MSBSD Principal Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation Model
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment April 19, 2008.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT Dr. Lewis D. Ferebee, Superintendent Dr. Wanda H. Legrand, Deputy Superintendent for Academics May 29, 2015.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Student Growth Objectives Overview and Impact on Educational Specialists.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Examining Student Work and Data Professional Learning Community Action Teams PUSD Instructional Services-PLC Action Team Training Fall 2008.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Literacy Design Collaborative & the Common Core State Standards Implementation Plan 1.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
MSBSD Teacher Evaluation
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Chapter 1: Cultivating Community, Culture, and Learning Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Implementation Strategy: K-8, Algebra I, Algebra II and Geometry
The New Educator Evaluation System
Problem Solving Process.
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Teacher Evaluation System
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Five Required Elements
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Commissioner’s Update
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Woodson Park Academy (Douglas Cluster)
Presentation transcript:

MSBSD Principal Evaluation Friday, December 9th

Credit Where Credit Is Due… Dr. Rob Picou & Dina Henderson

MSBSD Principal Evaluations Guiding Philosophy & Beliefs Process Development & Timeline Example of Principal Evaluation Cycle Forms are included in your folders Thumb Drive with Adobe editable forms OASYS – Electronic Evaluation DEMO Questions & Answer

Process Stakeholder Committees Met Sp14 Implemented in Fall15 Identified Nationally Recognized Model Marzano Framework Adopted 4 of the 5 Domains 14 of the 24 Components with Modifications Reviewed with ALL Principals and Revised Implemented in Fall15 Electronic version required for all principals

School Leader Evaluation Model Domain 4: School Climate Domain 3: Professionalism and Collaboration Domain 1: Focus on Student Achievement Domain 2: Continuous Improvement of Instruction

Evaluation Process Overview Principal Self Reflection Beginning of the Year Conference Informal Observation(s) Summative Evaluation Conference

Common Principal Artifacts Domain 1: Focus on Student Achievement Component 1a - Clear and measureable goals Component 1b – Data are analyzed, interpreted, & monitored Component 1c – Effective programs and practices are implemented 1. Identification of an academic achievement goal Examples: - Increase in reading, writing, or math achievement by school, grade, or sub group - Decrease in D’s and F’s - Increase in passing rates by targeted course - Increase in graduation rate by class or sub group   Required Artifact: Complete Academic Achievement Goal Template

Common Principal Artifacts Domain 2: Continuous Improvement of Instruction Component 2a – Common expectations for instruction & PD Component 2b – Providing feedback on staff strengths & weaknesses 2. Alignment of Professional Development to Staff and Student Needs Required Artifact: Comparison of Teacher Self- Assessment vs. Principal Rating Report   Examples of Additional Artifacts: Professional Development Plan, FLT Syllabus, Rosters of Staff Attendance in District Facilitated FLTs, Student Data Related to PD Efforts

Questions & Answers