Mid-Tier Acquisition Framework Reference Tool for PMs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ref.: New Acquisition Policy by DAU, 20 May 2003, PMT-352
Advertisements

C.B. Cochrane 1 Jan 2009 The 5000 documents have been issued as a directive, two directives, a directive and an instruction, a directive and a regulation,
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Revised April 19, 2005 Deidre A. Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Office.
MODIFICATION 5/ N N Y PROGRAM TO BE MODIFIED STILL IN PRODUCTION 6/ Y SEPARATE ACQUISITION EFFORT 5/ N TOTAL COST OF MODIFICATION >= MAIS or MDAP 5/, 8/
Lesson Objectives Review Capabilities Development documents and processes for Information Technology and Information Systems IT Box – (current JCIDS manual)
Depot Maintenance & Partnering Provisions of Title 10 December 3, 2004.
AT&L Update Tracking AT&L Initiatives AT&L reorganization
1 May 2009 ver. 5.5 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) MDA: Approves AoA Study Guidance Determines acquisition phase of entry Identifies initial review.
In-sourcing Guidelines and Procedures By Dr. John Anderson. PDASA, FMMR, OASA(M&RA)
Ms. Nancy Dolan CNO N Human Systems Integration in DoD Acquisition.
1 Achieving Total Systems Management (ATSM) Acquisition Strategies to Increase Reliability and Reduce Logistics Footprint PEO/SYSCOM Workshop November.
The Information Technology (IT) Box A Primer
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
0 9 Dec 2009, V1.2 Bradford Brown Director for Acquisition & Program management Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) Implementation of the Weapon Systems.
UNCLASSIFIED March 10, 2011 Rapid Acquisition OSD CAPE Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT Alan Chvotkin Senior Vice President and Counsel Professional Services Council DEFENSE ACQUISITION.
Why is BCL Needed? BCL addresses long-standing challenges that have impacted the delivery of business capabilities The DepSecDef directed increasing the.
US Special Operations Command UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1 Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Support to SOF Warfighters Ms. Leah Treppel Deputy for.
1 APB, SAR, and Nunn-McCurdy Status DAMIR Conference October 30-31, 2007 Larry Axtell & Wendell Irby OUSD(AT&L)
New 5000 Documents 14 May 2001 New 5000 Documents 14 May 2001 Defense Systems Management College Acquisition Policy Department.
Presented at the 2nd Annual DAU-South CONTRACTING CONFERENCE & EXPO
Life Cycle Logistics.
1 1 Nunn-McCurdy Legislation/Program Impacts Della McPhail Chief Financial Officer 308 ARSW DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution.
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense _APBI_JPM_CP 1 STAN ENATSKY JPM-CP Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical.
Chapter 11 Managing Application Development. Agenda Application management framework Application management issues Criteria for development approach Development.
Lecture 2.1b: DoD Acquisition Process (SEF Ch 2)
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Information Requirements
U.S. Department of Defense Foreign Comparative Testing Program How to participate and win?
2.1 ACQUISITION STRATEGYSlide 1 Space System Segments.
UNCLASSIFIED DHS Advanced Personal Protection System (APPS) for Law Enforcement.
Presidential Direction
Lesson Objectives Determine the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone A to Milestone B Explain the purpose.
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Lesson Objectives Determine the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone A to Milestone B Explain the purpose.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities July 12, 2016.
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Life Cycle Logistics.
Competitive Prototyping – the New Reality
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities April 25, 2017.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Urgent Operational Needs – Rapid Acquisition
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Major Events That Shaped Defense Acquisition,
The Information Technology (IT) Box A Primer
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
APB, SAR, and Nunn-McCurdy Status
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Alternate Acquisition
Information Required for Milestone and Decision Reviews
Weapons System Lifecycle Management (WSLM) Information Brief
CARD: Basically must be prepared any time an independent estimate (ICE or CCA) is to be done
CARD: Basically must be prepared any time an independent estimate (ICE or CCA) is to be done
DAU Section 804 Middle Tier Acquisition Discussion
NDAA Section 804 “Middle Tier” Oct 2018.
The Department of Defense Acquisition Process
ADAPTIVE ACQUISITION FRAMEWORK OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT
Information For Government Information For Industry
ADAPTIVE ACQUISITION FRAMEWORK OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT
Policy Update Overview
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Presentation transcript:

Mid-Tier Acquisition Framework Reference Tool for PMs USD (A&S) Middle Tier of Acquisition (Rapid Prototyping/Rapid Fielding) Interim Governance, October 09, 2018 USD (A&S) Middle Tier Acquisition Interim Authority & Guidance, April 16, 2018 Existing technology that can be modified in <6 mon. to fill the gap? Can the technology be developed in <2 yrs. and <$50 M? Can technology be developed in <5 yrs? Increased capability need due to evolving threat, advancement in technology, or interoperability mission change? Rapid Fielding 806 Prototyping Rapid Prototyping Exit Utilize existing S&T pathways No Yes Need Condition Develop Ready for integration and fielding? Transition back into a program of record (traditional or existing) Field Prototype intended for rapid fielding? No Subsequent Prototyping Required? Yes No Terminate Yes Acq Framework Tool POC: Jeffrey.Schmidt@dau.mil

Guidance/Program NDAA FY16 Sec. 804 NDAA FY16 Sec. 804 NDAA FY17 Sec. 806 & 10 U.S.C. 2447 Rapid Fielding (RF) Rapid Prototyping (RP) Prototyping Motivation To use proven technologies or off-the-shelf capability to field production quantities of new or upgraded systems with minimal development required Quickly develop new capabilities or enhance existing capabilities. Must be successfully demonstrated in operation environment. To mature and demonstrate high risk technologies (high priority and emerging technologies) separate from a program of record. Oversight OSD or DoD Component The Secretary of MILDEP, oversight board Time <6 months to production <5 years from approved req. to complete fielding <5 years <2 years Funding Guidelines Program funds, with possible addl’ funding from MILDEP Rapid Prototyping Funds Program funds, with possible addl’ funding from DoD Rapid Prototyping Fund and MILDEP Rapid Prototyping Funds <$10M <$50M w/ Secretary of MILDEP approval Configuration and Testing Performance demonstration and evaluation for current operational purposes Demonstration and evaluation of the performance of fieldable prototypes developed pursuant to the program in an operational environment Technology transition plan of the prototype into a fielded system, program of record, or operational use, as appropriate Next Stage Directly enters Operations & Sustainment when fielded to warfighter Transitions to acquisition Directly enters Operation & Sustainment with residual operational capability Transition into acquisition program(s) of record

Acquisition Authority MIDDLE TIER PROTOTYPING   Acquisition Pathways Acquisition Authority Decision Authority Development Production Schedule Constraints Funding Constraints MDAP DoD 5000.02 JCIDS Other Considerations SERVICES DODI 5000.74 - Services SDO No None N/A Single Services contract no longer than 10 years WEAPON SYSTEM DODI 5000.02 - Acquisitions MDA Yes Yes (ACAT I) Comply Sec 803 - Rapid Acquisition MDA equivalent to ACAT levels Transition to normal acquisition system w/i 2 yrs $200M/year in aggregate UON required SecDef shall notify congress in 10-15 days Sec 805 - Alt Acq Path Separate from existing procedures Streamlined Rqmnts Process Max use of flexible authorities in existing law MIDDLE TIER PROTOTYPING Sec 804 - Rapid Prototyping Follow-on procurement is allowed Field prototype within 5 years Not an MDAP 10 USC 2340(a)(2) Exempt PM reports directly to SAE Sec 804 - Rapid Fielding Minimal Production begins in 6 months; Fielding w/i 5 years Sec 806 - Weapon Component Prototyping, 10 USC 2447c Selected by SAE after oversight board review Yes, production without separate competition, 10 USC 2447d(a) Prototype completed within 2 years $10M per prototype project Up to $50M w/ SECAF approval Projects exceeding funding and duration limits shall be pursued as part of a Middle Tier Rapid Prototyping process EARLY PROTOTYPING DODI 3201.3 - S&T/Early Prototyping TEO Yes, usually below TRL 3 Other Transaction Prototypes, 10 USC 2371b MDA/SDO Dependent on implementation method SAE can approve OTAs up to $500M No follow-on production contract limit Depending on $ value Depending on implementation method 10 USC 2371b(f) prod w/o separate competition; Follow-on can be OTA or a FAR-based contract

Acquisition Decision Tree Board of Directors Sec 803 Rapid Auth Weapon System (Operational System) Middle Tier Prototyping (Residual Ops or Fielding) Early Prototyping (e.g. AFRL) DoDI 5000.02 Sec 805 Alt Acq Pathway Standard Process Sec 804 Rapid Prototype w/in 5 years Sec 804 Rapid Fielding w/in 5 years Sec 806 Wpn Component Prototype w/in 2 years DoDI 3201.3 Services DoDI 5000.74 Depending on Acq. approach the following contract vehicles can be used: Fixed/Cost-Type Indefinite-Delivery Comm Svs - FAR 12 OTA BAA JCIDS JROCM UON/JOUN/JEON User Need RAD CAPABILITY ACQ AUTHORITY /TYPE CONTRACT METHOD REQUIREMENTS Acq Framework Tool POC: Jeffrey.Schmidt@dau.mil