Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Eligibility Criteria Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Advertisements

Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Protocol Development.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
Cardiovascular outcome in patients with dysglycemia with daily supplementation of n-3 fatty acids 1 ORIGIN trial (Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine.
When To Select Observational Studies as Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.
Analytic Frameworks Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
STUDY PLANNING & DESIGN TO ENHANCE TRANSLATION OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR RESEARCH Lisa Klesges, Russell Glasgow, Paul Estabrooks, David Dzewaltowski, Sheana Bull.
Systematic Review of the Literature: A Novel Research Approach.
Exercise Prescription Project Department of Health.
Exposure Definition and Measurement in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Systematic Review Module 2: Analytic Frameworks Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor,
Criteria to assess quality of observational studies evaluating the incidence, prevalence, and risk factors of chronic diseases Minnesota EPC Clinical Epidemiology.
Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
Advancing Excellence in Health Care Perinatal Depression: Prevalence, Screening, Accuracy and Screening Outcomes Susan F. Meikle, M.D., M.S.P.H. Senior.
Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Presentation of Findings Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Systematic Review Module 3: Study Eligibility Criteria Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Study Eligibility Criteria: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Selecting Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Melissa McPheeters, PhD., MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice.
When to Select Observational Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: Dan Jonas, MD, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD Karen Crotty, PhD, MPH RTI-UNC Evidence-based.
Analytic Frameworks: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor, Institute.
Regionalizing Health Care: Volume Standards vs. Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rate Laurent G. Glance, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology This.
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Presentation of Findings: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Jeff Seroogy, BS Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center Joseph Lau,
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of the individual patient (Dr. David Sackett)
Quantitative Synthesis II Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
Systematic Review Krit Pongpirul, MD, MPH. Johns Hopkins University.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Problem Specification Abdel Moniem Mukhtar, Dr.P.H., MPH, BDS, Research Methodology Module, AUW on Septmember 2012.
Research Design Evidence Based Medicine Concepts and Glossary.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Assessing Applicability Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
1 Study Design Imre Janszky Faculty of Medicine, ISM NTNU.
Introduction to General Epidemiology (2) By: Dr. Khalid El Tohami.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Epidemiological Study Designs And Measures Of Risks (1)
Innovation Project Title
A quick reference to literature searches
A Foundation for Paul Grundy MD, MPH IBM Chief Medical Officer Director, Healthcare Transformation Healthcare Industry A Foundation.
Refining the Research question & Searching the literature
Present: Disease Past: Exposure
The scope and focus of the Research
Clinical Studies Continuum
Data Extraction Interactive Quiz
Creating a solid Nursing Research question
Randomized Trials: A Brief Overview
Towards More Sustainable Programming for Global Health Missions
Using PICO in Library Instruction for STEM Disciplines
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
VSAC and Quality Measures
NRS 410 RANK Experience Tradition / nrs410rank.com.
11/20/2018 Study Types.
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
کارگاه روش تحقیق Tolou Hasandokht MD
Things to Remember… PubMed
Writing Cochrane Protocol Cochrane Thailand Workshop 2017
EAST GRADE Course 2019 PICO Question Formulation
Overview of different types of reviews : Scoping Reviews, Rapid Reviews, Systematic Reviews Housne
Module 5: Formulating Research Questions
Module 4 Part 2 Selecting Measures
Chapter 15 Community As Client: Applying the Nursing Process
Emily Balmer Patient Activation Emily Balmer
Presentation transcript:

Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide www.ahrq.gov Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz This interactive quiz augments the module on study eligibility criteria. It was prepared by Melissa L. McPheeters, Ph.D., M.P.H., a member of the Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center. The module is currently not included in Version 1.0 of the Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ ehc/products/60/294/2009_0805_principles1.pdf).

PICOTS Components When selecting study eligibility study criteria, it is important to keep the PICOTS components in mind. What does PICOTS stand for? Personal, Interest, Comparison, Observation, Time, and Situation Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Setting Public, Individual, Community, Organization, Time, and Society None of the above PICOTS Components When selecting study eligibility criteria, it is important to keep the PICOTS components in mind. What does PICOTS stand for? Incorrect. PICOTS includes the important global ideas applicable to all phases of the review. Correct. PICOTS is an acronym that stands for: population (condition, disease severity and stage, comorbidities, patient demographics); intervention (dosage, frequency, and method of administration); comparators (placebo, usual care, or active control); outcomes (health outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life); timing (duration of followup); and setting (primary, specialty, inpatient, and cointerventions).

Study Eligibility Criteria N > 30 could be an example of study eligibility criteria. True False Study Eligibility Criteria N > 30 could be an example of study selection criteria. Correct. Other examples could include adult, community-dwelling females; study of a screening tool for depression; United States only; hospital-based studies only; N > 200; or randomized controlled trials. Incorrect. Selection criteria are the rules that dictate whether a study will be included or excluded.

When To Determine Study Eligibility Criteria Study eligibility criteria should be determined after the abstract review process is underway. True False When To Determine Study Eligibility Criteria Study eligibility criteria should be determined after the abstract review process is underway. Incorrect. Determining study eligibility criteria after reviewing literature may introduce bias and skew the results. Correct. To reduce bias, study eligibility criteria should be determined before any literature investigation. When determining study eligibility criteria, it is important to review study goals, assess the analytic framework and key questions, and tie criteria to the PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting) elements.

Well-Constructed Study Eligibility Criteria Using well-constructed study eligibility criteria can help avoid which of the following? Too much literature to feasibly review or disparate literature that cannot be compared Too little literature Inability to answer the intended question Bias introduced through inclusion of inappropriate study designs or populations All of the above Well-Constructed Selection Criteria Using well-constructed study eligibility criteria can help avoid which of the following? Correct, but there is a better answer. Options B, C, and D can also be avoided by using well-constructed study eligibility criteria. Correct, but there is a better answer. Options A, C, and D can also be avoided by using well-constructed study eligibility criteria. Correct, but there is a better answer. Options A, B, and D can also be avoided by using well-constructed study eligibility criteria. Correct, but there is a better answer. Options A, B, and C can also be avoided by using well-constructed study eligibility criteria. Correct. Study eligibility criteria are powerful tools for broadening or narrowing the scope of a review. When properly constructed and applied, study eligibility will reduce bias and enhance the applicability of the review.

Summary To reduce bias in a comparative effectiveness review, choose the study eligibility criteria before performing the literature review. Assess study goals. Appraise analytic framework and key questions. Tie the criteria to PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting). Study eligibility criteria can broaden or narrow the scope of the review. When properly applied, study eligibility criteria will enhance applicability of the review. Summary

Author This quiz was prepared by Melissa L. McPheeters, Ph.D., M.P.H., a member of the Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center. The information in this module is currently not included in Version 1.0 of the Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare. ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/294/2009_0805_principles1.pdf). Author This interactive quiz augments the module on study eligibility criteria. It was prepared by Melissa L. McPheeters, Ph.D., M.P.H., a member of the Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center. The module is currently not included in Version 1.0 of the Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ ehc/products/60/294/2009_0805_principles1.pdf).