Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
The negative impact of certain technical aspects on safety in the right-hand traffic Andrzej Bogdanowicz – Ministry of Infrastructure.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
1 Section III Day 2. 2 In this picture are a pedestrian, an inline skater, and a cyclist. They are all going the same way. Which roadway user has right.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Hand-off Warning Time of LKA
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Discussion paper – Major Issues
Lane Change Test for ACSF
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-06-25
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
AEBS/LDW Proposed changes with regard to the implementation of technical specifications for Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) GRRF st.
The specified maximum speed of ACSF system
Informal Document: ACSF-16-09
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Industry Homework from AEB 02
on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Informal document GRSG
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Signalling of information and warnings
Traffic Safety.
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion”
Maximum allowable Override Force
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion” in VRU-Proxi
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan Informal Document - ACSF-11-10 Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan Remark Secretary: The regulation text is in conformity with ACSF-11-03

Topics 2 Step Initiation (by 2 deliberate actions) Monitoring to the rear and to the side Restriction to a designated infrastructure Hands On during lane change manouevre

2 Step Initiation (by 2 deliberate actions) 5.6.4.2.11.4. Any single lane change manoeuvre shall be initiated only if commanded by two subsequent deliberate actions of the driver, within an interval of maximum [10s]. 5.6.4.2.11.4.1. The first deliberate action of the driver to start the lane change procedure shall be the manual activation of the direction indicator lamps to the intended side for the lane change. 5.6.4.2.11.5.1. The second deliberate action of the driver to start the lane change manoeuvre shall be a manual steering input in the direction of the deliberate lane change with a required steering input to the driver of more than the steering control effort necessary to override the directional control provided by the corresponding ACSF of category B1.

Monitoring to the rear and to the side A range of 8m to the side and 46m to the rear of the vehicle shall be monitored by the system. This area is based on the requirements of field of vison in R-46 (devices for indirect vision).

Monitoring to the rear and to the side rear-view according to UNECE R-46 Monitoring to the rear and to the side

Monitoring to the rear and to the side Derived rear-view range Monitoring to the rear and to the side

Monitoring to the rear and to the side 5.6.4.2.12.1. The vehicle with ACSF category C shall be equipped with means to monitor the driving environment, to recognise other road users at the side and the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle shall not carry out a lane change if a collision with a vehicle at the side or at the rear of the vehicle is imminent. The vehicle shall abort an already started lane change manoeuvre and return to the initial lane if a collision with a vehicle at the side or at the rear of the vehicle is imminent. The vehicle shall indicate to the driver if a vehicle is at the side or at the rear of the vehicle by an optical warning signal.

Restriction to a designated infrastructure 5.6.4.1.4. It shall be technically ensured that the activation of a system of Category C is only possible on a road section which is not dedicated to pedestrians or cyclists and which has a physical or constructional separation of traffic moving in opposite directions and which has at least two lanes for the direction the vehicle is driving.

Hands On during lane change manouevre 5.6.4.2.7. During the lane change procedure and in the speed range between 10 km/h or Vsmin, whichever is higher, and Vsmax, it shall provide a means of detecting that the driver is holding the steering control. When the system detects that the driver is not holding the steering control, an optical warning signal shall be provided. This signal may be the same as the signal specified below in this paragraph. The optical warning signal shall indicate to the driver to place their hands on the steering control. It shall consist of pictorial information showing hands and the steering control and may be accompanied by additional explanatory text or warning symbols.

Hands On during lane change manouevre If, after a period of no longer than 1 second the driver is not holding the steering control, at least the hands or steering control in the pictorial information provided as optical warning signal shall be shown in red and an acoustic warning signal shall be provided. The warning signals shall be active until the driver is holding the steering control, or until the system is deactivated, either manually or automatically.

Hands On during lane change manouevre If, after a period of no longer than 1 second the driver is not holding the steering control, at least the hands or steering control in the pictorial information provided as optical warning signal shall be shown in red and an acoustic warning signal shall be provided. The warning signals shall be active until the driver is holding the steering control, or until the system is deactivated, either manually or automatically.

Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure Invalidenstraße 44 D-10115 Berlin