Business Model Refined Mission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP)
MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
1 10% Appropriation Reduction for Fiscal Year December 17, 2008 Senate Criminal & Civil Justice Appropriations Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
Proposed Sobering Center Presentation Public Safety Committee February 28, 2012.
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Steve Aos Assistant Director Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Chapter 13 Parole Conditions and Revocation. Introduction Parole conditions determine the amount of freedom versus restriction a parolee has Accomplishment.
 Parole officers interact with recently-released prisoners and their families in order to help them become productive members of society.  They develop.
1 Minnesota Senate Environment, Economic Development and Agriculture Division FY General Fund Budget Presentation February 13, 2013.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Housing Matters Michael Nail Executive Director Board Members: Albert R. Murray, Chair; Terry E. Barnard, Vice-Chair; James E. Donald; James W. Mills &
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
SOAR and Consumer-Run Organizations: Informational Call! PRESENTED BY: SAMHSA SOAR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER POLICY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. UNDER CONTRACT.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
TECBD, 2003 Financial and Human Costs of Treatment or Failure to Provide Treatment Mary Quinn Jeffrey Poirier American Institutes for Research National.
Nonresidential Intermediate Sanctions
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Carson City, Nevada Alternative Sentencing April 4, 2016 Budget Workshop.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Fernando Giraldo Chief Probation Officer May 2017
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
BCJ 3150, Probation and Parole
Using the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey
Summit County Probation Services
Budget Development Discussion
Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presented by: Charlie Granville CEO, Capita Technologies Chris Baird
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2012  Quarter 2  April.
Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012.
Community Corrections 2018 Budget
C H A P T E R F I V E.
Community Corrections 2017 Budget
Intermediate Sanctions Community Corrections
Aggregate Overview of Extension District Finances in Iowa
Community Corrections 2019 Budget
Austin Community College
RSAT History, Best Practices and Future
Costing Out the Resources Needed to Meet
Chapter 12 Offender Supervision: Types of Offenders and Special Supervisory Considerations.
I want to thank you for serving on our School Council
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
How Unmet Health Needs Affect Reentry of Returning Prisoners and Success in Reintegrating Back into Communities Lois Davis, Ph.D. November 9, 2010.
Costing Out the Resources Needed to Meet
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Costing Out the Resources Needed to Meet
Presentation transcript:

Business Model Refined Mission Developed Performance Measures (process and outcome) Incorporated Evidence Based Practices Conducted Research

RESULTS

How do you translate your mission into a measurable outcome?

Budget Reduction Items Which Will Impact Agency Mission The next 4 items I will discuss will have a direct and definitive impact on our mission and public safety. My colleagues and I also ranked these in order of priority. SA counseling Drug testing GPS EM RSAT 4

Out-Patient Substance Abuse Counseling Program Of extreme importance to the Board and to the State is our substance abuse counseling program which consists of 50 contract counselors providing services to over 1,800 parolees today in 87 cities throughout Georgia. We contract with Spectrum Health Systems for these services at a total cost of $ 1.3 million per year. This is an “investment not an expenditure.” This program serves as the foundation of the Board’s evidence based practice in substance abuse treatment. (Business Practices) The indigent parolee population has been served with this consistent and reliable program. Over 9,000 of the 12,000 parolees referred last year were enrolled in this cognitive based community treatment option. A total of 7,671 group counseling sessions were delivered last year by our contract counseling staff. Each of these group sessions comprised from 4-14 parolee participants. (12-week classes) [8,359 successfully completed] Significant gains in parole success and reductions in drug use have been demonstrated since the program began in FY06. 5

Parole Supervision FY 05 Actual FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual   FY 05 Actual FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual FY 2008 Actual Number referred to drug treatment 9,862 10,277 11,919 ( 16% increase) 12,140 Number enrolled in drug treatment 6,656 7,866 9,181 (17% increase) 9,321 Number completing drug treatment 49% or 2,933 of 5,977 46% or 2,856 of 6,193 45% or 3,597 of 8,028 49% or 4,117 of 8,359 Number of parolee drug tests (episodes) 81,972 85,227 93,262 100,548 Percent of positive random drug test episodes 2,066 of 14,081 or 15% 15% or 2,205 of 14,590 12% or 1,759 of 14,232 10% or 1,409 of 14,770 Our NIJ research reveals that by merely enrolling a parolee in a substance abuse treatment program, the probability of arrest is reduced by 7%. Every attendance at this program reduces the probability of arrest by 1% per attendance. They meet 1 time per week, which equates to 4% per month reduction. Conversely, there is a 5% increase in risk of arrest each time a parolee does not attend a treatment program. Expect a reversal of the positive results that have been achieved due to increased drug use and criminal activity. Because of the importance of drug treatment and the negative impact on public safety, our results and prison bed-space, we are working with your staff to keep this funding. 6

Parolee Drug Testing 75-80% of parolees have a history of drug abuse. Over 100,000 tests were performed by parole officers in FY08. An increase in drug testing, when combined with effective substance abuse treatment has yielded positive results by reducing drug abuse by Georgia parolees. Recall, the slide I just showed where our random positive drug test results were just 10% last year. (1,409 positive out of 14,770 tested) Our recently released NIJ research revealed that For every increase in the ratio of positive to total tests, there is a 33% increase in the likelihood of arrest for a misdemeanor or felony When the ratio of positives to total tests declines, there is an equivalent reduction in the likelihood of arrest Positive drug screens are also correlated with significant increase in the risk of arrest for other technical violations – 2x Positive drug tests are the most significant factor associated with arrest and failure on parole. Frequent drug testing has a deterrent effect on parolee drug use. Most parole violations involve drug use. As a result of effective use of our drug testing and drug counseling program we have seen significant reductions over the past 3 years in Delinquent Reports submitted by Parole Officers which report violations, parole warrants issued for violations and Final Revocation Hearings conducted. Delinquent Reports Completed: Warrants Issued: Final Hearings: FY08 20,521 FY08 11,586 FY08 432 FY07 22,970 FY07 13,025 FY07 549 FY06 24,243 FY06 13,224 FY06 591 7

Global Positioning Satellite Electronic Monitoring Reductions in FY09 would cut GPS EM units in use from the current 240 to 140-150. We have 2 different types of EM. We have traditional EM, which is an ankle monitor that advises if a parolee is home or not. It is offender funded and costs $2.95 per day. This type of EM is used on the lower risk offenders. We also use GPS EM on all sex offenders for the duration of their parole supervision and on some violent offenders. This type of EM can track where a parolee has been when away from their home in addition to advising whether they are at home. This is a state funded program. We just re-negotiated the contract and the cost per day is $4.25. If the state funded GPS program is cut sex offenders and violent offenders would be placed on regular EM (offender funded) units without the ability to trace their location or threat of presence in high risk areas. GPS ensures that sex offenders and violent offenders are properly monitored and tracked. The state funded this program because indigent parolees earning minimum wage or with limited skills are least able to afford this cost and still support themselves financially. Lack of funding for this program will put more of these offenders at higher risk through placement in the less intensive, regular EM program. Our NIJ research revealed that EM violations predict an increased risk of a positive drug test and EM violations in the first 2 quarters under supervision predict an increased risk of misdemeanor arrests (15%) and other technical violations (26%). EM violations indicate an increased risk of a positive drug test 8

FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual FY 08 Actual FY 2009 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Percent of parolees acceptably completing parole supervision, based on methodology used in the BJS report. 60% or 6,686 of 11,098 61% or 6,833 of 11,182 64% or 7,024 of 10,917 63% or 1,743 of 2,764 65% or 1,785 of 2,747

Georgia Parole Success Rate vs. National Average During the three most recent legislative sessions, we have been fortunate to be the recipients of appropriations for substance abuse treatment, drug testing of parolees, electronic monitoring, other categories? All of these essential services along with dedicated and efficient work of our Central Office staff and Field Parole officers have enhanced our ability to achieve a high degree of success as illustrated by our leading indicators and parole completion (success) rate. While the NATIONAL average of parole success, at only 44%, has declined for the past 3 years, the success rate of the GEORGIA Parole Board has increased by 4 percent during the same time period. These successes translate into dollar cost savings for the state as fewer parolees are returned to prison as failures. (slide illustrating success vs. national avg.) Having illustrated our successes at our current level of funding, we recognize that economic conditions necessitate greater frugality in spending and we are (reluctantly?) prepared to offer budget cuts in programs and personnel which have contributed to this high level of success. These proposals will undoubtedly impair our potential for continued improvement, but they have been carefully deliberated and reflect the limitations of our relatively small budget and our ability to continue to fund a basic level of Parole Board operations. 10

Cost Savings to the State 11

Estimated Cost Savings $350,000,000 The effect of this $54 million appropriation is a TREMENDOUS RETURN on the investment in our agency which SAVES THE STATE an estimated $350 million dollars per year in avoidance of the cost of incarcerating the 21,600 parolees, who might otherwise be occupying extremely expensive prison bed space Whether on Wall Street or Main Street, one would be hard pressed to find an equivalent to the 6 to 1 return on investment that we provide in these times of fiscal austerity and economic challenge, but we are proud of the VALUE and ECONOMY that we bring to state government and I'm here to tell you that this is one agency where the dollars are WELL SPENT AND CAREFULLY MANAGED FOR MAXIMUM RETURN. Adjusted Base Budget $54,325,898 12

Improving Parole Completion Rates = Costs Avoided Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles Improving Parole Completion Rates = Costs Avoided

Foundation of System Effectiveness Comprehensive Framework for Paroling Center Authorities (National Institute of Corrections)