Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
by Jad I. Belle, David Langlais, Jessica C
Advertisements

Maintenance of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 Chemokine Signaling in Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Niches  Tatsuki Sugiyama, Hiroshi Kohara,
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
by Shawn W. Cochrane, Ying Zhao, Robert S. Welner, and Xiao-Hong Sun
by Neil P. Rodrigues, Viktor Janzen, Randolf Forkert, David M
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Francesca Ficara, Mark J. Murphy, Min Lin, Michael L. Cleary 
by Jonathan Hoggatt, Pratibha Singh, Janardhan Sampath, and Louis M
Cited2 Is an Essential Regulator of Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells
by Xue Li, Jared Sipple, Qishen Pang, and Wei Du
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Stimulate Hematopoietic Progenitors by Promoting Cytokine Release from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells  Christian M. Schürch,
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Christine V. Ichim, Džana D
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
p53 Regulates Hematopoietic Stem Cell Quiescence
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Targeting Tetramer-Forming GABPβ Isoforms Impairs Self-Renewal of Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cells  Shuyang Yu, Xuefang Jing, John D. Colgan, Dong-Mei.
Mark J. Kiel, Melih Acar, Glenn L. Radice, Sean J. Morrison 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2018)
Juana Serrano-Lopez, Kalpana Nattamai, Nicholas A. Pease, Miranda S
Kenichi Miharada, Valgardur Sigurdsson, Stefan Karlsson  Cell Reports 
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
SHIP is required for a functional hematopoietic stem cell niche
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Masayuki Yamashita, Eriko Nitta, Toshio Suda  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 380-391 (April 2008) The Transcription Factor EGR1 Controls Both the Proliferation and Localization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells  Irene M. Min, Giorgio Pietramaggiori, Francis S. Kim, Emmanuelle Passegué, Kristen E. Stevenson, Amy J. Wagers  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 380-391 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Egr1 Is Highly Expressed by LT-HSCs and Downregulated by Cy/G Mobilization (A) Expression of immediate early response genes was determined by qRT-PCR for double-sorted KTLS HSCs isolated from untreated (D-1 BM), or Cy/G-treated BM (D+2 BM or D+4 BM) or spleen (D+4 SP), at the indicated time points (day −1, day +2, or day +4) of the Cy/G-mobilization regimen. In all experiments, mice receive Cy on day −1, and subsequent daily doses of G. Mice were sacrificed for analysis on the indicated days in lieu of treatment. Values have been normalized for β-actin expression levels, and for each gene, relative expression at each time point is expressed as fold induction compared to the level (set to 1) detected in D-1 HSCs. Results (mean + SD) are obtained from three independently sorted sets of populations (∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). (B) Egr1 levels relative to β-actin mRNA were determined by qRT-PCR for lineage-depleted bone marrow (Lin− BM) or the indicated populations of double-sorted BM cells. Results were obtained from three independent experiments and are presented as fold difference in relative expression (mean + SD) compared to the average level (set to 1) detected in Lin− BM (∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Increased Fraction of Cycling LT-HSCs in Egr1−/− Mice (A) Frequency (%) KLS34− (left) or KLSF (right) BM LT-HSCs in S/G2-M phases (i.e., > 2n DNA content) in Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− (n = 7–9 per group) mice (∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001 by Wilcoxon test). (B) Frequency of BrdU+ KLS34-LT-HSCs in the BM of Egr1+/+ and Egr1−/− mice 1 hr after systemic BrdU administration (∗∗p ≤ 0.01; n = 5 per genotype). (C and D) Frequencies (C) and numbers (D) of KLS34− (left) and KLSF (right) LT-HSCs in Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− BM (2 femurs and 2 tibiae/mouse) were determined by flow cytometry and total BM cellularity (∗p ≤ 0.05 by Wilcoxon test). (E) Frequency (%) of Annexin V+/PI− apoptotic KLS34− (left) or KLSF (right) BM LT-HSCs (n = 9 for each genotype). No significant differences were observed between Egr1+/+ and Egr1−/− mice. Data are presented as boxplots. The middle line in each boxplot indicates the median value, the upper and lower edges of the boxplot are the 75th and 25th percentiles, and the small horizontal bars denote the 75th percentile + 1.5∗interquartile range and 25th percentile − 1.5∗interquartile range. Filled circles mark the outliers. Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Altered Expression Profile of Cell-Cycle Regulatory Genes in Egr1−/− Mice and Cell-Cycle Regulation of Egr1 in Wild-Type LT-HSCs (A) Cell-intrinsic regulation of HSC/early progenitor proliferation by Egr1. (Left) Double-sorted single KLSF LT-HSCs were maintained in serum-free medium with minimal cytokine supplements (Ema et al., 2000; Uchida et al., 2003). HSC/early progenitors from Egr1−/− mice proliferated more rapidly than Egr1+/+ cells (∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗p ≤ 0.01; n = 72 for Egr1+/+ and 117 for Egr1−/−). Data are presented as mean + SD. (Right) The rate of apoptosis (% Annexin V+/PI− cells), assayed 3 days after culture initiation, was similar among Lin−Egr1+/+ and Egr1−/− HSC/early progenitors, when 200 double-sorted KLSF LT-HSCs were maintained in the same culture conditions as for single KLSF LT-HSCs (n = 11 for Egr1+/+ and 16 for Egr1−/−). (B) Relative expression of indicated mRNA in sorted KSLF LT-HSCs, analyzed by qRT-PCR. n = three to five independent experiments using pooled BM cells from 3–5 mice. Data are presented as mean + SD, and are normalized for β-actin expression as in Figure 1B (∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01). (C) qRT-PCR analysis of Egr1 expression levels in sorted Egr1+/+ KSLF LT-HSCs at G0, G1, or S/G2-M phases of cell cycle. Cell-cycle stage was distinguished by staining with Hoechst 33342 and Pyronin Y (PY) as in Passegue et al. (2005). Data are summarized as mean + SD for two independent sort experiments of 3–4 pooled BM cells of Egr1+/+ mice and are normalized for β-actin levels as above (∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Loss of Egr1 in BM Cells Does Not Impair Hematopoietic Engraftment Ability (A) Noncompetitive BM transplantation. Lethally irradiated congenic CD45.1+ or F1 recipients received 500,000 CD45.2+ WBM cells from Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− mice. The percent donor-derived cells among total blood leukocytes, total BM cells, and BM KLSF LT-HSCs was determined by flow cytometry and is plotted for each individual recipient at 8 weeks posttransplant. Median values are indicated by the horizontal bars. Data are combined from two separate experiments and do not differ significantly between recipients of Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− cells (analyzed by Wilcoxon test). (B) Blood repopulation analysis of noncompetitively transplanted Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− WBM cells at 14 weeks after BM transplantation. Recipients of Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− WBM cells exhibited no significant differences in the percent donor-derived peripheral blood leukocytes (shown as mean + SD, n = 5–6 recipients per genotype). (C–F) Competitive BM transplantation. WBM cells (25,000 or 100,000) from Egr1+/+ (♦ for 25,000 and ⋄ for 100,000) or Egr1−/− (● for 25,000, ○ for 100,000) were transplanted into lethally irradiated congenic recipients, along with 200,000 host-type competitor WBM cells. Data are plotted as mean (+SD) percent donor-derived total blood leukocytes (C), Mac1+Gr1+ myeloid cells (D), CD3/4/8+ T cells (E), or B220+ B cells (F) in each transplantation setting, as determined by flow cytometric analysis of recipient peripheral blood at 4, 6, 8, and 19 weeks posttransplant. Data are compiled from three independent experiments. Donor-derived myeloid engraftment at 19 weeks was significantly higher in recipients of 25,000 Egr1−/− cells as compared to recipients of 25,000 Egr1+/+ cells (∗p ≤ 0.05 by Wilcoxon test). Other differences were not statistically significant. Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Egr1 Deficiency in Hematopoietic Cells Induces Rapid HSC Exhaustion in Serial BM Transplantation (A) Analysis of radioprotection by donor Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− WBM cells in each round of serial BM transplantation. Donor Egr1+/+ or Egr1−/− WBM cells were noncompetitively transplanted into lethally irradiated congenic wild-type recipients (0.5 × 106 donor cells/mouse; n = 13 per genotype) for the primary transplantation (1′ BMT). After 8 weeks, donor-derived WBM cells were isolated from the 1′ transplant recipients by FACS, and secondarily transplanted into lethally irradiated congenic recipients (1 × 106 donor cells/mouse; n = 13–14 per genotype) (2′ BMT). Tertiary BM transplantation (3′ BMT) was performed similarly 18 weeks after 2′ BMT (n = 5–6 per genotype). (B) Secondary blood repopulation analysis. The percentages of donor-derived total lymphocytes, myeloid cells, T cells, and B cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 16 weeks after 2′ BMT. Data show the average percent + SD. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of the 3′ BMT shows the significant loss of radioprotective activity in recipients of Egr1−/− donor BM cells relative to Egr1+/+ donors (p = 0.03 by log-rank test). Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Egr1−/− Mice Exhibit Spontaneous Mobilization of HSCs into PB (A) Representative FACS plots depicting higher frequencies of KLSF LT-HSCs in Egr1+/+ (top row) versus Egr1−/− (bottom row) are shown. Plots on the left were first gated on Lin− PB leukocytes. Plots on the right show events in the c-kit+Sca-1+ gate (shown on the left). Numbers above each gate show the percentage of events within the gate. (B) Quantification of the overall frequency (percent of live PB leukocytes) and number of KLSF LT-HSCs in the PB of Egr1−/− or Egr1+/+ mice. HSC frequencies were determined by flow cytometry, with median (horizontal bar) shown on the boxplot. Differences between Egr1−/− and Egr1+/+ mice are significant (∗∗p ≤ 0.01 by Wilcoxon test). (C–F) Enhanced engraftment of recipient mice by Egr1−/− PB cells. Lethally irradiated congenic recipients received 3 × 106 whole PB cells from Egr1+/+ (⋄, dashed lines) or Egr1−/− (●, solid lines) recipients, together with 3 × 105 host-type BM cells. Data are plotted for individual recipient mice as the percent donor-derived total blood leukocytes (C), myeloid cells (D), T cells (E), or B cells (F), as determined by flow cytometric analysis of recipient PB at 6, 12, and 16 weeks posttransplant. Recipients of Egr1−/− PB cells showed significantly higher engraftment in all lineages at 16 weeks posttransplant, as compared to recipients of Egr1+/+ PB cells (∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗p ≤ 0.05 at week 16). Data are combined from two independent transplant experiments representing a total of nine animals per genotype. Gray line indicates the background level of staining in each analysis. Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 EGR1 Plays a Dual Role in Limiting LT-HSC Proliferation and Migration Potential mechanisms of EGR1 function, suggested by our studies, are indicated. Whether crosstalk between HSC proliferation and migration contributes to the coordinate regulation of LT-HSCs by Egr1 remains to be determined. Cell Stem Cell 2008 2, 380-391DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions