Overview of Mitigation Banking Program December 10, 2009 Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 WETLANDS RESERVE PROGRAM (WRP). Slide 2 WRP Key Points Restore and protect functions/values of wetlands in ag landscape Optimize wildlife habitat.
Advertisements

Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
Native Vegetation Act operation in practice and biodiversity protection in fire prone areas Craig Whisson Department of Water Land and Biodiversity Conservation.
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
Ag Wetland Banking A Win-Win Opportunity for MN Les Lemm Wetland Conservation Act Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources January 18, 2012.
AACC Compatible Land Use Planning Series Series Includes Presentations from: FAA Airports Division – March 10 AACC Meeting Planning Department, Municipality.
Emerging Law and Regulations Affecting Mitigation Banking Wayne E
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL. Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office (208)
Moving to the Next Level of Water Use Efficiency in Florida Janet G. Llewellyn, Director Division of Water Resource Management Florida Department of Environmental.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mitigation in a Modern World or 33 CFR 332 and You Presented by Jayson M Hudson To the Texas Association of Environmental Professionals.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
KEY CONCEPTS OF MITIGATION BANKING March 27, 2003 US Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District.
2014 Federal Farm Bill Overview 3/14/14. Conservation Compliance 2 “Recoupling” federal crop insurance premium support benefits to HEL and wetland conservation.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
National, State and Local Funding Sources for Conservation Easements Montana Association of Land Trusts Montana Conservation Easement Conference for Financial,
1 Wetland Regulatory Programs Department of Natural Resources Legislative Audit Bureau July 2007.
SFWMD Western Beltway Mitigation. Outline 1.Background 2.Mitigation Plan / Options 3.Future Projects / Available Funding Plants observed in Shingle Creek.
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Tourism Planning Lecture 3.
Rule 62-40, F.A.C. – What is it? The Water Resource Implementation Rule (State Water Policy). Required by Sec , F.S. Goals, objectives and guidance.
Watershed Protection & CodeNEXT Austin Neighborhoods Council March 25, 2015 Watershed Protection & CodeNEXT Austin Neighborhoods Council March 25, 2015.
Lake Apopka Restoration Proposed projects for Legislative Appropriation.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Agriculture Master Plan. 12:45 – 1:15 Overview of Community Workshop + Survey 1:15 - 2:30 Plan Recommendation review 2:45 – 3:45 Land Use Bylaw review.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation CORAL REEF CONSERVATION FUND Program Overview.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Florida’s Unified Stormwater Rule Status Lake Okeechobee WRAC November 2007 FDEP, Chad Kennedy Presenting for Eric Livingston and Michael Bateman.
A Vision for the Future Presented to the North Bay Watershed Association by the Sonoma County Water Agency and Zone 7 Water Agency.
August 2013 Coastal Incentive Grant Program Cycle 17 Highlights Planning for Cycle 18 Coastal Advisory Council Annual Meeting July 31, 2014 Georgia Department.
Sustaining Michigan’s Wetlands: Mitigation, Conservation Easements, and No Net Loss Andrew T. Kozich MTU School of Forest Resources & Environmental Science.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
2006 Water Bond & the WRIF Flood Control, Water Reliability, and Water Quality Peer Swan Director, Southern California Water Agency.
1 Food, Conservation and Energy Act of Information on NRCS Conservation Programs EQIP-Environmental Quality Incentives Program WHIP-Wildlife Habitat.
Michigan Commission of Agriculture September 16, 2009 Climate Change and the Farm.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
California Department of Fish and Game Conservation and Mitigation Banking Program Update by Cara Roderick Statewide Banking Coordinator 6/29/2010.
Tar-Pamlico Watershed Planning Survey Results And suggested next steps…
Land Stewardship Program 10 Year Strategic Plan. Manages District natural areas, protect lands and mitigation banks through: Enhancement Enhancement Restoration.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.
Maryland Water Quality Trading Committee Role of Aggregator George Kelly Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC February 22, 2015.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
BOR Real Property Conveyances and Restrictions Anita Bain, Director Natural Resource Management Division August 18, 2006 Anita Bain, Director Natural.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
Kurt Stephenson Virginia Tech December 2016
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Our Mission We work with landowners, communities, and organizations to protect lakes and rivers through developing effective, transferable, long-term solutions.
Reclaimed Water Funding
Of wetland mitigation sites constructed in the U.P.
Wetland Mitigation.
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Mitigation Banking Program December 10, 2009 Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Marjorie Moore, Lead Scientist Land Stewardship Division Marjorie Moore, Lead Scientist Land Stewardship Division

Regulatory Criteria Pertaining to Mitigation Banks Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department

In 1993, the Florida Legislature directed the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Water Management Districts to adopt rules governing the creation and use of mitigation banks: The permitting of the mitigation bank itself, and The use of mitigation banks by applicants to offset wetland impacts. Mitigation Bank Legislative Intent

Promoted the consolidation of mitigation into larger areas to provide long-term, sustainable, regional ecological benefits: Minimize uncertainty Greater assurance of mitigation success Optimize opportunities to restore degraded habitats

Mitigation Bank Legislative Intent Promoted the consolidation of mitigation into larger areas to provide long-term, sustainable, regional ecological benefits: Minimize uncertainty Greater assurance of mitigation success Optimize opportunities to restore degraded habitats

Bad mitigation photos

Criteria for Establishing a Mitigation Bank A proposed mitigation bank must demonstrate: a) Improve ecological conditions of the regional watershed; b) Provide viable and sustainable ecological and hydrological functions for the mitigation service area; c) Be effectively managed in the long-term; d) Not destroy areas with high ecological value; e) Achieve mitigation success; and f) Be adjacent to lands which will not affect the long- term viability and the Mitigation Bank.

What does an ERP for a Mitigation Bank Authorize? A Mitigation Bank Permit grants state authorization and approval on: Design plans, criteria and specifications for activities intended to increase the ecological value of the site; Sequence and schedule of approved activities; Plan goals and criteria established to measure their achievement; The Mitigation Bank Service Area; The value of the activities and the amount of credits that the project may earn; and The schedule for completion of the activities and release of the credits.

What is a Mitigation Bank Service Area (MBSA)? Geographic area where a wetland impact may be mitigated District establishes MBSA when bank is permitted Located within a MBSA does not automatically imply that bank is sufficient or appropriate to offset wetland impacts MBSA may fall within more than one Water Management District and/or include more than one bank. Mitigation Bank - A Mitigation Bank - B Impact

Use of a Mitigation Bank Use of a Mitigation Bank is appropriate, desirable and a permittable mitigation option when the Mitigation Bank will offset adverse impacts of the project; and a) Onsite mitigation opportunities are not expected to have comparable long-term viability due to factors such as unsuitable hydrologic conditions or ecologically incompatible existing adjacent land uses or future land uses; or b) Use of the Mitigation Bank would provide greater improvement in ecological value than on-site mitigation.

Credit System A mitigation credit is a standard unit of measure which represents the increase in ecological value resulting from restoration, enhancement, preservation or creation activities. For purposes of establishing a standard unit of measure, one mitigation credit is equivalent to the ecological value gained by the successful creation of one acre of wetland. Credits represent various habitat types and are titled to distinguish their type (i.e., freshwater forested, freshwater herbaceous, saltwater, mangrove, etc.).

Credit System (Contd) The banker, not the District, sets the price of credits. Based on an informal survey the Water Management Districts and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, credits have sold for prices ranging from $30,000 (in southern SJRWMD) to $145,000 (in northern SFWMD). The District does not direct applicants to a specific bank or mitigation option

PERMITTED MITIGATION BANKS AND SERVICE AREAS

Questions

Districts Proprietary Role in Mitigation Banking Marjorie Moore, Lead Scientist Land Stewardship Division Marjorie Moore, Lead Scientist Land Stewardship Division

27 Chapter Mitigation Banks: enhance mitigation certainty provide ecological value consolidate expertise and mitigation in one area WMDs directed to participate in and encourage private and public mitigation banks

28 DEP/SFWMD Joint Rulemaking Effort Encouraged each WMD to develop two mitigation banks District launched its mitigation banking program in January 1995 Until 2005 SFWMD only wmd establishing banks

29 Site Selection Criteria Demand Adjacency Wildlife Habitat Credit Gain Ease of Acquisition

30 Site Selection

31 Hydrologic Features

32 Photo Timeline Year 5Year 4Year 3Year 2Year 1

33 Challenges of Mitigation Banking Growing pains Investment of time and $$$ Policy issue of banks on public lands Real estate issues Adjacent land use issues Issue of SFWMD as regulator and banker

34 Public-Private Contract Banker: Permits the project Restores the land Markets/sells credits Establishes a long-term management fund Provides a revenue stream to SFWMD District: Acquires real estate, file conservation easement Assists banker through process Assumes long-term mgmt

35 Mitigation Banks Dollars and Sense Loxahatchee Corkscrew