Update of IFE Target Fabrication, Injection, and Tracking

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Volume Filling Neil Alexander, D. Goodin, R. Petzoldt, J. Hoffer*, A. Nobile*, A. Schwendt*, S. Willms* General Atomics Los Alamos National Laboratory*
Advertisements

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.
Initial Results from ARIES-IFE Study and Plans for the Coming Year Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team Heavy-ion IFE Meeting July 23-24, 2001 Lawrence.
September 24-25, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, UW, Madison 1 Report on Target Action Items A.R. Raffray and B. Christensen University of California, San Diego.
Welcome to the second “official” Laser IFE workshop Discuss our progress in Laser IFE Address some key issues as a group Oxidation of graphite walls Filling.
Thermal Control Techniques for Improved DT Layering of Indirect Drive IFE Targets John E. Pulsifer and Mark S. Tillack University of California, San Diego.
March 3-4, 2005 HAPL meeting, NRL 1 Target Survival During Injection…The Advantages of Getting Rid of the Buffer Gas Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors:
In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.
December 5-6, 2002 HAPL Program Workshop, NRL, Washington, D.C. 1 Enhancing Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: M. S. Tillack,
N. Alexander, P. Gobby, D. Goodin, J. Hoffer, J. Latkowski, A. Nobile, D. Petti, R. Petzoldt, A. Schwendt, W. Steckle, D. Sze, M. Tillack Presented by.
A. R. Raffray, B. R. Christensen and M. S. Tillack Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber? Japan-US Workshop on IFE Target Fabrication,
February 3-4, nd US/Japan Target Workshop, GA, San Diego, CA 1 Heating and Thermal Response of Direct- Drive Target During Injection Presented by.
November th TOFE, Washington, D.C. 1 Thermal Behavior and Operating Requirements of IFE Direct-Drive Targets A.R. Raffray 1, R. Petzoldt 2, J. Pulsifer.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Target Survival During Injection Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: K. Boehm, B. Christensen, M. S.
P. Gobby, A. Nobile, J. Hoffer, A. Schwendt and W. Steckle Concepts for Fabrication of Inertial Fusion Energy Targets.
Schafer Corporation An Employee-Owned Small Business Schafer Laboratories Division Office 448 Lindbergh Avenue Livermore, CA (Tel)
Schafer Corporation An Employee-Owned Small Business Schafer Laboratories Schafer Corporation at Sandia National Laboratory 1515 Eubank SE, M.S 1196 Albuquerque,
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
C. Adams, N. Alexander, R. Andrews, G. Besenbruch, D. Bittner, L. Brown, D. Callahan-Miller, T. Drake, F. Elsner, C. Gibson, M. Gouge, A. Greenwood, J.
1 THERMAL LOADING OF A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET IN RAREFIED GAS B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department.
A. Schwendt, A. Nobile, P. Gobby, W. Steckle Los Alamos National Laboratory D. T. Goodin, Neil Alexander, G. E. Besenbruch, K. R. Schultz General Atomics.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
Thermal Control Techniques for Improved DT Layering of Indirect Drive IFE Targets M.S. Tillack and J.E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego D.T.
February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Survivable Target Strategy and Analysis Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: B. Christensen, M. S.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.
IFE foam characterization Abbas Nikroo, Fred Elsner, Annette Greenwood High Z coatings for IFE applications Abbas Nikroo, Elizabeth Stephens, Ron Petzoldt,
A. Schwendt, A. Nobile, W. Steckle Los Alamos National Laboratory D. Colombant, J. Sethian Naval Research Laboratory D. T. Goodin, N. Alexander, G. E.
Update on Various Target Issues Presented by Ron Petzoldt D. Goodin, E. Valmianski, N. Alexander, J. Hoffer Livermore HAPL meeting June 20-21, 2005.
The High Average Power Laser Program in DOE/DP Coordinated, focussed, multi-lab effort to develop the science and technology for Laser Fusion Energy Coordinated,
Schafer Corporation An Employee-Owned Small Business Schafer Laboratories Schafer Corporation at Sandia National Laboratory 1515 Eubank SE, M.S 1196 Albuquerque,
The High Average Power Laser Program Coordinated, focussed, multi-lab effort to develop a rep-rate laser facility for Inertial Fusion Energy and DP needs.
Overview of GA Target Fabrication And Injection Tasks Presented by Dan Goodin at HAPL Project Review Pleasanton, California November 13-14, 2001.
Target Tracking, Tracking/Beam Steering Interface, and Target Fabrication Progress presented by Ron Petzoldt HAPL Project Review Atlanta, Georgia February.
Reducing the Costs of Targets for Inertial Fusion Energy G.E. Besenbruch, D.T. Goodin, J.P. Dahlburg, K.R. Schultz, A. Nobile 1, E.M. Campbell General.
LA-UR “Mini-Workshop” on Coordination of IFE Target Thermo-Mechanical Modeling and DT Ice Experiments LANL, UCSD, and General Atomics at Los Alamos.
Update on IFE Target Fabrication Progress presented by Dan Goodin HAPL Project Review Madison, Wisconsin September 24, 2003 N. Alexander. L. Brown, R.
Update on IFE Target Fabrication and Injection Activities Presented by Dan Goodin at the ARIES Project Meeting January 10-11, 2002 UCSD San Diego, California.
JES Divinylbenzene (DVB) Shells Meeting Specifications High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA February.
IFE Target Fabrication Update Presented by Jared Hund 1 N. Alexander 1, J. Bousquet 1, Bob Cook 1, S. Eddinger, D. Frey 1, D. Goodin 1, H. Huang, J. Karnes.
Some Thoughts on Phase II for Target fabrication, injection, and tracking presented by Dan Goodin Georgia Institute of Technology February 5th & 6th, 2004.
Laser IFE Program Workshop Naval Research Laboratory February 6 & 7, 2001 A. Nobile, J. Hoffer, A. Schwendt, W. Steckle, D. Goodin, G. Besenbruch and K.
Status of Target Injector and In-Chamber Tracking Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Neil Alexander, Gottfried Besenbruch, Tom Drake, Brian Vermillion, Bob Stemke,
The Plan to Develop Laser Fusion Energy John Sethian Naval Research Laboratory July 19, 2002.
DOE OFES/DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
Update on Mass Production Layering Presented by Amy Bozek at the HAPL Workshop at LLNL June 20-21, 2005 A. Bozek, N. Alexander, G. Flint, D. Goodin, R.
Gottfried Besenbruch, Lloyd Brown, Tom Drake, Peter Ebey, Jim Hoffer, Haibo Huang, Barry McQuillan, Farrokh Najmabadi, Abbas Nikroo, Art Nobile, Ron Petzoldt,
Top level overview of target fabrication tasks High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory October 27 and 28, 2004 Presented.
A. Schwendt, A. Nobile, P. Gobby, W. Steckle Los Alamos National Laboratory D. T. Goodin, G. E. Besenbruch, K. R. Schultz General Atomics Laser IFE Workshop.
WELCOME Fifth Laser IFE (HAPL) Program Workshop Naval Research Laboratory Dec 5 and 6, 2002.
C. Adams, N. Alexander, R. Andrews, G. Besenbruch, D. Bittner, L. Brown, D. Callahan-Miller, T. Drake, F. Elsner, C. Gibson, M. Gouge, A. Greenwood, J.
Materials Science and Technology: Condensed Matter and Thermal Physics Simulation of Direct Drive Target Injection into ‘Hot’ Chambers James K. Hoffer.
John Saurwein February 6-7, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory, Washington IFE Target Process and Characterization Methods Development and Target Manufacturing.
Integrated Target Reflectivity Analysis
Design of an Inertial Fusion Energy Target Injection & Tracking System Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Mike Hollins, Chuck Gibson, Neil Alexander, and Gottfried.
DOE DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
DOE DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
Progress on HAPL Foam Shell Overcoat Fabrication Presented by Jared Hund 1 N. Alexander 1, J. Bousquet 1, Bob Cook 1, D. Goodin 1, D. Jasion 1, R. Paguio.
Jeong-Jeung Dang, Kyoung-Jae Chung, Y. S. Hwang *
Skeleton contributions to targets section
Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber?
Palladium Coated Shells
IFE Wetted-Wall Chamber Engineering “Preliminary Considerations”
University of California, San Diego
Experimental equipment Edgar L. Black February 17, 2019
Target Technology Development in Support of NRL Laser Plasma Program
The 5-year Integrated Plan is built upon this logic diagram
Presentation transcript:

Update of IFE Target Fabrication, Injection, and Tracking N. Alexander, D. Goodin, J. Hoffer, J. Kaae, T.K. Mau, A. Nobile, R. Petzoldt, D. Schroen-Carey, A. Schwendt, W. Steckle, M. Tillack Presented by Dan Goodin March 8-9, 2001 Livermore, California

Target fabrication, injection, and tracking issues are being addressed in an integrated fashion Target fabrication critical issues 1) Ability to fabricate target materials 2) Ability to fabricate them economically 3) Ability to fabricate, assemble, fill and layer at required rates Target injection critical issues 4) Withstand acceleration during injection 5) Survive thermal environment 6) Accuracy and repeatability, tracking NRL Radiation Preheat Target A. Schmitt, NRL LLNL Close-Coupled HI Target …. Presentation will briefly address the work being done for each issue

Simplified Target Fab/Injection 5-Year Plan FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY2007 Target Injection IRE Plant Design Injection Accuracy and Tracking Upgrade to Cryo Cryo Data, Anal. and Modeling NRL Target Physics Target Baseline Design (NRL) Prel. Target Designs Target Analysis (Continuing) Target Fabrication IRE Plant Design Engineering Prototype Development Studies, R&D, Proof of Principle

1) Ability to fabricate target materials Leveraging ICF fabrication experience Indirect drive targets LANL is studying synthesis of metal doped organic foams Direct drive targets Schafer is developing DVB foam shells and seal coats GA is developing characterization Technical planning meeting at GA 2/21/01 (GA/Schafer/LANL) GA is depositing high-Z overcoat Trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate foam shell with ~1 m hydroxyethylcellulose seal coat plus GDP, with ~300 Angstroms of gold 10 mg/cc DVB foam (from Diana Schroen-Carey) …. Initial materials fabrication and evaluation programs for both direct and indirect drive IFE targets are underway.

1) Ability to fabricate target materials - high-Z overcoat Considerations: Target design (Z, smooth, uniform) Fabrication (ability to coat, cost) Layering (IR or Joule heating) Injection (stable, reflective) ES&H (hazardous, mixed waste) Permeation through gold could be too slow Current focus Coat 300 Angstrom gold & measure permeation Evaluate alternatives/backups Gold deposited with columnar structure or pinholes can be permeable …. Need to pursue baseline approach– but always have backups!

FLUIDIZED BED WITH GOLD PLATED (IR REFLECTING) INNER WALL 2) Ability to fabricate targets economically – utilizing industrial technologies Industrial technologies are being evaluated Fluidized bed is one mass-production technology Several runs for GDP coating have shown good results (GA) Can the concept be applied to cryogenic layering? (GA, Schafer) INJECT IR Fluidized Bed Concept for Layering FLUIDIZED BED WITH GOLD PLATED (IR REFLECTING) INNER WALL Coating Mandrel COLD HELIUM PAMS Mandrels in Fluidized Bed

2) Ability to fabricate targets economically – chemical process modeling and cost estimating Flowsheet prepared by LANL …. Scaleup of existing bench scale processes will be evaluated using chemical plant design software (Aspen Plus) …. Workshop on target fabrication facility equipment and cost estimates being planned (GA, LANL, LLNL, UCSD, …)

Large Batch Permeation 3) Ability to fabricate, assemble, fill, and layer at required rates – high volume filling Permeation filling is demonstrated technology from ICF Void volume reduction (LANL) LANL Calculations of Total DT Inventory for Direct Drive Targets Filled at 340K Large Batch Permeation Alternative fill techniques (GA) Direct injection of liquid DT Fast filled liquid target Direct Injection

Target injection critical issues Target injection is pursuing the Experimental Plan developed in FY99 “Experimental Plan for IFE Target Injection & Tracking”, GA-C23241 (Oct, 1999) Program is a combination of -analyses & modeling -materials property meas. -demonstrations …. Ultimate goal is demonstration of injecting cryogenic targets into hot chamber

4) Withstand acceleration during injection – materials measurements are needed Have estimated DT can withstand 1000g acceleration at 18K But based on hydrogen properties extrapolated in both isotope and in temperature Need to measure DT yield strength and modulus under representative conditions Correct crystalline form Function of temperature Function of time (3H -> 3He + ) Planning meeting at NRL February 7, 2001 GA, LANL, NRL, Schafer Reviewed objectives & requirements LANL is developing detailed measurement approach Ref: Krupskii, I.N., Soviet J. Low Temp. Phy. 3, 453, 1977

5) Survive the thermal environment – indirect drive target thermal calculations ANSYS finite element model for indirect drive target LLNL close coupled heavy ion driven target 30 ms acceleration with 300K surface temperature 30 ms coasting phase at 100 m/s 30 ms in-reactor phase assuming 930K and 90 reflectance Results show negligible DT heating during injection

5) Survive the thermal environment – direct drive target “success pathways” Heating due to thermal radiation and from conduction/convection from the chamber gas Criteria/concerns High reflectivity Permeation filling Target physics Wall damage Waste Materials Cost Complexity DT absorption CH absorption Target Physics Review Status and Plans Reflectivity Target Protection -Sabot in chamber -Injection Tube (UW) Target Survival Next Presentation (Alexander) “Survival” Criteria? Preliminary Calculations Transmission Experimental Data

5) Survive the thermal environment – heating of a highly reflective direct drive target Brief historical review: Thermal radiation heat flux from blackbody spectrum (98% reflectance) Convective heat flux with “corrected” Whitaker equations ANSYS model to estimate DT response Survival (Failure) criteria defined “At-risk” when yield stress is reached “Failure” assumed at triple point Need surface heat flux <1 W/cm2 DSMC code utilized for more accurate convective heating calculations Conclusion: Reference SOMBRERO conditions unusable 1485°C

ANSYS Flotran Calculations 5) Survive the thermal environment – direct drive targets have a design window Excessive heating Asymmetric heating ANSYS Flotran Calculations Lower first wall temperatures Lower gas pressures Assumes 98% target surface reflectivity

5) Survive the thermal environment – removing the chamber gas widens the “window” Conclusions: 1) Analyses of target heating are well in-hand 2) Most important issues are: - Response of the DT to rapid heat flux - Ability to fabricate highly reflective targets 3) It’s time for some data!

Side view, cross-section of LANL cryogenic torus (windows not shown) 5) Survive the thermal environment – experiment on response of DT to a rapid heat flux DT/Foam Layer Based on prior experiments done for ICF Equipment available at LANL Cryogenic torus effectively turns the target “inside-out” – exposing the DT ice inner surface for viewing Experiment planning meeting at NRL on February 7, 2001 (LANL, GA, Schafer, NRL) Experimental equipment being evaluated/designed at LANL Foam cast in torus Exposed DT Side view, cross-section of LANL cryogenic torus (windows not shown)

5) Survive the thermal environment – data on gold overcoating reflectivity Deposited gold layers on 1 m of GDP (flats for now, spheres next) Measured optical properties with ellipsometry Calculated reflectivity as function of wavelength and angle of incidence Calculated overall reflectivity for a given blackbody spectrum Calculated the corresponding heat flux and compared to the 2-level criteria for survival 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 900 Å 500 Å 300 Å Reflectivity Gold thickness = 100 Å From T. K. Mau, UCSD 700 900 1100 1300 1500 Wall Temperature (C)

5) Survive the thermal environment – transmission may be a viable option Evaluated IR absorption bands for DT vs. blackbody radiation spectrum Calculated bulk heating of DT assuming normal incidence Results show low DT absorption

6) Accuracy and repeatability, tracking - experimental target injection and tracking system Strategy and approach Acquire proof-of-principle data on target injection as soon as possible (RT first, then cryo) Provide a facility to aid in developing practical, survivable targets Develop and demonstrate injection and tracking technologies suitable for an IFE power plant Prototype concepts and designs for application in an IRE Conceptual design was completed in CY00; final design in 2001 Direct drive target sabot A gas-gun is selected as a demonstrated technology to acquire injection/tracking data

Summary and conclusions Target Fabrication Demonstrating a credible pathway for mass-production of IFE targets: Five-year plan Proof-of-principle fabrication steps being taken Issues, e.g., gold permeability, being examined and backups developed Industrial mass-production technologies being evaluated Chemical process modeling and fab facility cost estimates started High-volume filling methods being studied in detail Target Injection Analyses of target survival during injection have shown “success windows” Next step is acquisition of data on DT response and reflection Design of an injection and tracking system is proceeding as planned Conceptual design review completed with minor comments …. Significant progress is being made towards demonstrating practical and self-consistent scenarios for target fabrication and injection