Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2 – PART III POST-HOC TESTS. POST HOC TESTS When we get a significant F test result in an ANOVA test for a main effect of a factor with more than.
Advertisements

One-Way BG ANOVA Andrew Ainsworth Psy 420. Topics Analysis with more than 2 levels Deviation, Computation, Regression, Unequal Samples Specific Comparisons.
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance.
One-Way ANOVA Multiple Comparisons.
POST HOC COMPARISONS A significant F in ANOVA tells you only that there is a difference among the groups, not which groups are different. Post hoc tests.
More on ANOVA. Overview ANOVA as Regression Comparison Methods.
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
Comparing Means.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Computing the analysis of variance for simple experiments (single factor, unrelated groups experiments).
If = 10 and = 0.05 per experiment = 0.5 Type I Error Rates I.Per Comparison II.Per Experiment (frequency) = error rate of any comparison = # of comparisons.
Chapter 12 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Quantitative Methods in HPELS 440:210.
Part IV Significantly Different: Using Inferential Statistics
Repeated Measures ANOVA
1 Multiple Comparison Procedures Once we reject H 0 :   =   =...  c in favor of H 1 : NOT all  ’s are equal, we don’t yet know the way in which.
Chapter 11 HYPOTHESIS TESTING USING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Post Hoc Tests. What is a Post Hoc Test? Review: – Adjusting Alpha Level – Multiple A Priori Comparisons What makes a test Post Hoc? – Many tests could.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2013 Tuesday, October 15, 2013 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Educational Research Chapter 13 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10 th Edition.
One-way ANOVA: - Comparing the means IPS chapter 12.2 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Linear Models One-Way ANOVA. 2 A researcher is interested in the effect of irrigation on fruit production by raspberry plants. The researcher has determined.
Chapter 13 For Explaining Psychological Statistics, 4th ed. by B. Cohen 1 Chapter 13: Multiple Comparisons Experimentwise Alpha (α EW ) –The probability.
Remember You just invented a “magic math pill” that will increase test scores. On the day of the first test you give the pill to 4 subjects. When these.
Introduction to ANOVA Research Designs for ANOVAs Type I Error and Multiple Hypothesis Tests The Logic of ANOVA ANOVA vocabulary, notation, and formulas.
Jump to first page Inferring Sample Findings to the Population and Testing for Differences.
Formula for Linear Regression y = bx + a Y variable plotted on vertical axis. X variable plotted on horizontal axis. Slope or the change in y for every.
Educational Research Inferential Statistics Chapter th Chapter 12- 8th Gay and Airasian.
Posthoc Comparisons finding the differences. Statistical Significance What does a statistically significant F statistic, in a Oneway ANOVA, tell us? What.
Six Easy Steps for an ANOVA 1) State the hypothesis 2) Find the F-critical value 3) Calculate the F-value 4) Decision 5) Create the summary table 6) Put.
One-Way Between-Subjects Design and Analysis of Variance
Logic of Hypothesis Testing
SPSS Homework SPSS Homework 12.1 Practice Data from exercise ) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you.
Week 2 – PART III POST-HOC TESTS.
Why is this important? Requirement Understand research articles
Statistical Data Analysis - Lecture /04/03
Comparing several means: ANOVA (GLM 1)
Chapter 6 Making Sense of Statistical Significance: Decision Errors, Effect Size and Statistical Power Part 1: Sept. 24, 2013.
Comparing Three or More Means
Hypothesis testing using contrasts
Multiple Comparisons Q560: Experimental Methods in Cognitive Science Lecture 10.
Post Hoc Tests on One-Way ANOVA
Central Limit Theorem, z-tests, & t-tests
Planned Comparisons & Post Hoc Tests
Differences Among Group Means: One-Way Analysis of Variance
Comparing Multiple Groups: Analysis of Variance ANOVA (1-way)
1-Way ANOVA with Numeric Factor – Dose-Response
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Studentized Range Statistic
Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts
Comparing Several Means: ANOVA
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
I. Statistical Tests: Why do we use them? What do they involve?
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests
Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts
Comparing Means.
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance.
Inferential Statistics
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests
Analysis of Variance: repeated measures
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Conceptual Understanding
SPSS SPSS Problem (Part 1). SPSS SPSS Problem (Part 1)
Lis Tomlin, LMHC Using Acudetox to Reduce Stress in College Students: A Brief Intervention Strategy for College Counselors Lis Tomlin,
Post Hoc Tests.
Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance Difference Studentized Range Statistic Dunnett’s Test

Trend Analysis The logic of trend analysis is exactly the same logic we just talked about with contrasts!

Example You collect axon firing rate scores from rats in one of four conditions. Condition 1 = 10 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 2 = 20 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 3 = 30 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 4 = 40 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 5 = 50 mm of Zeta inhibitor You think Zeta inhibitor reduces the number of times an axon fires – are you right?

What does this tell you ?

Trend Analysis Contrast Codes! -2 -1 0 1 2

Trend Analysis

a1 = -2, a2 = -1, a3 = 0, a4 = 1, a5 = 2 L = 7.2 F crit (1, 20) = 4.35

Note

Example You place subjects into one of five different conditions of anxiety. 1) Low anxiety 2) Low-Moderate anxiety 3) Moderate anxiety 4) High-Moderate anxiety 5) High anxiety You think subjects will perform best on a test at level 3 (and will do worse at both lower and higher levels of anxiety)

What does this tell you ?

-2 1 2 1 -2 Contrast Codes!

Trend Analysis Create contrast codes that will examine a quadratic trend. -2, 1, 2, 1, -2

a1 = -2, a2 = 1, a3 = 2, a4 = 1, a5 = -2 L = 10 F crit (1, 20) = 4.35

Trend Analysis How do you know which numbers to use? Page 742

Linear (NO BENDS)

Quadratic (ONE BEND)

Cubic (TWO BENDS)

Practice You believe a balance between school and one’s social life is the key to happiness. Therefore you hypothesize that people who focus too much on school (i.e., people who get good grades) and people who focus too much on their social life (i.e., people who get bad grades) will be more depressed. You collect data from 25 subjects 5 subjects = F 5 subjects = D 5 subjects = C 5 subjects = B 5 subjects = A You measured their depression

Practice Below are your findings – interpret!

Trend Analysis Create contrast codes that will examine a quadratic trend. -2, 1, 2, 1, -2

a1 = -2, a2 = 1, a3 = 2, a4 = 1, a5 = -2 L = -12.8 F crit (1, 20) = 4.35

Remember Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior Measure Happiness (1-100)

ANOVA Traditional F test just tells you not all the means are equal Does not tell you which means are different from other means

Why not Do t-tests for all pairs Fresh vs. Sophomore Fresh vs. Junior Fresh vs. Senior Sophomore vs. Junior Sophomore vs. Senior Junior vs. Senior

Problem What if there were more than four groups? Probability of a Type 1 error increases. Maximum value = comparisons (.05) 6 (.05) = .30

Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance Difference Studentized Range Statistic Dunnett’s Test

Bonferoni t Controls for Type I error by using a more conservative alpha

Do t-tests for all pairs Fresh vs. Sophomore Fresh vs. Junior Fresh vs. Senior Sophomore vs. Junior Sophomore vs. Senior Junior vs. Senior

Maximum probability of a Type I error 6 (.05) = .30 But what if we use Alpha = .05/C .00833 = .05 / 6 6 (.00855) = .05

t-table Compute the t-value the exact same way Problem: normal t table does not have these p values Test for significance using the Bonferroni t table (page 751)

Practice

Practice Fresh vs. Sophomore t = .69 Fresh vs. Junior t = 2.41 Fresh vs. Senior t = -1.55 Sophomore vs. Junior t = 1.72 Sophomore vs. Senior t = -2.24 Junior vs. Senior t = -3.97* Critical t = 6 comp/ df = 20 = 2.93

Bonferoni t Problem Silly What should you use as the value in C? Increases the chances of the Type II error!

Practice Data from exercise 11.1 1) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you had no hypotheses and you were concerned about Type 1 error. Compare all conditions to each other using Bonferroni’s t. 5 days vs 20 days 5 days vs 35 days 20 days vs 35 days

Practice 1) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days F(1,15) = 4.54

Practice 2) Imagine you had no hypotheses and you were concerned about Type 1 error. Compute all possible t-tests using Bonferroni’s t. 5 vs 20 Bonferroni t critical 3 comp, df = 15 2.69 5 vs 35 20 vs 35

Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance Difference Studentized Range Statistic Dunnett’s Test

Fisher Least Significance Difference Simple 1) Do a normal omnibus ANOVA 2) If there it is significant you know that there is a difference somewhere! 3) Do individual t-test to determine where significance is located

Fisher Least Significance Difference Problem You may have an ANOVA that is not significant and still have results that occur in a manner that you predict! If you used this method you would not have “permission” to look for these effects.

Remember

Remember

Studentized Range Statistic Which groups would you likely select to determine if they are different?

Studentized Range Statistic Which groups would you likely select to determine if they are different? This statistics controls for Type I error if (after looking at the data) you select the two means that are most different.

Studentized Range Statistic Easy! 1) Do a normal t-test

Studentized Range Statistic Easy! 2) Convert the t to a q

Studentized Range Statistic 3) Critical value of q (note: this is a two-tailed test) Figure out df (same as t) Example = 20 Figure out r r = the number of groups

Studentized Range Statistic 3) Critical value of q (note: this is a two-tailed test) Figure out df (same as t) Example = 20 Figure out r r = the number of groups Example = 4

Studentized Range Statistic 3) Critical value of q Page 744 Example q critical = +/- 3.96

Studentized Range Statistic 4) Compare q obs and q critical same way as t values q = -5.61 q critical = +/– 3.96

Practice You collect axon firing rate scores from rates in one of four conditions. Condition 1 = 10 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 2 = 20 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 3 = 30 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 4 = 40 mm of Zeta inhibitor Condition 5 = 50 mm of Zeta inhibitor You are simply interested in determining if any two groups are different from each other – use the Studentized Range Statistic

Studentized Range Statistic Easy! 1) Do a normal t-test

Studentized Range Statistic Easy! 2) Convert the t to a q

Studentized Range Statistic 3) Critical value of qnote: this is a two-tailed test) Figure out df (same as t) Example = 20 Figure out r r = the number of groups Example = 5

Studentized Range Statistic 3) Critical value of q Page 744 Example q critical = +/- 4.23

Studentized Range Statistic 4) Compare q obs and q critical same way as t values q = -4.34 q critical = +/– 4.23

Dunnett’s Test Used when there are several experimental groups and one control group (or one reference group) Example: Effect of psychotherapy on happiness Group 1) Psychoanalytic Group 2) Humanistic Group 3) Behaviorism Group 4) Control (no therapy)

Psyana vs. Control Human vs. Control Behavior vs. Control

Psyana vs. Control = 47.8 – 51.4 = -3.6 Human vs. Control = 50.8 – 51. 4 = -0.6 Behavior vs. Control = 59 – 51.4 = 7.6

Psyana vs. Control = 47.8 – 51.4 = -3.6 Human vs. Control = 50.8 – 51. 4 = -0.6 Behavior vs. Control = 59 – 51.4 = 7.6 How different do these means need to be in order to reach significance?

Dunnett’s t is on page 753 df = Within groups df / k = number of groups

Dunnett’s t is on page 753 df = 16 / k = 4

Dunnett’s t is on page 753 df = 16 / k = 4

Psyana vs. Control = 47.8 – 51.4 = -3.6 Human vs. Control = 50.8 – 51. 4 = -0.6 Behavior vs. Control = 59 – 51.4 = 7.6* How different do these means need to be in order to reach significance?

Practice As a graduate student you wonder what undergraduate students (freshman, sophomore, etc.) have different levels of happiness then you.

Dunnett’s t is on page 753 df = 25 / k = 5

Fresh vs. Grad = -17.5* Soph vs. Grad = -21.5* Jun vs. Grad = -31.5* Senior vs. Grad = -8.5