Theoretical physics, nanoscale protein dynamics, and neutrons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NANOSCALE PROTEIN DYNAMICS AND LONG- RANGE ALLOSTERY IN CELL SIGNALING Zimei Bu 1 and David J. E. Callaway 1,2 1 City College of New York and 2 New York.
Advertisements

Gas -Conforms to shape of container -Fills the container’s entire volume -Easily compressed.
Solution structure of the constant region of nuclear envelope protein LAP2 reveals two LEM‐domain structures: one binds BAF and the other binds DNA by.
Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Protein Structure Fitting and Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Density
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Structure and Dynamics of Mechanosensor Protein α-Catenin
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
MD simulations of cotranslational folding of I27.
Molecular Basis of Fibrin Clot Elasticity
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Dynamic Allostery: Linkers Are Not Merely Flexible
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Structure and Dynamics of Calmodulin in Solution
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Implications of Microgravity on Calcium Dynamics in the Cardiac Troponin Complex Morgan Beckett University of Arizona Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry.
Yeast RNA Polymerase II at 5 Å Resolution
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Young Jun Im, James H. Hurley  Developmental Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Conformational Recognition of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Ambarish Kunwar, Michael Vershinin, Jing Xu, Steven P. Gross 
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Melissa S Jurica, Raymond J Monnat, Barry L Stoddard  Molecular Cell 
Intrinsic Bending and Structural Rearrangement of Tubulin Dimer: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Coarse-Grained Analysis  Yeshitila Gebremichael, Jhih-Wei.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Allosteric Control of Syntaxin 1a by Munc18-1: Characterization of the Open and Closed Conformations of Syntaxin  Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 93, Issue 10, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Structural Basis for the Autoinhibition of c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase
Hyper-Mobile Water Is Induced around Actin Filaments
Demian Riccardi, Qiang Cui, George N. Phillips  Biophysical Journal 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Joshua J. Sims, Robert E. Cohen  Molecular Cell 
Structure of an ATP-bound ABC dimer.
Presentation transcript:

Theoretical physics, nanoscale protein dynamics, and neutrons David J E Callaway

Overdamped, creeping motions Protein motion—low Reynolds number Overdamped, creeping motions Badminton at bottom of swimming pool filled with molasses (low Re) NOT Titanic crossing Atlantic (high Re) Theoretical physics is important! 2

Mobility tensor v = H F H is the mobility tensor, and yields the velocity of a domain given the force applied on it or another subunit. NSE yields H, given structure. (Bu et al, PNAS, 2005) 3

Effective diffusion constant measured by NSE can be easily calculated (random coil cumulants of Akcasu and Gurol evolved by us into theory of protein dynamics ) (L= Q x r ) ONLY inputs are D0 + structure + domain boundaries

for N identical domains connected by springs We show by good old theoretical physics Deff(Q→∞) = 2 x Deff(Q=0) for a uniform rigid body, but can become as large as Deff(Q→∞) = 2N x Deff(Q=0) N = 2 for N identical domains connected by springs

NSE from Farago et al Biophys J 2010 NSE dynamics of (unbound) NHERF1 alone is well described by a rigid-body model PDZ1 PDZ2 CT NHERF1 NSE from Farago et al Biophys J 2010 Only inputs to calculations are diffusion constant and SANS coordinates—no need to fit NSE data or use MD! 6

Callaway et al, JMB 2017 A B Molecular nanomachinery! FERM EBD FERM PDZ1 PDZ2 EBD B CT EBD CT FERM PDZ1 PDZ2 Figure 1. Controllable activation of nanoscale dynamics in the disordered C-tail of NHERF1 alters binding kinetics to FERM. (A) Domain organization of NHERF1. The full-length protein consists of PDZ1, PDZ2, disordered C-terminal tail (CT), EBD (magenta), and S339/S340 (red). Shown is the activation of tip of whip motion in the phosphomimic mutant revealed by NSE. Structure model was generated using the NMR structures of PDZ1 (PDB code: xxx), PDZ2 (xxx), EBD (xxx), and SANS data using the program EOM (ref). (B) FERM (gold color) binding induces EBD (magenta) to adopt a helical conformation in the complex. The structure of EBD bound to FERM is from the crystal structure PDB code: 2d10 ref.XX. Structure model of the complex was generated using the known high-resolution domain structures, and SANS data. The graphics were generated using the program UCSF Chimera (ref). Locate moving part (frog tongue) by NSE Molecular nanomachinery! 7

A B C Figure 4. NSE spectra as at different Q values for NHERF1(S339D/S340D) in (A) 150 mM NaCl, and (B) 150 mM NaCll, 20 mM dTris (pD=7.5) D2O buffer solution. (C) NSE measured Deff(Q) as a function of Q for NHERF1(S339D/S340D) in 300 mM NaCl (Black) and 150 mM NaCl (red), and 20 mM dTris (pD=7.5) D2O solution. Open black circle is the center-of-mass diffusion constant Do. The black lines are the Deff(Q) calculated from two sets of represented structural coordinates assuming rigid-body diffusion. The red lines are calculated Deff(Q) assuming motion near the “KRAP” motif. 8

NO large scale simulations or network models Take-home message: Can easily calculate Deff(Q) from: structure + diffusion constant + domain boundaries NO curve fitting NO large scale simulations or network models AND use it to characterize protein motion by NSE ! Theoretical (physics) approaches can be highly useful !

And a cast of hundreds from ORNL ILL CCNY Juelich Stanford ….