180 ns TID Trigger nT_Settle 428 ns

Mott Signals TID Trigger Mott DetTr TDC Mott DetTr 0.322 µs Jitter 16 ns TDC – COMM START L1A 33 ns 216 ns FADC TRG IN L1A

TOT Busy (µs) Mode Channels Busy Delays All the measurements were done using the configuration (or control readout list “crl”) files used during the data taking. TOT Busy (µs) Mode Channels 47.6 – 52.4 FADC Int At 30 and 960 Hz 214 Mott Sample

Busy Delays The evaluation of the busy signal for each single piece was done starting from the configuration files used during the data taking. To evaluate each contribution all the other boards were removed from “trigger” session of the crl file. ONLY the correspondent board was read. Busy (us) Module Mode 106 FADC Mott Sample 16 channels and 500 samples 83 16 channels and 148 samples 25 – 26 FADC_Int 16 channels 14.8 – 17.4 TDC 31 – 32 Scalers (S1+S2) Both boards together 11.8 – 13.2 Scaler S1 Only Scaler S1 8.8 – 9.9 All environment NO readout of any board

S1 LNE = nT_Settle delayed 180 ns 70 µs Delays & Signals Signal Delay Width Jitter S1 LNE = nT_Settle delayed 180 ns 70 µs TID Trigger = nT_Settle delayed 428 ns TDC Mott Detector Trigger 322 ns L1A – Detector Trigger 216 ns 33 ns 16 ns 121 kHz Clock 8.16 µs Signal Amplitude Width TTL detector signals in S2 +5 V 20 ns NIM detector signals in S1 -0.7 V