Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages e20 (January 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic Evaluation of Cancer Screening - Case of Colorectal Cancer – Cost-Effectiveness analysis of stool DNA to Screen for Colorectal Cancer October.
Advertisements

Decision Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests by Age to Begin, Age to End, and Screening Intervals: Report to the United States Preventive Services.
Modeling Efforts to Inform Countries’ Screening Decisions Ann Graham Zauber, Iris Vogelaar, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Deb Schrag, Rob Boer, Dik Habbema,
Genetic testing for high-risk colon cancer patients1 William M. Grady Gastroenterology Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (May 2003) DOI: /S (03)
Date of download: 6/27/2016 From: Should Colorectal Cancer Screening Be Considered in Elderly Persons Without Previous Screening?: A Cost-Effectiveness.
Sessile Serrated Adenomas: An Evidence-Based Guide to Management
The Value of a 24/7 Online Nationwide Multidisciplinary Expert Panel for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis  Janneke van Grinsven, Sandra van Brunschot  Gastroenterology 
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2014)
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease for Barrett’s Esophagus With a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device 
Reply Gastroenterology
Volume 152, Issue 8, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Sessile Serrated Adenomas: An Evidence-Based Guide to Management
Volume 154, Issue 3, Pages e18 (February 2018)
The Value of a 24/7 Online Nationwide Multidisciplinary Expert Panel for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis  Janneke van Grinsven, Sandra van Brunschot  Gastroenterology 
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2014)
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2009)
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2011)
Katsunori Matsueda, Tatsuya Toyokawa 
Ira J. Fox, Stephen C. Strom  Gastroenterology 
Cause-Specific Mortality of People With Barrett's Esophagus Compared With the General Population: A Population-Based Cohort Study  Masoud Solaymani–Dodaran,
Volume 152, Issue 6, Pages (May 2017)
Making Sense of HDAC2 Mutations in Colon Cancer
Decrease in Incidence of Colorectal Cancer Among Individuals 50 Years or Older After Recommendations for Population-based Screening  Caitlin C. Murphy,
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2017)
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia  Uri Ladabaum, Ajitha Mannalithara 
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2013)
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages e2 (May 2010)
Sang Pyo Lee, Hang Lak Lee, Kang Nyeong Lee  Gastroenterology 
Volume 155, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages e1 (November 2015)
Amnon Sonnenberg, MD, MSc, Brent Y. Lee, MD 
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages e16-e17 (September 2017)
Volume 150, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 154, Issue 4, Pages e7 (March 2018)
Volume 141, Issue 1, Pages e23-e26 (July 2011)
Volume 151, Issue 5, Pages e3 (November 2016)
Cesare Hassan, Perry J. Pickhardt, Douglas K. Rex 
Reply Gastroenterology
Yock Young Dan, Benjamin Y.S. Chuah, Dean C.S. Koh, Khay Guan Yeoh 
Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar,
When Should Screening Stop for Elderly Individuals at Average and Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer?  Folasade P. May, Samir Gupta  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Cost Effectiveness of Universal Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Era of Direct-Acting, Pangenotypic Treatment Regimens  Mark H. Eckman,
Impact of New Hepatitis C Treatments in Different Regions of the World
Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Consensus Recommendations
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2018)
Relationship Between Detection of Adenomas by Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and Interval Distal Colorectal Cancer  Shari S. Rogal, Paul F. Pinsky, Robert E.
Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages e11 (January 2019)
Coffee and Colorectal Cancer: Grounds for Prevention?
Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Challenges in Identifying, Counseling, and Managing High-Risk Patients  Elena M. Stoffel, Anu Chittenden 
Volume 150, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Hashem El–Serag, Anna S.F. Lok, David L. Thomas  Gastroenterology 
Swati G. Patel, Dennis J. Ahnen 
Health Benefits and Cost-effectiveness of a Hybrid Screening Strategy for Colorectal Cancer  Tuan Dinh, Uri Ladabaum, Peter Alperin, Cindy Caldwell, Robert.
Amnon Sonnenberg  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2019)
Caitlin C. Murphy, Kristin Wallace, Robert S. Sandler, John A. Baron 
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Colorectal Cancer Screening: How to Stop a Moving Target
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2018)
Volume 149, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2015)
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Changing of the Guards: 2011–2016 Gastroenterology Team
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (March 2019)
Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, Lars Tue Sørensen, Torben Jørgensen 
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2010)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (May 2010)
Projected National Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening on Clinical and Economic Outcomes and Health Services Demand  Uri Ladabaum, Kenneth Song  Gastroenterology 
Racial and Ethnic Variations in the Effects of Family History of Colorectal Cancer on Screening Compliance  Molly Perencevich, Rohit P. Ojha, Ewout W.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages 105-116.e20 (January 2018) Cost Effectiveness of Age-Specific Screening Intervals for People With Family Histories of Colorectal Cancer  Steffie K. Naber, Karen M. Kuntz, Nora B. Henrikson, Marc S. Williams, Ned Calonge, Katrina A.B. Goddard, Doris T. Zallen, Theodore G. Ganiats, Elizabeth M. Webber, A. Cecile J.W. Janssens, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Ann G. Zauber, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar  Gastroenterology  Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages 105-116.e20 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021 Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequential optimization method, for an example of individuals with 1 affected FDR (corresponds with the first row in Table 4). First, the optimal start age and interval for the youngest cohort (30 year olds) is determined. The resulting screening ages between ages 30 and 44 are assumed as prior screening for the 45 year olds, for whom the screening interval from age 45 is optimized. The screening ages until age 49 are then incorporated in the prior screening for 50 year olds, and so on. For 70 year olds, the optimal end age of screening is determined. In the figure, the derivation of an optimal screening strategy is given in these subsequent steps (indicated by the black arrows). Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Model Appendix Figure 1 An overview of the natural history module of the general MISCAN-Colon model. In the general MISCAN-Colon model, sessile serrated polyps are modeled as part of the same pathway to cancer as adenomas. In the expanded MISCAN-Colon model, which was used in 2 of the sensitivity analyses, sessile serrated polyps are modeled as a separate pathway to cancer. The pathways have the same structure of disease stages, but sessile serrated polyps have longer dwelling times and are distributed differently than conventional adenomas. Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Model Appendix Figure 2 Adenoma prevalence observed in selected autopsy studies vs simulated by MISCAN-Colon (% of individuals with adenomas).* Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Model Appendix Figure 3 CRC incidence observed before the introduction of screening vs simulated by MISCAN-Colon (total (A), stage I CRC (B), stage II CRC (C), stage III CRC (D), stage IV CRC (E); cases per 100,000 person years). Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Model Appendix Figure 4 Distal CRC incidence observed in the intervention group of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial vs simulated by MISCAN-Colon (per year of follow-up (A), cumulative (B); cases per 100,000 person years). Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Model Appendix Figure 5 Integrating modules: two example patients (A and B). Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Figure 1 Cost-efficiency frontiers for people with 1 affected FDR, by age. The costs, health effects, and ICER of every strategy in the figure can be found in Supplementary Tables 1a-1g. If the same symbols appear in a single frontier, strategies begin or end at different ages (see the Supplementary Tables for the exact strategies). Strategies that are cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained are marked with a red circle. Gastroenterology 2018 154, 105-116.e20DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021) Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions