Compressed Representations of Macromolecular Structures and Properties

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Advertisements

Tangible Interfaces for Structural Molecular Biology
Heads Up S-Layer Display: The Power of Many
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Thomas D. Goddard, Conrad C. Huang, Thomas E. Ferrin  Structure 
Using Enhanced Sampling and Structural Restraints to Refine Atomic Structures into Low-Resolution Electron Microscopy Maps  Harish Vashisth, Georgios.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Heads Up S-Layer Display: The Power of Many
Martin Petřek, Pavlína Košinová, Jaroslav Koča, Michal Otyepka 
An Approach for De Novo Structure Determination of Dynamic Molecular Assemblies by Electron Cryomicroscopy  Bjoern Sander, Monika M. Golas, Reinhard Lührmann,
Tangible Interfaces for Structural Molecular Biology
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Model Building and Refinement of a Natively Glycosylated HIV-1 Env Protein by High- Resolution Cryoelectron Microscopy  Jeong Hyun Lee, Natalia de Val,
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Ab Initio Structure Determination from Electron Microscopic Images of Single Molecules Coexisting in Different Functional States  Dominika Elmlund, Ralph.
Matthew L. Baker, Tao Ju, Wah Chiu  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structure of the Oligosaccharyl Transferase Complex at 12 Å Resolution
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Structural and Thermodynamic Principles of Viral Packaging
Frank Alber, Michael F. Kim, Andrej Sali  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Grace W. Tang, Russ B. Altman  Structure 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
The Ribosome Emerges from a Black Box
Electron Cryotomography of the E
Shuchismita Dutta, Helen M. Berman  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Zheng Liu, Fei Guo, Feng Wang, Tian-Cheng Li, Wen Jiang  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Penton Release from P22 Heat-Expanded Capsids Suggests Importance of Stabilizing Penton-Hexon Interactions during Capsid Maturation  Carolyn M. Teschke,
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Tangible Interfaces for Structural Molecular Biology
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Vision: Attending the Invisible
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Presentation transcript:

Compressed Representations of Macromolecular Structures and Properties Chandrajit Bajaj, Julio Castrillon-Candas, Vinay Siddavanahalli, Zaiqing Xu  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 463-471 (March 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 HB Zero-Bit Compression Example of a Volumetric Electron Density Representation of a Large Ribosomal Subunit (PDB: 1JJ2) (Figure created using Volume Rover.) (A) In this image we show a volume rendering of the electron density map of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å. This molecule has 98543 atoms and the electron density map has been generated using a grid of 2563 voxels with a decay parameter of B = −1. The grid resolution is approximately 1 Å. On the right image, we show the volume rendering of the entire molecule. The left image shows a zoomed portion of the ribosomal subunit. In particular, this zoomed portion corresponds to the main active sites of the ribosome, where green is the Aminoacyl (A) site, red the Peptidyl (P) site and blue the Exit site (E). (B) Zero-bit HB with threshold = 0.05 and compression = 11:1. (C) Zero-bit HB with threshold = 0.15, compression = 30:1. (D) Zero-bit HB with threshold = 0.50, compression = 65:1. For increase compression, we observe very little degradation on volume rendering of the molecular structure. Volume rendering is a smoothing operation, thus visual errors tend to be blurred out. The error in the compressed map is much more clearly seen for isosurfaces, as will be shown in Figure 2. Structure 2005 13, 463-471DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 HB Zero-Bit Compression Example of a Volumetric Electron Density Representation of a Large Ribosomal Subunit (PDB: 1JJ2), at near Atomistic Resolution (Figure created using Volume Rover.) (A) In this image we show a volume rendering of the electron density map of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å. This molecule has 98543 atoms and the electron density map has been generated using a grid of 5123 voxels with a decay parameter of B = −5, which shows higher molecular detail than in Figure 1. Out of this grid, we extract a subvolume of 2163 voxels that contains the A, P, and E active sites. The grid resolution is approximately 0.5 Å. Note that this is a minimal uniform resolution needed to obtain accurate isosurfaces. A coarser resolution leads to very displeasing artifacts, where many of the atomistic details are difficult to recognize. On the right image, we have the volume rendering of the A, P, and E active sites of the ribosome. The left image shows a zoomed portion of the ribosomal structure, where several nucleotides on the active site can be seen. (B) Zero-bit HB compression with threshold = 0.05 and compression = 8:1. (C) Zero-bit HB compression with threshold = 0.15, compression = 18:1. (D) Zero-bit HB compression with threshold = 0.50, compression = 42:1. For the volume rendered image on the right, very little degradation of the ribosomal structure is visible as the compression increases. In contrast, the atomistic details shown via isosurface rendering clearly degrade. Structure 2005 13, 463-471DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 HB Zero-Bit Compression of a Volumetric Electron Density Representation of a Microtubule Structure (Figure created using Volume Rover.) (A) This microtubule representation has 1,210,410 atoms and the electron density map has been embedded in a grid of 512 ∗ 512 ∗ 1024 voxels with a decay parameter of B = −2.3. The grid resolution is of approximately 0.6 Å. The image above shows the isosurface of the microtubule at atomic resolution. (B) Zero-bit HB compression with threshold = 0.05 and compression = 32:1. (C) Zero-bit HB compression with threshold = 0.15, compression = 77:1. (D) Zero-bit HB compression with threshold = 0.35, compression = 132:1. This image clearly shows the degradation of the molecular data with respect to very high compression. At a compression ratio of 132, structural feature degradation is quite apparent. Structure 2005 13, 463-471DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 HB Compression Example of a Reconstructed 3D Map of an RDV Structure (Figure created using Volume Rover.) (A) Volume rendering and isosurface of the RDV map at 6.8 Å resolution in a grid of 241 ∗ 4812 voxels. On the right image, the outer capsid layer is rendered in green. The left image shows a zoomed portion of the capsid, displaying one of the trimeric subunits (purple). (B) Threshold = 0.15, compression = 22:1. (C) Threshold = 0.35, compression = 37:1. (D) Threshold = 0.50, compression = 57:1. As the compression increases, we observe a slight degradation in the trimeric subunit of the virus capsid. Structure 2005 13, 463-471DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 HB Zero-Bit Compression Example on a Computed Electrostatics Potential Field Property of a Large Ribosomal Subunit (Figure created using Volume Rover.) (A) Noncompressed map of the potential field of the large ribosomal subunit. This 5123 gridded field data was created using the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (Baker et al., 2001). The right image shows two isosurfaces of the field, where the blue isosurface is positive and the red one is negative potential. The left image shows a zoomed portion of the field, as captured by the smaller cube shown in the right image. The pictures are created using our center’s VolRover software. (B) Zero-bit HB with threshold= 0.05, compression = 41:1. (C) Zero-bit HB with threshold = 0.15, compression = 55:1. (D) Zero-bit HB with threshold = 0.35, compression = 62:1. We see very little degradation of the field as we increase the compression. However, as shown in Table 2, the errors clearly increase with higher compression. Structure 2005 13, 463-471DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Compression Comparison between Zero-Bit HB and Haar Schemes (Figure created using Volume Rover.) (A) Rendering example of the large ribosomal subunit data set (See also Figure 2). In the right image, a portion of the electron density of the ribosome is shown. This portion corresponds to the active P site (Peptidyl transferase activity). The left image shows a zoomed part of the active site. This figure contains a colored purple isosurface showing the hexagonal shape of a purine nucleotide near the active site. (B) HB method, compression = 42:1. For a 42:1 compression ratio we observe degradation of the molecular structure. However, the nucleotide structure can still be distinguished with our HB method. This in contrast to the Haar representation. (C) Haar method, compression = 42:1. For the Haar method we observe that for the same compression as HB, the hexagonal shape of the nucleotides is highly distorted. In addition, volume rendered image on the right appears blocky. Structure 2005 13, 463-471DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.02.004) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions