Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Advertisements

Thuy T.M. Ngo, Qiucen Zhang, Ruobo Zhou, Jaya G. Yodh, Taekjip Ha  Cell 
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Context-Dependent Decay of Motor Memories during Skill Acquisition
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013)
Lock and Key to Transcription: σ-DNA Interaction
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Mismatch Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex
Lu Bai, Andrej Ondracka, Frederick R. Cross  Molecular Cell 
DNA Nanomechanics in the Nucleosome
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Kuangyu Yen, Vinesh Vinayachandran, B. Franklin Pugh  Cell 
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Martin Depken, Juan M.R. Parrondo, Stephan W. Grill  Cell Reports 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Multiple Timescales of Memory in Lateral Habenula and Dopamine Neurons
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Srinivas Ramachandran, Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013)
Information Integration and Energy Expenditure in Gene Regulation
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Irina V. Dobrovolskaia, Gaurav Arya  Biophysical Journal 
A Movie of RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (February 2015)
Revisiting the Central Dogma One Molecule at a Time
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Coupled Oscillator Dynamics of Vocal Turn-Taking in Monkeys
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Matthew R. Roesch, Adam R. Taylor, Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Neuron 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Presentation transcript:

Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages 738-749 (November 2012) Nucleosomal Elements that Control the Topography of the Barrier to Transcription  Lacramioara Bintu, Toyotaka Ishibashi, Manchuta Dangkulwanich, Yueh-Yi Wu, Lucyna Lubkowska, Mikhail Kashlev, Carlos Bustamante  Cell  Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages 738-749 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Transcription through Modified Nucleosomes (A–D) (A) (Left) Experimental setup for single-molecule transcription experiments. Two laser beams (red) are used to trap antidigoxigenin (AD) and streptavidin (SA) coated beads. A DNA tether is formed between a Pol II and the upstream DNA. The blue arrow shows the direction of transcription. (Right) Cartoon schematic of the histone-DNA contacts on nucleosome is shown as color coded rectangle. Asterisks are the positions of Sin H4 (cyan) and Sin H3 (purple) mutations. The position of Pol II as a function of time during single-molecule transcription of bare DNA (black) and unmodified nucleosomes (red) (B), tailless (blue) and mock-acetylated (green) nucleosomes (C), and Sin H4 (cyan) and H3 (purple) mutant nucleosomes (D). Traces where Pol II passed the nucleosome positioning sequence (NPS, shaded yellow) are shown on the left and traces that arrested at the nucleosome are on the right. Insets show the percentages of Pol II molecules that transcribed the entire NPS. See also Table S1 and Figure S2. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tails Affect Pausing in the Nucleosome Entry Region (A and C) Pause density as a function the position of the active center of Pol II on the template for tailless and acetylated nucleosomes. The nucleosome entry/exit regions are shaded yellow, and the central region is shaded gray. Error bars represent SEM. (B and D) Pause durations in the entry, central, and exit regions of these nucleosomes. The pause-free velocity of tail-modified nucleosomes is shown in Figure S3. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sin Mutants Destabilized at the Dyad (A and C) Pause density as a function the position of the active center of Pol II on the template for Sin H4 and SinH3 nucleosomes. Error bars represent SEM. (B and D) Pause durations in the entry, central and exit regions of these nucleosomes. The pause-free velocity of Sin mutants is shown in Figure S4. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Nucleosome Dynamics in the Absence of Pol II (A) Experimental setup for single-molecule nucleosome dynamics experiments. The symbols are the same as in Figure 1. (B) Force-extension curves of the nucleosome in 40 mM KCl (left) and 300 mM KCl (right). The pulling curve is in black, and the relaxation one is in blue. The unwrapping events corresponding to outer and inner rips are indicated with arrows. (C) An example of nucleosome transition events between the wrapped state and the unwrapped one. (D) Summary of changes for the nucleosome wrapping and unwrapping rates. For more information about the unwrapping and rewrapping rates of the nucleosome. See also Table S2. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Nucleosome Wrapping Equilibrium during Transcription (A) Kinetic scheme of transcription through the nucleosome. The parameters involved are: the elongation rate (ke), intrinsic diffusion rate of the polymerase during a pause (k0), the barrier to backtracking (ΔG), and the rates of nucleosome unwrapping (ku), and wrapping (kw). The labels of the states indicate the number of base pairs Pol II backtracked and the state of the nucleosome: unwrapped (u) or wrapped (w). (B) Fitted values of local wrapping equilibrium constant of the nucleosome (Kw = kw/ku) for the three regions. (C) Elements that control the wrapping equilibrium for the three regions. (D) Magnitude of the nascent RNA barrier to backtracking in the three regions. Error bars in (B) and (D) represent 95% confidence intervals for the fit of the model parameters to the experimental data. See also Table S3 and Figure S5. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Arrest Probabilities for Modified Nucleosomes, Related to Table 1. Position of terminal arrest as a function of position on the DNA template, as determined from single-molecule trajectories at 300 mM KCl for: (A) bare DNA, and (B) unmodified nucleosome, (C) tailless nucleosome, (D) mock-acetylated nucleosome, (E) Sin H4 nucleosome, (F) Sin H3 nucleosome and (G) nucleosome with RNase A. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Alignment of Traces for Improved Precision, Related to Figure 1 An example trace is shown before (blue) and after (black) alignment. The yellow shading between 3464 and 3611 corresponds to the NPS region. Position 3538 bp corresponds to the nucleosome dyad (position 0 in the main text). All trajectories were aligned such that their start position before the flow of NTPs is equal to the position of the stall site (3131 bp, red arrow). Only traces that transcribed past position 3650 bp were in addition scaled linearly such that the end position of Pol II on DNA corresponds to the expected run-off length (3824 bp, green arrow). The discrepancy between the pre and post-alignment data presented in this figure is the highest we have detected; in general the difference between the end of the trace and the expected run-off is 15-20 bp. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Determination of the Pause-Free Velocity, Related to Figure 2 (A–D) Due to limitations in picking very short pauses, we used a pause-independent algorithm to determine the pause-free velocity. For each condition, we first plotted all instantaneous velocities (slopes of the Savitzky-Golay filtered data, blue); these velocities include pauses. Since we reason that pauses represent a peak of velocities centered at zero, we fit the negative velocities with the left side of a Gaussian distribution with mean zero (Lower Tail Fit; solid yellow line). We extrapolate this distribution to the right (Extrapolated Pause Gaussian; dashed yellow line), and subtract the entire Gaussian from the overall data to obtain the pause-free velocities (green). The mean of the pause-subtracted data is shown in each panel and reported in the main text. The error is the standard error of the mean, and N represents the number of traces for each condition. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Determination of the Pause-Free Velocity in Sin Mutants, Related to Figure 3 (A and B) Due to limitations in picking very short pauses, we used a pause-independent algorithm to determine the pause-free velocity. For each condition, we first plotted all instantaneous velocities (slopes of the Savitzky-Golay filtered data, blue); these velocities include pauses. Since we reason that pauses represent a peak of velocities centered at zero, we fit the negative velocities with the left side of a Gaussian distribution with mean zero (Lower Tail Fit; solid yellow line). We extrapolate this distribution to the right (Extrapolated Pause Gaussian; dashed yellow line), and subtract the entire Gaussian from the overall data to obtain the pause-free velocities (green). The mean of the pause-subtracted data is shown in each panel and reported in the main text. The error is the standard error of the mean, and N represents the number of traces for each condition. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 RNase Addition Affects Pausing, Related to Figure 5 (A) Pause density as a function the position of Pol II’s active center on the template for bare DNA, nucleosome with/without RNase. The nucleosome entry/exit regions are shaded yellow, and the central region is shaded gray. (B) Pause durations in the entry, central and exit regions of the nucleosome. Cell 2012 151, 738-749DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.009) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions