Event Shape Variables in DIS Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hadron production in hard scattering Event GeneratorGEANT.
Advertisements

Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Forward Jet Production at HERA, Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin EPS2005, July 21, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the H1 and.
Ursula Bassler, LPNHE-Paris, RUN II MC workshop 1 Monte Carlo Tuning: The HERA Experience Monte Carlo Models for DIS events Description of inclusive hadronic.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
High E T Jet Physics at HERA José Repond Argonne National Laboratory On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Small-x Workshop, Fermilab, March 28-30,
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Luca Stanco - PadovaQCD at HERA, LISHEP pQCD  JETS Luca Stanco – INFN Padova LISHEP 2006 Workshop Rio de Janeiro, April 3-7, 2006 on behalf of.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
NEW RESULTS FROM JET PHYSICS AT HERA Thomas Schörner-Sadenius Hamburg University 2 nd HERA-LHC Workshop June 2006.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 1 David Milstead Stockholm University.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Event Shapes, Alexander Savin University of WisconsinDIS 2006, April 21, Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University of Wisconsin.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Collaboration Meeting, Oct. 21st Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Event Shapes, A. Everett, U. WisconsinZEUS Meeting, March 6, Some Slides for Michele There is no subtitle.
F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.
Luca Stanco - PadovaLow-x at HERA, Small-x Low-x AND Low Q 2 Luca Stanco – INFN Padova Small-x and Diffraction 2007 Workshop FermiLab, March 28-30,
Hadron production and QCD coherence at LEP Marco Cuffiani University of Bologna and INFN (Italy) on behalf of the OPAL Collaboration QCD coherence and.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
on behalf of the CDF and DØ collaborations
Searches for double partons
Jet Production Measurements with ATLAS
Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Open Heavy Flavour Production at HERA
Event Shape Variables in Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Study of Multiplicity and Event Shapes using ZEUS detector at HERA
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Study of Multiplicity and Event Shapes using ZEUS detector at HERA
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Event Shapes, Jet Substructure and S at HERA
K0S and L production at ZEUS
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
University of Wisconsin
Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
kT Asymmetry in Longitudinally Polarized pp Collisions
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
The Tevatron Connection
Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
A brief update on b-tagging of High P jets
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
b-Quark Production at the Tevatron
Trijets in Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering
Presentation transcript:

Event Shape Variables in DIS Update A. Everett, A. Savin University of Wisconsin S. Hanlon, I. Skillicorn, A. Doyle University of Glasgow June 18, 2003

Approach to Non-Perturbative Calculations pQCD prediction → measured distribution Correction factors for non-perturbative (soft) QCD effects Separates out non-perturbative corrections for any infrared safe event shape variable, F: Power Correction independent of any fragmentation assumptions “non-perturbative parameter” – (Dokshitzer, Webber, Phys. Lett. B 352(1995)451) Used to determine the hadronization corrections Two realms: pQCD and npQCD. pQCD is calculable: uses alpha-s. npQCD is not. Recent theoretical work [2], involving power corrections to event shape variables, provides a new approach to determine the hadronisation corrections compared to monte carlo event generators. The new work involves a phenomenological model based around an effective strong coupling which comes in at low Q. This model conveniently reduces the hadronisation corrections to be of a form containing alpha-s and a new phenomenological variable alpha-0. Define power correction….. Why do we care? –> because we can’t calculate features of npQCD hadronization Future plans involve the fitting of parton level next to leading order curves with power corrections to the mean distributions. This will then yield a value for not only alpha-s but also the new phenomenological variable alpha-0 and allow tests on its universality. Relate hadronization effects to power corrections. Q dependence of the means of the event shape parameters is presented, from which both the power corrections and the strong coupling constant are determined without any assumption on fragmentation models.

Event Shape Variables Previous event shape variables not well correlated with Study: New Variables in DIS* Kout Azimuthal Correlation (following slides) *hep-ph/0111157 and hep-ph/0207072 Previous Variables from previous event shape analysis (differential distributions) Q: Why are these variables better? A1: They are new and haven't been studied before. A2: If we believe the theorists, they are more sensitive and they can be used for a good study of QCD. Part of the reason they are more sensitive is because they start at the first order in alpha-s -- whereas the other variables are not. Q: How will we use this with the previous measurements? How will we reconcile this with the values that are bad? A: This is an independent analysis. Just as dijet studies are independent of event shape studies are independent of.... It can stand alone for extraction of alpha-s and alpha-0. Later, it may also be used as a complementary measurement with the previous measurements.

Kinematic Bins Mean of Event Shape Variables has a Q dependence. Analysis done in bins of x and Q2.

Event Selection Selection Cuts Breit Frame Cuts Zufo Cuts Q2DA  80 GeV2 yJB > 0.04 yel < 0.95 Vertex with |z| < 40 cm |x| > 14 cm or |y| > 14 cm 38 < E-pZ < 65 GeV 44 < E-pZ for forward electron Good positron Sinistra Probability > 0.9 Ee’> 10 GeV Breit Frame Cuts Multiplicitycurrent ≥ 2 Ecurrent/Q > 0.25 For KOut, Acorr: At least 2 Jets in Breit Frame: E1,T > 6 GeV E2,T > 5 GeV PT,i,Lab  2 GeV Zufo Cuts Pt>0.15 GeV |η|<2.2 good acceptance region

C Parameter Compare previous event shape variables between two analyses Some small disagreement for uncorrected monte carlo at the detector level, perfect agreement at the “truth” level Uncorrected Ariadne at detector level Everett • Hanlon ┌ Collimated: values tend towards minimum Isotropic: values tend towards maximum

Detector level Ariadne Invariant Jet Mass Everett • Hanlon ┌ Analyses Comparison Detector level Ariadne Collimated: values tend towards minimum Isotropic: values tend towards maximum

Energy Flow and Dijets: TT TT axis TM axis TZ axis Tm axis axis Everett • Hanlon ┌ Detector Level Ariadne Highlight: Inclusive dijet events are important because we know that everything out of the plane is either because of higher order (in alpha-s) pQCD effects (trijets etc) OR from soft effects (hadronization etc.). If we choose only 2-jet events, then we know everything out of the plane is because of soft effects! Using a sample of well understood configurations (dijets) rather than the whole sample. 1) The corrections to well understood sample (configurations and calculations) should be better understood than the corrections to the whole sample. 2) Dijets provide the first sensitivity to alpha-s, thus we are cutting out all of the stuff that is not sensitive to alpha-s. Highlight: We need to have an event plane. We can use dijets to define the plane OR we can use thrust to define the plane. Thrust is not what I am measuring, I am only using it to define the plane. Using jets is not as good because... Collimated: values tend towards maximum Isotropic: values tend towards minimum

Energy Flow and Dijets: T TT axis TM axis TZ axis Tm axis axis Detector Level Ariadne Everett • Hanlon ┌ Highlight: Inclusive dijet events are important because we know that everything out of the plane is either because of higher order (in alpha-s) pQCD effects (trijets etc) OR from soft effects (hadronization etc.). If we choose only 2-jet events, then we know everything out of the plane is because of soft effects! Using a sample of well understood configurations (dijets) rather than the whole sample. 1) The corrections to well understood sample (configurations and calculations) should be better understood than the corrections to the whole sample. 2) Dijets provide the first sensitivity to alpha-s, thus we are cutting out all of the stuff that is not sensitive to alpha-s. Highlight: We need to have an event plane. We can use dijets to define the plane OR we can use thrust to define the plane. Thrust is not what I am measuring, I am only using it to define the plane. Using jets is not as good because... Collimated: values tend towards maximum Isotropic: values tend towards minimum

Detector Level Ariadne Broadening: BT Broadening of particles in transverse momentum wrt. thrust axis Everett • Hanlon ┌ Detector Level Ariadne BT  0 BT  0.5 Thrust Axis Thrust describes the longitudinal projection, broadening describes the transverse projection. If you think of the event as being described by a cone, Thrust describes the altitude and Broadening the radius of the base. Collimated: values tend towards minimum Isotropic: values tend towards maximum

Detector Level Ariadne Broadening: B Broadening of particles in transverse momentum wrt. photon axis Detector Level Ariadne Everett • Hanlon ┌ B  0 B  0.5 Photon Axis Thrust describes the longitudinal projection, broadening describes the transverse projection. If you think of the event as being described by a cone, Thrust describes the altitude and Broadening the radius of the base. Collimated: values tend towards minimum Isotropic: values tend towards maximum

Out-of-plane Momentum Examine New Variable: Energy flow out of event plane defined by proton direction and thrust major axis Sensitive to perturbative & non-perturbative contributions Events with more than two scattered particles will have some amount of momentum out of the event plane. With 2 jets, everything out of the plane is “extra.” It comes from either extra jets (higher order in alpha-s), or from non-perturbative QCD effects.

Theoretical Prediction for Kout Prediction by Banfi, Marchesini, Smye, Zanderighi (hep-ph/0111157) Plot ln(Kout/Q) since powers of ln(Kout/Q) used in resummation. PT distribution independent of η cut for larger K/Q xB = 0.1 Q = 30 GeV y- = 0.1 < ykt < 2.5

Kout/Q Comparison Good agreement between Data and Ariadne ’98 – ’00 Data (Everett) • Ariadne ┌ Kout/Q 0.0024 < x < 0.010 320 < Q2 < 640 GeV2

Azimuthal Correlation Examine New Variable: Momentum weighted function of the azimuthal angle around the photon-proton axis in the Breit frame between pairs (h,h’) of hadrons. h h’ pth’ pth This is based on the Energy-Energy Correlation in electron-positron annihilation. EEC used the polar angle between outgoing particles, in DIS we will use the azimuthal angle. Using the same event plane as for K_out and the photon-proton axis, we can define an azimuthal angle for the outgoing particles. Illustrated are 2 of many outgoing particles. The observable is the transverse momentum weighted sum over all pairs of outgoing particles separated by a given angle.

ACorr Comparison Good initial agreement between Data and Ariadne ’98 – ’00 Data (Everett) • Ariadne ┌ Add Data vs MC Plots Here /2   0.0024 < x < 0.6 80 < Q2 < 10240 GeV2

Summary Good agreement between Glasgow and Wisconsin Analyses Complementary analyses Agreement of differential distributions Early look at new variables Acceptable level of agreement Plan : Systematic studies Different monte carlo models Extract S,