Coverage vs. Observations

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advertisements

1 Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC) at the German Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), March st, Task Team on WIGOS MetaData (TT-WMD) WMO Headquarters.

Observations, Features, Coverages, SOS Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 9 September 2006.

1 Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC) at the German Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), March st, Task Team on WIGOS MetaData (TT-WMD) WMO Headquarters.

1 SSO 1st Nov, 2011 Applying WCO Ontology to Geospatial Web Coverage Services Xia Wang and Peter Baumann Jacobs University.

Pacific Island Countries GIS/RS User Conference 2010, Suva, November 2010 Sensor Web Enablement for the Pacific Vulnerability and adaptation of coastal.

10 December, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: DPM Meta model CWA1Page 1.

CE 397 Midterm Slides Review Slides for the Midterm Exam David Maidment Spring 2015.

AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Information modelling – standards context Simon Cox.

Managing Service Metadata as Context The 2005 Istanbul International Computational Science & Engineering Conference (ICCSE2005) Mehmet S. Aktas

Representing variables according to the ISO/IEC standard.

Report to ICAO MARIE-PT from WMO TT-AvXML

® The sampled feature of hydrologic observation Hydrology Domain Working Group at the OGC/TC Meeting, Austin, 2012, Mar Irina Dornblut, Global Runoff.

Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,

How do you want that data? Spatial information models and web interfaces Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 7 September 2005.

Information Viewpoints and Geoscience Service Architectures Simon Cox Research Scientist 13 December 2007.

Copyright © 2009, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Time issue : Meteo Domain needs and WMS present means Meteorology DWG Frédéric Guillaud, Marie-Françoise.

OM-JSON Simon Cox | Research Scientist | Environmental Information Infrastructures 21 st September 2015 LAND AND WATER, DATA61 a JSON implementation of.

4.8 Writing Equations from Patterns A very useful problem-solving strategy is look for a pattern. When you make a conclusion based on a pattern of examples,

® Sponsored by Environmental and Observational Data in Urban Planning 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA Katharina Schleidt 2 June 2015.

Managing different views of data Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 29 November 2006.

Guidelines for O&M in INSPIRE. Overview Goals Thematic areas involved Basic O&M design patterns Common elements defined.

Observations & Measurements & SWE in Inspire OGC Hydro DWG Workshop – Reading – Sylvain Grellet Office International de l’Eau.

EXAMPLE 2 Plot points in a coordinate plane

OBOE v.s. OGC O&M SONet June 8,2010. OBOE Entity Context Characteristic Measurement Observation Standard hasCharacteristic hasMeasurement ofEntity hasContext.

® Hosted and Sponsored by Observed Observable Properties - from HY_Features perspective - OGC Hydrology Domain Working Group 3 rd Meeting, Reading, UK,

® Sponsored by OGC TimeseriesML Domain Range Web Service Use Case for The National Weather Service's National Digital Forecast Database 95th OGC Technical.

® Sponsored by SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 90th OGC Technical Committee Washington, DC Michael Utech 26 March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium.

OGC TC Washington – HydroDWG meeting – Inspire O&M & SWE requirements - profile BRGM – S.Grellet 52N – S.Jirka.

Experience Transforming Coverage-data Jordi Escriu.

1 29 Septembre ISN 15.12x Transformation of El - OI data for INSPIRE.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WaterML Presentation to FGDC SWG Nate Booth January 30, 2013.

® OGC Sensor Web Enablement Dr Andrew Woolf STFC e-Science Centre Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.

OGC Hydro DWG Workshop 2016 – Koblenz – Inspire O&M & SWE requirements - profile BRGM – S.Grellet.

The Coordinate Plane What You'll Learn

Updated version of TGs - O&M and SWE for INSPIRE (D2

1-6 Relations Goals: Represent relations as tables, ordered pairs, graphs and mappings. Eligible Content: A / A / A / A

Relations and Functions

Input Space Partition Testing CS 4501 / 6501 Software Testing

MARKETING RESEARCH ? ? ? ? ? ?.

Exponential Functions

Locate Points on a Coordinate Plane

Chapter 3 Graphing.

Experiences with implementing INSPIRE Coverages INSPIRE KEN Workshop

Encoding National OI datasets into INSPIRE specifications

Updates on models exchanges in EPOS

Vocabulary Words Axes - two perpendicular number lines used for locating points Origin – the intersection of the two axes Y-axis – the vertical.

Inspire – MIWP 7a- introduction to Inspire D 2.9

Experiences with implementing INSPIRE Coverages

Objective 1A f(x) = 2x + 3 What is the Range of the function

Scanning the environment: The global perspective on the integration of non-traditional data sources, administrative data and geospatial information Sub-regional.

Warm-Up 4 minutes 1) Given that x = 2, find y where y = 5x + 4.

Unit 3c: Relations and Functions

Exponential Functions

THE COORDINATE PLANE.

2.6 Operations on Functions

“eff” of x Monday, 25 February 2019.

4.1 – Plot Points in a Coordinate Plane

Functions and Graphing

Learning Target: I can determine if a relation is a function.

Relations, Domain and Range

3.5 Operations on Functions

TOP 5d) Floods Directive reporting - INSPIRE progress -

1-6 Relations Goals: Represent relations as tables, ordered pairs, graphs and mappings. Eligible Content: A / A / A / A

Algebra 1 ~ Chapter 4.1 The Coordinate Plane.

Social Practice of the language: Describe and share information

Diagnosis Definition:

Quadratic Functions and Their Properties

Stefan Jensen - head - SEIS and SDI group

უმაღლესი საგანმანათლებლო დაწესებულებების ავტორიზაცია:

Presentation transcript:

Coverage vs. Observations A Question of Perspective

It‘s long and hairy – must be an observation It‘s wide and full of stuff – must be a coverage I think we‘re up against a wall!

Coverage vs Observations Each model is consistent on its own. When they are linked, redundancies pertaining to domain and range occur Each model has deficits: O&M: Non-hierarchical sampling strategies as required for classification or other gridding of the domain Coverage Model: Procedural information, sensor information, the HOW

Basic O&M Observation Domain Range Observation Process Property Domain +featureOfInterest +result ProcessUsed Phenomenon +observedProperty +procedure Process Property

Basic Coverage Domain Range Coverage RangeType Metadata +domainSet +rangeSet +rangeType +metadata RangeType Metadata

Observation w/ Coverage Domain Domain Range Range Observation +featureOfInterest ProcessUsed Phenomenon +observedProperty +procedure Process Property +result Coverage +domainSet +rangeSet +rangeType +metadata RangeType Metadata

Coverage w/ Observation Domain Range Coverage +domainSet +rangeSet +rangeType RangeType +metadata Domain Range Observation +featureOfInterest +result ProcessUsed Phenomenon +observedProperty +procedure Process Property

Bits to be Mapped Cov I CoverageFunction - describes the mapping function from the domain to the range of the coverage Is this generally provided, or devolved to the default axis order and logical sequence within axes? Missing in O&M Envelope Correspondence sampledFeature?

Bits to be Mapped Cov II RangeType dataRecord interpolationRestriction Data Type SWE Common :: DataRecord provided within result in observation interpolationRestriction can‘t currently find in obs

Bits to be Mapped Cov III Metadata – Coverage sometimes utilizes O&M Observation

Bits to be Mapped Obs Observed Property Procedure

What to do?

Kathi Schleidt Kathi@DataCove. eu DataCove e. U Kathi Schleidt Kathi@DataCove.eu DataCove e.U. Robert Hamerling Gasse 1/14 1150 Vienna, Austria