TGad January 2010 Report Date: 2010-01-20 Authors: January 2010 April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 TGad January 2010 Report Date: 2010-01-20 Authors: Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 Meeting Protocol Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot Slide 2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Register Indicate attendance Attendance January 2010 Attendance https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index Register Indicate attendance See document 11-09-0517r0 for more details Slide 3 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Attendance, Voting & Document Status January 2010 Attendance, Voting & Document Status Make sure your badges are correct If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area see Adrian Stephens – adrian.p.stephens@intel.com Cell Phones Silent or Off Slide 4 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Patent Policy Following 5 slides January 2010 April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Patent Policy Following 5 slides Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Instructions for the WG Chair April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. (Optional to be shown) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Patent Related Links Patent Policy is stated in these sources: April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Slide #2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Call for Potentially Essential Patents April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Agenda Items for the Week January 2010 Agenda Items for the Week Call for secretary Review from November Review conference calls Approve minutes from November Planning for proposal presentations in March and May Continue developing task group documents Channel modeling Evaluation methodology Selection Procedure Motions of drafts of task group documents Technical Submissions Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Submissions January 2010 Evaluation Methodology (Tues PM1) April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Submissions Evaluation Methodology (Tues PM1) 10/0067r0, TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations, Minyoung Park 09/1160r2, update on coexistence evaluation methodology, John Barr Enhancements to Evaluation Methodology targeting handheld devices, Hemanth Sampath 09/0296r13, Update to evaluation methodology document, Eldad Perahia Channel Modeling 10/0090r0, Human Body Blockage, Martin Jacob (Tues evening) Channel model update, Alexander Maltsev (Tues evening) intra-cluster channel model for TGad channel modeling, Hirokazu Sawada (Tues evening) 09/334rX, Update to Channel Model document, Alexander Maltsev (Wed) Selection procedure 09/935r5, update to selection procedure, Matt Fischer (Wed) Other 60 GHz in-cabin environment, Alexis Paolo Garcia Ariza (Mon) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week Monday Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 Call for secretary Patent policy, etc. Set agenda Call for submissions Review from November Approve minutes from November Review from conference calls Planning for proposal presentations in March and May Goals for March Conference calls Other presentations Tuesday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 Evaluation methodology doc development Channel modeling doc development Other presentations if time permits Tuesday Jan 19th, 19:30 – 21:30 Wed Jan 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 Call for secretary Evaluation methodology doc development Channel modeling doc development Selection Procedure doc development Other presentations if time permits Thursday Jan 21st, 13:30 – 15:30 Special orders of the day of the three motions at 13:40 Motion on Selection Procedure doc 5 min, discussion 30 min, roll call Motion on Channel Modeling doc Motion on Evaluation Methodology doc Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Agenda for Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 Call for secretary April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Agenda for Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 Call for secretary Patent policy, etc. Set agenda Call for submissions Review from November Approve minutes from November Review from conference calls Planning for proposal presentations in March and May Goals for March Conference calls Other presentations Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Review from November (1/2) January 2010 Review from November (1/2) Evaluation Methodology 09/1160, Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions, John Barr 09/1216, Internet traffic modeling, Sai Nandagopalan 09/1213, 60GHz Impairments Modeling, Vinko Erceg 09/1222r1, Hard disk drive traffic model, Eldad Perahia 09/1229, Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals, Alexander Maltsev 09/296r12, Update to Evaluation Methodology document, Eldad Perahia 09/1210, Coexistence Techniques, Tuncer Baykas Motion to adopt 09/0296r12 as the first draft of the TGad evaluation methodology failed 24/20/7 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Review from November (2/2) April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Review from November (2/2) Channel Modeling 09/1252, Inter Cluster Parameters of Living Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev 09/1152, 60-GHz Living-Room Channel Measurements, Tian-Wei Huang 09/1169, Human Body Blockage - Guidelines for TGad MAC development, Thomas Kürner 09/1170, Modeling the human induced 60 GHz channel dynamics, Thomas Kürner 09/1165, 60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity, Chris Hansen 09/1232, Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part2), Hirokazu Sawada Other technical submissions 09/1153, 60GHz Beamforming, Carlos Cordeiro 09/1168, SCR Design and Performance Assessment, John Stine Call for Proposals Motion to adopt 09/1206r0 as the TGad call for proposals passed 50/0/19 Chair to announce in WG and email reflector Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 November Minutes Motion to approve November ‘09 TGad minutes as contained in 11-09-1118r0 Move: Vinko Second: Al Petrick No objection Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Review of Conference Calls January 2010 Review of Conference Calls Cumulative minutes from 2009 in 09/0229r8 Cumulative minutes from 2010 in 10/0013r0 Dec 10, 2009 10:00 ET 11-09/1160r1, Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions, John Barr Jan 7, 2010 10:00 ET Channel Model discussion 11-10/0011r0, Radio over Fiber for an optimal 60 GHz Home Area Network, Joffray Guillory 11-09/1317r1, Internet Traffic Modeling, Sai Nandagopalan Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Planning for proposal presentations in March and May January 2010 Planning for proposal presentations in March and May Notifications of intent (as of 2009-01-19) 38 new techniques (including late notifications) 11 requested to present in March 26 requested to present in May 1 requested to present in March or May 4 complete (including late notifications) Time requirements Assumptions: All “March or May” are presented in March Exactly 30 minutes allocation for new technique (inclusive of presentation, Q&A, strawpoll) Exactly 60 minutes allocation for complete (inclusive of presentation, Q&A, strawpoll) March: 3 meeting time slots May: 8.5 meeting time slots Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 List of Proposals as of 2009-01-19 (in order of receipt of notification) (1/2) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 List of Proposals as of 2009-01-19 (in order of receipt of notification) (2/2) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 Late Notifications Deadline for notification was December 18, 2009 (midnight, GMT-5) Late notifications that were received after the deadline are indicated with ‘*’ in List of Proposals Need to affirm inclusion of late notifications as part of the presentation set Priority given to on-time notifications when ordering presentations Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 Motion Move: affirm inclusion of late notifications in the presentation set Move: Vinko Second: Rolf No objection Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Proposal Presentation Protocol January 2010 Proposal Presentation Protocol Due to large number of presentations, we will need to be very strict on time keeping Start time of presentations will be fixed in agenda by special order Presenters need to plan for Q&A as part of their time allocation Additional questions beyond time allocation can be directed to presenter offline in person or by email or on conference calls Strawpoll all proposals at the last TGad time slot of the session Prior agreement to standard strawpoll template to minimize questions about the strawpoll language to reduce the time Authors to provide chair with composed strawpoll in advance Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Standard Strawpoll Templates January 2010 Standard Strawpoll Templates “Do you support inclusion of the technique, [list technique] as described in 10/YYYYrZ in the TGad draft amendment?” “Do you support adopting the complete proposal in 10/YYYYrZ as the first draft of the TGad amendment?” Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Goals for March New Technique Proposal Presentations April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Goals for March New Technique Proposal Presentations Continue working on task group documents, channel model enterprise cubicle model Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Conference call times Not overlap with TGac Feb 25 March 4 April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Conference call times Not overlap with TGac Feb 25 10:00-12:00 ET Channel model March 4 EVM, coex Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Presentations for Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Presentations for Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 11-10/27r0, 60 GHz in-cabin environment, Alexis Paolo Garcia Ariza Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0 January 2010 Notes for Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 110/27r0 Should aircraft in-cabin channel model be considered as optional model in the TGad Channel Model document? Y: 3 N: 10 A: 38 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Presentations for Tuesday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 January 2010 Presentations for Tuesday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 09/1160r3, update on coexistence evaluation methodology, John Barr 10/0067r0, TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations, Minyoung Park 10/0046r0, Enhancements to Evaluation Methodology targeting handheld devices, Avinash Jain 09/0296r13, Update to evaluation methodology document, Eldad Perahia Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Notes for Tuesday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 January 2010 Notes for Tuesday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 Strawpoll Do you support adding the interference model described in 10/0067r0 to replace the corresponding TBDs in the TGad Evaluation Methodology document? Y:44, N:4, A:6 Do you support modifying the conference room simulation scenario in the TGad Evaluation Methodology document as described in 10/0046r0? Y: 50, N:1, A:10 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Presentations for Tuesday Jan 19th, 19:30 – 21:30 January 2010 Presentations for Tuesday Jan 19th, 19:30 – 21:30 10/0090r0, Human Body Blockage, Martin Jacob 10/0112r0, intra-cluster channel model for TGad channel modeling, Hirokazu Sawada 10/0133r0, Channel model update, Alexander Maltsev Time permitting, evaluation methodology doc update Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Presentations for Wed Jan 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 January 2010 Presentations for Wed Jan 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 09/935r5, update to selection procedure, Matt Fischer 09/334rX, Update to Channel Model document, Alexander Maltsev 10/0149r0, Proposed evaluation methodology addition, Shu Kato Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Notes for Wed Jan 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 Strawpoll January 2010 Notes for Wed Jan 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 Strawpoll Do you support adding the coexistence language described in 10/0149r0 (with grammar corrected) in the TGad Evaluation Methodology document? Y: 77, N: 0, A: 0 Agenda modified to run motions on Wed Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 Motion Move to adopt 09/0935r5 as the first draft of the TGad selection procedure document Mover: Vinko Seconder: Shu Kato Yes: 64 No: 1 Abs: 0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 Motion Move to adopt 09/0334r6 as the first draft of the TGad channel model document Mover: Alexander Seconder: Shu Kato Yes: 67 No: 1 Abs: 0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

January 2010 Motion Move to adopt 09/0296r16 as the first draft of the TGad evaluation methodology document Mover: Shu Kato Seconder: Brian Hart Yes: 65 No: 1 Abs: 0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation