Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, Clifton T. P. Lewis, MD, Marc P

Advertisements

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical complications: Summary assessment of.

Max B. Mitchell, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Survival Benefit of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Ejection Fraction And Low Gradient With Normal Ejection.

Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,

An unusual case of severe aortic valve stenosis in an adult caused by aortic valve inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor Dong Zhao, MD, Chunsheng Wang,

Early mitral valve surgery for chronic severe mitral regurgitation optimizes left ventricular performance and left ventricular mass regression Ken-ichi.

Successful surgical treatment of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation achieves left ventricular reverse remodeling but does not affect right ventricular.

Harald C. Eichstaedt, MD, Jerry Easo, MD, Tobias Härle, MD, Otto E

Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis Evaldas Girdauskas,

Long-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age Torsten Christ,

Pulmonary vein stenosis: Challenges ahead

Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration

Abracadabra I, II…HeartMate 3?

Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD

Functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair is a true anatomic problem that originates from the time of surgery Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, Thierry.

Paul Modi, FRCS, Ansar Hassan, MD, PhD, W. Randolph Chitwood, MD

Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?

Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,

Jong Hun Kim, MD, Jong Bum Choi, MD

The lord of the rings Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD

The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology

Does the degree of preoperative mitral regurgitation predict survival or the need for mitral valve repair or replacement in patients with anomalous origin.

Long-term outcome of patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support Koji Takeda, MD, PhD, Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD, Bindu Kalesan,

Support Your Specialty

John A. Elefteriades, MD, PhD (hon), Bulat A. Ziganshin, MD, PhD

W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, Clifton T. P. Lewis, MD, Marc P

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients

Innovation and science: The future of valve design

The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery Vinay Badhwar, MD The Journal of Thoracic and.

Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD

Effect of the prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A prospective observational.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,

Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD

Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005 Scott D. Barnett, PhD,

Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization after biologic and mechanical aortic valve replacement: Investigation with multirange and multifrequency.

Christopher M. Feindel, MD, MSc, Maral Ouzounian, MD, PhD

Posterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: One repair does not fit all

Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD

Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve

Early Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes After Stented and Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial Ayyaz Ali, MRCS,

Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Sutureless valve implantation: Every detail counts

Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations

Role of transvalvular gradient in outcome from valve replacement for aortic stenosis Arjuna Weerasinghe, FRCS, PhD, Merangani Yusuf, FRCS, Thanos Athanasiou,

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD

Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some

The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956 Richard A. DeWall, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Guidance for the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries according to survival benefit across age groups Umberto Benedetto, MD, PhD, Mohamed Amrani,

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Severe tricuspid or mitral regurgitation in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. Can we leave them alone? Juan A. Crestanello, MD The Journal of.

The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide

Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable Craig M. Jarrett,

Commentary: When a choice is not an echo

Between a rock and a hard place

Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement Todd M. Dewey,

Vinay Badhwar, MD, John S. Ikonomidis, MD, PhD, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, MD

“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead

Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out Glen B. Taksler, PhD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Lessons from the first patient to undergo full aortic root replacement using a homograft: A 29-year follow-up Sajiram Sarvananthan, MBBS, Giovanni Melina,

How do we follow up our patients

Thanos Sioris, MD, Tirone E

Designing valves: An art or science?

Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location” Kevin L. Greason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Paul Philipp Heinisch, MD, Thierry Carrel, MD

Presentation transcript:

Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival Ayyaz Ali, MRCS, Amit Patel, MBBS, Ziad Ali, MRCS, MRCP, PhD, Yasir Abu-Omar, MRCS, Amber Saeed, MD, Thanos Athanasiou, PhD, FETCS, John Pepper, FRCS The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages 285-291 (August 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.084 Copyright © 2011 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (A), transvalvular gradient (B), and ejection fraction (EF) (C) during follow-up in patients groups with different degree of left ventricular mass (LVM) regression The P value for the different LVM groups (vertical axis) has been calculated by analysis of covariance and the P values for different time points (horizontal axis) are from the Bonferroni test. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 285-291DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.084) Copyright © 2011 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Actuarial survival according to left ventricular mass (LVM) reduction at 1 year of follow-up. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 285-291DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.084) Copyright © 2011 Terms and Conditions