Engineering Geology and Seismology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic analysis and design of
Advertisements

2nd year SAFER Project meeting. Armada Hotel, Istanbul, Turkey June, Information-dependent lead time maps for earthquake early warning in the.
Establishing Basic Parameters: Risk Assessment
2013 Northwest Hydro Operators Forum 1 Risk-Informed Decision Making – FERC Perspective David Lord, P.E., D2SI Dam Safety Risk team – Portland, Or Natural.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Operational Earthquake Loss Forecasting in Italy: Preliminary Results I. Iervolino, 1 E. Chioccarelli, 1 M. Giorgio, 2 W. Marzocchi, 3 A. Lombardi, 3 G.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
International Insurance-Reinsurance Forum 2012 Managing catastrophic risks From Seismic Hazard Analysis to Seismic Risk mitigation C.O.Cioflan Ph.D., Senior.
Application of GIS for Seismic Observation in Papua New Guinea
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
New “Risk-Targeted” Seismic Maps Introduced into USA Building Codes
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
1 High Performance Computing at SCEC Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California.
By virtue of the sloping topography of the region and the quality of the soil, as well as its proximity to the Dead Sea fault, region is exposed to.
Multi hazard approach to design of civil structures April 29 th 2010 Multi hazard approach to design of civil structures Domenico Asprone Dipartimento.
Course Schedule: Week 1 DAYDATEMORNING ( )LecturerAFTERNOON ( ) Prepared by Monday 2nd September Hazard and Risk; Tectonics; Earthquakes & Faults DMB Practicum.
Rose School Lectures – 2013 S. Akkar and D. M. Boore Engineering Seismology & Seismic Hazard Assessment HAZARD and RISK, TECTONICS, EARTHQUAKES and FAULTS.
1. 2 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Lecture#14 Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering.
Outline: Lecture 4 Risk Assessment I.The concepts of risk and hazard II.Shaking hazard of Afghanistan III.Seismic zone maps IV.Construction practice What.
Earthquakes.
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Earthquake Loss Estimation
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
A 21 ST CENTURY LOOKBACK WILL SUSTAIN A COMMUNITY’S FOCUS ON DISASTER RESILIENCE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Pacific Island Countries GIS/RS User Conference Suva, Fiji November 2010 Tools for Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation Abigail Baca.
1 Risk comments including some Re-insurance issues (Socio-Economic Security)  Jorge A. Prieto, PhD. PEng.  Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey.
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
1 Earthquake Hazard Update April 21, 2015 NMSZ ROC.
1. 2 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Lecture#15 Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering.
Application of SASHA for the Icelandic case Vera D’Amico 1, Dario Albarello 2, Ragnar Sigbjörnsson 3, Rajesh Rupakhety 3 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica.
Earthquake hazard isn’t a physical thing we measure. It's something mapmakers define and then use computer programs to predict. To decide how much to believe.
OPENQUAKE Mission and Vision It is GEM’s mission to engage a global community in the design, development and deployment of state-of-the-art models and.
Chapter 8 Earthquakes. I. What are Earthquakes? Seismology is the science devoted to studying earthquakes Most take place near the edges of tectonic plates.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Benefit Cost Analysis for Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Method (selected excerpts from FEMA EMI Training Course)
Shelley Jules-Plag & Hans - Peter Plag ARE BUILDING CODES CONSISTENT WITH OUR KNOWLEDGE OF GEOHAZARDS?
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation for Vulnerability.
Important topics related to earthquake hazard Calling for Bi-lateral collaboration.
Translating the 2009 Provisions into ASCE 7-10: Ground Motions Maps
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Quantitative annual multi hazard risk assessment.
Tri-State Seismic Hazard Mapping -Kentucky Plan
THE FINAL SECTION! 5. Adjustments and responses to hazards and disasters.
Ground Motion and Building Response. Building Oscillation Seismic Simulation Thanks to FEMA, for original design.
Risk assessment and Natural Hazards. Concept of vulnerability (e.g. fatalities in two contrasting societies) Deaths 1 …………………………………………
Antonella Peresan F. Vaccari, A. Magrin, G.F. Panza, S. Cozzini B.K. Rastogi, I. Parvez Antonella Peresan F. Vaccari, A. Magrin, G.F. Panza, S. Cozzini.
Metrics, Bayes, and BOGSAT: Recognizing and Assessing Uncertainties in Earthquake Hazard Maps Seth Stein 1, Edward M. Brooks 1, Bruce D. Spencer 2 1 Department.
A SAMPLING OF BRIDGE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA BY MARK YASHINSKY, CALTRANS OFFICE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Most bridge owners have adopted design criteria.
DISASTER VULNERABILITY, RISK AND CAPACITY
International Seismic Safety Organization* 20 September 2012
British Seismology Meeting 5th – 7th April 2017, Reading, UK
Bolonha, 3-6 March 2014 Module: Seismicity and seismic risk
HAZARD AND FRAGILITY ANALYSIS
Multi-Hazard Risk Report for Tillamook County
Section 4: Earthquakes and Society
CE 5603 Seismic Hazard Assessment
Risk Assessment Maps for Seaside OR
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
Section 4: Earthquakes and Society
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
A Family Affair: Jerome Stein (Father, Econ) and Seth Stein (Son, Geo)
Statistical feedback…?
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
End-Users Needs in Seismic Hazard Analysis
UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards
Presentation transcript:

Engineering Geology and Seismology Lecture#17 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar

Outlines of the Presentation Seismic Risk Seismic Hazard Assessment Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) Probablistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA)

Seismic Risk SEISMIC RISK refers to the amount of damage to be expected with a certain probability in a fixed period time. It is the composition of RISK =HAZARD * EXPOSURE * VULNERABILITY The hazard is controlled by Nature. Vulnerability and Exposure are controlled by humans. 4

Seismic Risk Seismic hazard is the probability of observing a certain ground shaking (e.g., PGA, macro-seismic intensity, etc.) in a fixed time period. Vulnerability is the tendency of a structure to suffer damage. Exposed value is an economic, but also social, quantification of the object exposed to earthquakes. 5

Nature Engineers Planners

Seismic Hazard Zoning Map 7 N-W.F.P UET, Peshawar 7

“Natural” Disasters and Casualties

Economic Impact of Earthquakes The Gross National Product (GNP) is the total dollar value of all final goods and services produced for consumption in society during a particular time period.

Seismic Risk Mitigation HAZARD * EXPOSURE * VULNERABILITY * COST Assess Control Reduce Balance

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) The different sources of seismicity around a site are identified and an earthquake scenario is fixed for each of source. The location of the scenario is usually taken to be at the least favourable location, in other words at the closest approach to the site, possibly such that the site will also experience forward directivity effects. The magnitude of each scenario is a more difficult subject to select. However, the results of a deterministic analysis are far more sensitive to the choice of upper-bound magnitude than a probabilistic analysis. The term generally used to define the size of the controlling event is the Maximum Credible Earthquake (MCE), although there are many who argue for this term to be abandoned. 11

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) Once the design scenarios are fixed in terms of magnitude and distance from the site, it is a very straightforward operation to estimate the resulting levels of ground motion using attenuation relationships. The most onerous ground motion can then be taken as the basis for design, although in some cases it may be necessary to consider more than one scenario if the ground motions do not show a single clearly dominant case. 12

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) 13

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) Once the design scenarios are fixed in terms of magnitude and distance from the site, it is a very straightforward operation to estimate the resulting levels of ground motion using attenuation relationships. The most onerous ground motion can then be taken as the basis for design, although in some cases it may be necessary to consider more than one scenario if the ground motions do not show a single clearly dominant case. 14