Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Fang Xu, Yu Ti Cheng, Paul Kapos, Yan Huang, Xin Li  Molecular Plant 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
A Truncated Arabidopsis NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1, AtNAP1;3T, Alters Plant Growth Responses to Abscisic Acid and Salt in the Atnap1;3-2 Mutant  Liu.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
The RdDM Pathway Is Required for Basal Heat Tolerance in Arabidopsis
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Liyuan Chen, Anne Bernhardt, JooHyun Lee, Hanjo Hellmann 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
A DTX/MATE-Type Transporter Facilitates Abscisic Acid Efflux and Modulates ABA Sensitivity and Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis  Haiwen Zhang, Huifen.
The WUSCHEL Related Homeobox Protein WOX7 Regulates the Sugar Response of Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana  Danyu Kong, Yueling Hao, Hongchang.
NRGA1, a Putative Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier, Mediates ABA Regulation of Guard Cell Ion Channels and Drought Stress Responses in Arabidopsis  Chun-Long.
SKIP Interacts with the Paf1 Complex to Regulate Flowering via the Activation of FLC Transcription in Arabidopsis  Ying Cao, Liguo Wen, Zheng Wang, Ligeng.
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Kristoffer Palma, Yuelin Zhang, Xin Li  Current Biology 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Marco Trujillo, Kazuya Ichimura, Catarina Casais, Ken Shirasu 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
SWR1 Chromatin-Remodeling Complex Subunits and H2A
Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis  Yulong Wang, Yiqing Wang,
AtPRMT5 Regulates Shoot Regeneration through Mediating Histone H4R3 Dimethylation on KRPs and Pre-mRNA Splicing of RKP in Arabidopsis  Hui Liu, Xu Ma,
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (March 2011)
A miRNA Involved in Phosphate-Starvation Response in Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Xiang Han, Hao Yu, Rongrong Yuan, Yan Yang, Fengying An, Genji Qin
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e4 (January 2019)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
1O2-Mediated and EXECUTER-Dependent Retrograde Plastid-to-Nucleus Signaling in Norflurazon-Treated Seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana  Chanhong Kim, Klaus.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Roles of Defense Hormones in the Regulation of Ozone-Induced Changes in Gene Expression and Cell Death  Enjun Xu, Lauri Vaahtera, Mikael Brosché  Molecular.
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Mitochondrial Sulfide Detoxification Requires a Functional Isoform O- Acetylserine(thiol)lyase C in Arabidopsis thaliana  Consolación Álvarez, Irene García,
DET1 and COP1 Modulate the Coordination of Growth and Immunity in Response to Key Seasonal Signals in Arabidopsis  Sreeramaiah N. Gangappa, S. Vinod Kumar 
Antagonistic Roles for H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in the Cold-Induced Epigenetic Switch at Arabidopsis FLC  Hongchun Yang, Martin Howard, Caroline Dean  Current.
DELLA Proteins Promote Anthocyanin Biosynthesis via Sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ Suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 Complex in Arabidopsis thaliana  Ye Xie,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 1536-1549 (October 2015) Disruption of the Arabidopsis Defense Regulator Genes SAG101, EDS1, and PAD4 Confers Enhanced Freezing Tolerance  Qin-Fang Chen, Le Xu, Wei-Juan Tan, Liang Chen, Hua Qi, Li-Juan Xie, Mo-Xian Chen, Bin-Yi Liu, Lu-Jun Yu, Nan Yao, Jian-Hua Zhang, Wensheng Shu, Shi Xiao  Molecular Plant  Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 1536-1549 (October 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009 Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The sag101, eds1, and pad4 Mutants Show Enhanced Tolerance to Freezing. (A) Images of non-acclimated (NA) wild type (WT), sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 mutants before (CK) and after 1 h treatment at various freezing temperatures (−6, −8, and −10°C), followed by 7-day recovery at normal growth conditions. (B and C) Survival rate (B) and dry weight (C) of NA WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants after freezing treatment (−6, −8, and −10°C) followed by 7-day recovery. (D) Electrolyte leakage of NA WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants after freezing treatment (−3, −4, −5, −6, −7, and −8°C). (E) Images of cold-acclimated (CA) WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants before (CK) and after 1 h treatment at various freezing temperatures (−8, −10, and −12°C), followed by 7-day recovery at normal growth conditions. (F and G), Survival rate (F) and dry weight (G) of CA WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants after freezing treatment (−8, −10, and −12°C) followed by 7-day recovery. (H) Electrolyte leakage of CA WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants after freezing treatment (−7, −8, −9, −10, −11, and −12°C). The experiments have been repeated three times with biological replicates and >15 plants were used for each experiment. Data are average values ± SD (n = 3) calculated from three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences from wild type (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test). Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cold-Responsive Expression of CBFs and Accumulation of Osmolytes in Wild Type, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1. (A) Expression of CBF genes and their regulons in wild type (WT), sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants under cold stress (4°C). Total RNA samples were extracted from 4-week-old WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants treated at 4°C for 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. The transcripts of CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, COR47, RD29A, and KIN1 were analyzed by qRT–PCR. The 2−▵▵Ct method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) was used to calculated the cycle threshold (Ct) value of each sample. The expression level changes of CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, COR47, RD29A, and KIN1 were normalized with ACTIN2. The relative expression of these genes is presented as 2−▵▵Ct. The experiments were repeated (biological replicates) three times, with similar results, and the representative data from one replicate are shown. Data are means ± SD (n = 3) of three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences from wild type (**P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test). (B) Contents of proline and soluble sugars in WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants under NA and CA conditions. WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants were untreated (NA) or cold-treated for 3 days and rosettes were collected for metabolite extraction. Ribitol was added as an internal quantitative standard for GC-MS analysis. The experiments were repeated (biological replicates) three times, with similar results, and the representative data from one replicate are shown. Data are means ± SD calculated from three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences from wild type (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test). Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cell Death and ROS Levels in Wild-Type (WT), sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 Rosettes upon Freezing Treatment. (A) Trypan blue staining showing cell death in the rosettes of WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants. Bars represent 1 mm. (B) DAB staining showing ROS accumulation in the rosettes of WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants. Bars represent 1 mm. Four-week-old WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants were untreated (NA) or cold-acclimated for 3 days (CA) then transferred to −6°C (for NA plants) or −8°C (for CA plants) for 1 h and subsequently recovered for 12 h at 4°C. Rosettes were collected for trypan blue and DAB staining. Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Levels of Free SA and SA Glucosides in the Rosettes of Wild-Type (WT), sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 Plants. Free SA and SA glucosides were extracted from rosettes of 4-week-old WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, pad4-1, and siz1 plants harvested after NA, CA, freezing treatment (−8°C) for 1 h (Freezing) and recovery for 12 h (Recovery), and the extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The experiments were repeated (biological replicates) three times, with similar results, and the representative data from one replicate are shown. Data are means ± SD calculated from three technical replicates. Asterisks with “a” indicate significant differences from that of NA wild type and with “b” indicate significant differences from wild type (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test). Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Lipid Profiles of 4-Week-Old Wild-Type (WT), sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 Rosettes Before (22°C) and After CA Followed by Freezing Treatment (−8°C). (A) Freezing-induced changes in the compositions of phospholipids (PC, PE, PI, PS, and PA) of WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 rosettes before (22°C; left column) and after CA followed by freezing treatment (−8°C; right column). (B and C) Total amounts (signal/mg dry weight) of diacylglycerol (DAG; left column) and triacylglycerol (TAG; right column) in WT, sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 rosettes. The DAG/TAG ratio of each treatment is shown in (C). Data are means ± SD calculated from four technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences from wild type (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test). Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of Supplementation with SA, DAG, and PA on Freezing Sensitivities of sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 Mutants. Four-week-old wild-type (WT), sag101-3, eds1-22, and pad4-1 plants were sprayed with dH2O, 200 μM SA (Sigma-Aldrich), DAG (1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol from Avanti Polar Lipids), and PA (mixture from Sigma-Aldrich) liposomes and incubated under normal growth conditions for 24 h. The plants were subsequently treated with freezing temperature (−8°C) for 1 h followed by 7-day recovery. Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Effect of SA on the Expression of Genes Involved in DAG Metabolism in Wild-Type Plants under Cold (4°C) and Freezing (−8°C) Stresses. Total RNA samples were extracted from 4-week-old wild-type plants treated with dH2O (−SA) or 200 μM SA (+SA) at 4°C for 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 72 h as well as freezing (−8°C) for 1 h (F1) following recovery at 4°C for 6 h (R6). The expression level changes of DGATs (DGAT1, DGAT2, and DGAT3) and DGKs (DGK2, DGK3, and DGK5) were normalized with ACTIN2. The relative expression levels of these genes were presented as 2−▵▵Ct. The experiments were repeated (biological replicates) three times, with similar results, and the representative data from one replicate are shown. Data are means ± SD (n = 3) of three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences of SA treatment from that of dH2O treatment (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test). “a” and “b” indicate decreased and increased, respectively, gene expression levels in the SA-treated samples in comparison with the corresponding dH2O-treated controls. Molecular Plant 2015 8, 1536-1549DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.009) Copyright © 2015 The Author Terms and Conditions