Check of filamentation time with octupoles on and damper off

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEAM STABILITY IN SYNCHROTRONS WITH DIGITAL TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEMS IN DEPENDENCE ON BEAM TUNES V.M. Zhabitsky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research.
Advertisements

MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.) DayTimeMDEiCMP Tue06: GeV  4 TeV: Ramp for chromaticity - missed A 08:00Ramp down 10: GeV: Large.
Elias Métral, 1st ICE meeting, 14/07/2010 /191 STATUS OF THE LHC INSTABILITIES E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
:00: Prepared new fill B1: Q X =0.293, Q Y =0.269; lifetime = 25h ✔ B2: Q X =0.297, Q Y =0.267; lifetime = 5h ✗ Strong 50Hz and 100hz lines.
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
Beam-Beam and e-Cloud in RHIC Oct. 6, 2015 Haixin Huang, Xiaofeng Gu, Yun Luo.
Wolfgang Hofle AB/RF LHC MAC - June 15, Abort gap cleaning with damper 1/23 Acknowledgements: T. Kramer (AB/BT), E. Shaposhnikova (AB/RF) Wolfgang.
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Interplay of transverse damper and crab cavities W. Hofle BE/RF/FB W. Hofle, 4th Crab Cavity Workshop16-Dec-10 Acknowledgements: RF group, G. Arduini,
ADT Tune Measurement F. Dubouchet, W. Hofle, D. Valuch Acknowledgement: R. Calaga, F. Roncarolo, E. Bravin, shift crews New developments and tests on August.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Shortened program (2 days), as decided in LMC. MD program worked very well  all MD’s on plan with ~foreseen beam time. LHC in very good shape with excellent.
Tuesday 24 th July - morning 10:15 Operator dump of fill 2873  Initial luminosity: 5.83e33 cm-2s-1  12 hours stable beams  151 pb-1 delivered  Initial.
LHC transverse Damper Observations versus expectations W. Hofle BE/RF/FB CERN BE-RF team for ADT L. Arnaudon, P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, G. Cipolla,
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
ADT kickers and amplifiers in tunnel point 4 of LHC, RB44 and RB46 1 W. Hofle LHC Transverse Damper LARP CM20 Napa April 8-10, 2013 LHC Transverse Damper.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Transverse Stability Simulations with Linear Coupling in PyHEADTAIL X. Buffat, L. R. Carver, S. Fartoukh, K. Li, E. Métral, T. Persson, B. Salvant, M.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
W. Hofle / March 5, 2008 Extended LTC meeting 1/22 Acknowledgements: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, E. Ciapala, B. Goddard, A. Koschik, F. Killing, G.
Tuesday 7 th August - morning 07:10 Reinjection after loss of fill 2920 to UFO near ALICE  26 pb -1 in 1h16m; peak lumi 6.4e33 cm -2 s -1 08:10 dump at.
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
Transverse Damping Requirements
Space charge studies at the SPS
LEIR IMPEDANCE AND INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Update on single-collimator impedance measurements using ADT data
Wire, flat beams and beam-beam MDs in 2017
Proposals for 2015 impedance-related MD requests for PSB and SPS
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Monday :00 Stable beams 9_6_6_6 13:40 Access.
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
MD2490 Measurement of the TMCI threshold at flat-top
Gear Changing Issues for MEIC: Outline
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
Wed :55 Fill 2653 stable beams 1.40e11 ppb, cm-2s-1peak lumi, 11.6 pb-1 total lumi delivered. 09:31 Dumped by collimator interlock:
MD2490: Measurement of the TMCI Threshold at Flat-Top
Tuesday Nov 16th Fill 1492 into physics around 07.30
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
LHC summary week 32 Coordination: Mike Lamont & Jan Uythoven
Saturday 09:40 Stable beams #1369 (56 bunch scheme)
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
Thursday morning – optics correction
Weekend: Sat 11th – Mon 13th Reasonably smooth running Saturday:
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
MD#4 Progress MD Coordinators: Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Limits on damping times
Wednesday 8th August & night
Tuesday 9th November 10:02 Fill beams dumped
W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant
(on behalf of the LHC team)
Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
STABILISING INTENSE BEAMS
Thursday – Morning Energy matching at injection with H CODs
Thursday 30th September De-bunching test
Wednesday h18: 228b fill lost just before start of ramp.
Another Immortal Fill….
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

Check of filamentation time with octupoles on and damper off motivation: desire to use octupoles @450 GeV to provide more Landau damping in transverse planes  requires check of effectiveness of damper in presence of octupoles without damper: “filamentation” of injection error (from simulation / theory) m=10-4, Q’=2, (Dp/p)rms=0.44x10-3 G. Kotzian, W. Hofle, E. Vogel, EPAC 2008 G.M. Minty, SLAC-PUB-95-6815 (1995)  speed at which filamentation happens depends on amplitude de-tuning (octupoles)

Reminder: Emittance increase by filamentation without damper a steering / kick error of Dx in position and Dx’ in angle will lead to a relative emittance increase of Introducing the effective (overall) damping rate simplified (because not all processes follow exp. law) also only valid for small injection errors where tdec de-coherence time in absence of instability and active damping tinst instability rise-time tad active damping time as it would follow from damper gain without having any instability and without de-coherence phenomena and assuming tdec >> tinst > tad the emittance increase becomes blow-up reduction factor typically tdec > 10 x tad hence emittance increase reduced by factor >100 ! W. Hofle / March 5, 2008 Extended LTC meeting

Example from 2010 with pilot Damper off Beam 1: Transverse injection transient, pilot, Thursday, 10.06.2010, 13:12 H Q7, no dispersion H Q9, dispersion, 1.1 m high chromaticity high chromaticity V Q7 V Q9 low chromaticity low chromaticity W. Hofle, ADT @ Evain

Test with ocupoles @450 GeV on 09.06.2011, Fill #1861 take INDIV beam at nominal intensity emittances: ranged from 1.5 to 2.5 mm check filamentation without damper, with octupoles on and off method: disable damper for first 2000 turns octupole polarities: positive for de-focusing, negative for focusing additional de-coherence already seen 2010 with high bunch intensity  tune spread associated with space charge (image space charge) 22.04.2010 damper off damper on

Beam 1: test of yesterday damper ON horizontal vertical damper always switched on at turn 2000

Beam 2: test of yesterday damper ON horizontal vertical damper always switched on at turn 2000

Luminosity cost estimate back of the envelop: B2V: de-coherence time change 0 A  6.5 A: 1500 turns  400 turns typical damping by damper: (@high gain) < 20 turns 500 blow-up reduction factor change: 1.84x10-4 2.41x10-3 luminosity cost: 0.06% (0.75 s injection error) 40 turns damping instead of 20 turns  cost: 0.25% 150 turns filamentation instead of 400 turns  cost: 0.4% 1.5 s injection error instead of 0.75 s  cost: 0.25 % 150 turns filamentation, 40 turns active damping 1.5 s injection error  lumi cost 5.5 % ! word of caution: damping not equally fast for all bunches due to effect of injection kicker ripple/rise-time + limited damper bandwidth would need to scan all bunches to quantify experimentally